Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06135v2
• Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 05:30:26 GMT
• Title: Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts
• Authors: Zhi-Yi Chin, Chieh-Ming Jiang, Ching-Chun Huang, Pin-Yu Chen, Wei-Chen Chiu,
• Abstract summary: Text-to-image diffusion models have shown remarkable ability in high-quality content generation. This work proposes Prompting4 Debugging (P4D) as a tool that automatically finds problematic prompts for diffusion models. Our result shows that around half of prompts in existing safe prompting benchmarks which were originally considered "safe" can actually be manipulated to bypass many deployed safety mechanisms.
• Score: 63.61248884015162
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models, e.g. Stable Diffusion (SD), lately have shown remarkable ability in high-quality content generation, and become one of the representatives for the recent wave of transformative AI. Nevertheless, such advance comes with an intensifying concern about the misuse of this generative technology, especially for producing copyrighted or NSFW (i.e. not safe for work) images. Although efforts have been made to filter inappropriate images/prompts or remove undesirable concepts/styles via model fine-tuning, the reliability of these safety mechanisms against diversified problematic prompts remains largely unexplored. In this work, we propose Prompting4Debugging (P4D) as a debugging and red-teaming tool that automatically finds problematic prompts for diffusion models to test the reliability of a deployed safety mechanism. We demonstrate the efficacy of our P4D tool in uncovering new vulnerabilities of SD models with safety mechanisms. Particularly, our result shows that around half of prompts in existing safe prompting benchmarks which were originally considered "safe" can actually be manipulated to bypass many deployed safety mechanisms, including concept removal, negative prompt, and safety guidance. Our findings suggest that, without comprehensive testing, the evaluations on limited safe prompting benchmarks can lead to a false sense of safety for text-to-image models.

Related papers

• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [97.82118821263825]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community. We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts. Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• Safety Without Semantic Disruptions: Editing-free Safe Image Generation via Context-preserving Dual Latent Reconstruction [49.60774626839712]
  Training multimodal generative models can expose users to harmful, unsafe and controversial or culturally-inappropriate outputs. We propose a modular, dynamic solution that leverages safety-context embeddings and a dual reconstruction process to generate safer images. We achieve state-of-the-art results on safe image generation benchmarks, while offering controllable variation of model safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:47:13Z)
• AdvI2I: Adversarial Image Attack on Image-to-Image Diffusion models [20.37481116837779]
  AdvI2I is a novel framework that manipulates input images to induce diffusion models to generate NSFW content. By optimizing a generator to craft adversarial images, AdvI2I circumvents existing defense mechanisms. We show that both AdvI2I and AdvI2I-Adaptive can effectively bypass current safeguards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T19:15:06Z)
• SteerDiff: Steering towards Safe Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [5.781285400461636]
  Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models can be misused to produce inappropriate content. We introduce SteerDiff, a lightweight adaptor module designed to act as an intermediary between user input and the diffusion model. We conduct extensive experiments across various concept unlearning tasks to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T17:34:55Z)
• EIUP: A Training-Free Approach to Erase Non-Compliant Concepts Conditioned on Implicit Unsafe Prompts [32.590822043053734]
  Non-toxic text still carries a risk of generating non-compliant images, which is referred to as implicit unsafe prompts. We propose a simple yet effective approach that incorporates non-compliant concepts into an erasure prompt. Our method exhibits superior erasure effectiveness while achieving high scores in image fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T05:17:14Z)
• Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models? [52.238883592674696]
  Ring-A-Bell is a model-agnostic red-teaming tool for T2I diffusion models. It identifies problematic prompts for diffusion models with the corresponding generation of inappropriate content. Our results show that Ring-A-Bell, by manipulating safe prompting benchmarks, can transform prompts that were originally regarded as safe to evade existing safety mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T02:11:20Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• SurrogatePrompt: Bypassing the Safety Filter of Text-to-Image Models via Substitution [21.93748586123046]
  We develop and exhibit the first prompt attacks on Midjourney, resulting in the production of abundant NSFW images. Our framework, SurrogatePrompt, systematically generates attack prompts, utilizing large language models, image-to-text, and image-to-image modules. Results disclose an 88% success rate in bypassing Midjourney's proprietary safety filter with our attack prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T13:20:15Z)
• FLIRT: Feedback Loop In-context Red Teaming [79.63896510559357]
  We propose an automatic red teaming framework that evaluates a given black-box model and exposes its vulnerabilities. Our framework uses in-context learning in a feedback loop to red team models and trigger them into unsafe content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T14:03:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.