Evaluating the Ebb and Flow: An In-depth Analysis of Question-Answering Trends across Diverse Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05961v5
• Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:07:46 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Ebb and Flow: An In-depth Analysis of Question-Answering Trends across Diverse Platforms
• Authors: Rima Hazra, Agnik Saha, Somnath Banerjee, Animesh Mukherjee,
• Abstract summary: Community Question Answering (CQA) platforms steadily gain popularity as they provide users with fast responses to their queries. This paper scrutinizes these contributing factors within the context of six highly popular CQA platforms, identified through their standout answering speed.
• Score: 4.686969290158106
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Community Question Answering (CQA) platforms steadily gain popularity as they provide users with fast responses to their queries. The swiftness of these responses is contingent on a mixture of query-specific and user-related elements. This paper scrutinizes these contributing factors within the context of six highly popular CQA platforms, identified through their standout answering speed. Our investigation reveals a correlation between the time taken to yield the first response to a question and several variables: the metadata, the formulation of the questions, and the level of interaction among users. Additionally, by employing conventional machine learning models to analyze these metadata and patterns of user interaction, we endeavor to predict which queries will receive their initial responses promptly.

Related papers

• S-EQA: Tackling Situational Queries in Embodied Question Answering [48.43453390717167]
  We present and tackle the problem of Embodied Question Answering with Situational Queries (S-EQA) in a household environment. We first introduce a novel Prompt-Generate-Evaluate scheme that wraps around an LLM's output to create a dataset of unique situational queries and corresponding consensus object information. We report an improved accuracy of 15.31% while using queries framed from the generated object consensus for Visual Question Answering (VQA) over directly answering situational ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:45:20Z)
• CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrieval [52.134133938779776]
  We present CLARINET, a system that asks informative clarification questions by choosing questions whose answers would maximize certainty in the correct candidate. Our approach works by augmenting a large language model (LLM) to condition on a retrieval distribution, finetuning end-to-end to generate the question that would have maximized the rank of the true candidate at each turn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T18:21:31Z)
• Selecting Query-bag as Pseudo Relevance Feedback for Information-seeking Conversations [76.70349332096693]
  Information-seeking dialogue systems are widely used in e-commerce systems. We propose a Query-bag based Pseudo Relevance Feedback framework (QB-PRF) It constructs a query-bag with related queries to serve as pseudo signals to guide information-seeking conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:10:32Z)
• MQAG: Multiple-choice Question Answering and Generation for Assessing Information Consistency in Summarization [55.60306377044225]
  State-of-the-art summarization systems can generate highly fluent summaries. These summaries, however, may contain factual inconsistencies and/or information not present in the source. We introduce an alternative scheme based on standard information-theoretic measures in which the information present in the source and summary is directly compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T23:08:25Z)
• Best-Answer Prediction in Q&A Sites Using User Information [2.982218441172364]
  Community Question Answering (CQA) sites have spread and multiplied significantly in recent years. One practical way of finding such answers is automatically predicting the best candidate given existing answers and comments. We address this limitation using a novel method for predicting the best answers using the questioner's background information and other features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T02:28:52Z)
• RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now? [137.04039209995932]
  We introduce REALTIME QA, a dynamic question answering (QA) platform that announces questions and evaluates systems on a regular basis. We build strong baseline models upon large pretrained language models, including GPT-3 and T5. GPT-3 tends to return outdated answers when retrieved documents do not provide sufficient information to find an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T07:26:01Z)
• A Benchmark for Generalizable and Interpretable Temporal Question Answering over Knowledge Bases [67.33560134350427]
  TempQA-WD is a benchmark dataset for temporal reasoning. It is based on Wikidata, which is the most frequently curated, openly available knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T08:49:09Z)
• Effective FAQ Retrieval and Question Matching With Unsupervised Knowledge Injection [10.82418428209551]
  We propose a contextual language model for retrieving appropriate answers to frequently asked questions. We also explore to capitalize on domain-specific topically-relevant relations between words in an unsupervised manner. We evaluate variants of our approach on a publicly-available Chinese FAQ dataset, and further apply and contextualize it to a large-scale question-matching task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T05:03:34Z)
• A Wrong Answer or a Wrong Question? An Intricate Relationship between Question Reformulation and Answer Selection in Conversational Question Answering [15.355557454305776]
  We show that question rewriting (QR) of the conversational context allows to shed more light on this phenomenon. We present the results of this analysis on the TREC CAsT and QuAC (CANARD) datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T06:29:51Z)
• An Empirical Study of Clarifying Question-Based Systems [15.767515065224016]
  We conduct an online experiment by deploying an experimental system, which interacts with users by asking clarifying questions against a product repository. We collect both implicit interaction behavior data and explicit feedback from users showing that: (a) users are willing to answer a good number of clarifying questions (11-21 on average), but not many more than that.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-01T15:10:11Z)
• Review-guided Helpful Answer Identification in E-commerce [38.276241153439955]
  Product-specific community question answering platforms can greatly help address the concerns of potential customers. The user-provided answers on such platforms often vary a lot in their qualities. Helpfulness votes from the community can indicate the overall quality of the answer, but they are often missing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T11:34:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.