AutoAM: An End-To-End Neural Model for Automatic and Universal Argument Mining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09300v1
• Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:26:21 GMT
• Title: AutoAM: An End-To-End Neural Model for Automatic and Universal Argument Mining
• Authors: Lang Cao
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel neural model called AutoAM to solve these problems. Our model is a universal end-to-end framework, which can analyze argument structure without constraints like tree structure.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Argument mining is to analyze argument structure and extract important argument information from unstructured text. An argument mining system can help people automatically gain causal and logical information behind the text. As argumentative corpus gradually increases, like more people begin to argue and debate on social media, argument mining from them is becoming increasingly critical. However, argument mining is still a big challenge in natural language tasks due to its difficulty, and relative techniques are not mature. For example, research on non-tree argument mining needs to be done more. Most works just focus on extracting tree structure argument information. Moreover, current methods cannot accurately describe and capture argument relations and do not predict their types. In this paper, we propose a novel neural model called AutoAM to solve these problems. We first introduce the argument component attention mechanism in our model. It can capture the relevant information between argument components, so our model can better perform argument mining. Our model is a universal end-to-end framework, which can analyze argument structure without constraints like tree structure and complete three subtasks of argument mining in one model. The experiment results show that our model outperforms the existing works on several metrics in two public datasets.

Related papers

• ArgU: A Controllable Factual Argument Generator [0.0]
  ArgU is a neural argument generator capable of producing factual arguments from input facts and real-world concepts. We have compiled and released an annotated corpora of 69,428 arguments spanning six topics and six argument schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T10:49:45Z)
• MetaLogic: Logical Reasoning Explanations with Fine-Grained Structure [129.8481568648651]
  We propose a benchmark to investigate models' logical reasoning capabilities in complex real-life scenarios. Based on the multi-hop chain of reasoning, the explanation form includes three main components. We evaluate the current best models' performance on this new explanation form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T16:01:13Z)
• Diversity Over Size: On the Effect of Sample and Topic Sizes for Argument Mining Datasets [65.91772010586605]
  Large Argument Mining datasets are rare and recognition of argumentative sentences requires expert knowledge. Given the cost and complexity of creating large Argument Mining datasets, we ask whether it is necessary for acceptable performance to have datasets growing in size. Our findings show that, when using carefully composed training samples and a model pretrained on related tasks, we can reach 95% of the maximum performance while reducing the training sample size by at least 85%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:14:32Z)
• Explainable AI through the Learning of Arguments [0.0]
  Symbolic machine learning techniques learn a set of arguments as an intermediate representation. We investigate the learning of arguments from a 'case model' proposed by Verheij. We compare the learning of arguments from a case model with the HeRO algorithm and learning a decision tree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T12:52:30Z)
• Reinforcement Learning-based Dialogue Guided Event Extraction to Exploit Argument Relations [70.35379323231241]
  This paper presents a better approach for event extraction by explicitly utilizing the relationships of event arguments. We employ reinforcement learning and incremental learning to extract multiple arguments via a multi-turned, iterative process. Experimental results show that our approach consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art event extraction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T13:24:39Z)
• Aspect-Based Argument Mining [2.3148470932285665]
  We present the task of Aspect-Based Argument Mining (ABAM) with the essential subtasks of Aspect Term Extraction (ATE) and Nested Term Extraction (NS) We consider aspects as the main point(s) argument units are addressing. This information is important for further downstream tasks such as argument ranking, argument summarization and generation, as well as the search for counter-arguments on the aspect-level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T21:57:51Z)
• Aspect-Controlled Neural Argument Generation [65.91772010586605]
  We train a language model for argument generation that can be controlled on a fine-grained level to generate sentence-level arguments for a given topic, stance, and aspect. Our evaluation shows that our generation model is able to generate high-quality, aspect-specific arguments. These arguments can be used to improve the performance of stance detection models via data augmentation and to generate counter-arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T20:17:22Z)
• AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions [41.06165177604387]
  We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums. Our approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T10:33:40Z)
• Multi-Step Inference for Reasoning Over Paragraphs [95.91527524872832]
  Complex reasoning over text requires understanding and chaining together free-form predicates and logical connectives. We present a compositional model reminiscent of neural module networks that can perform chained logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T21:12:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.