Learning to Recover for Safe Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11907v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:17:38 GMT
• Title: Learning to Recover for Safe Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We propose a three-stage architecture for safe reinforcement learning, namely TU-Recovery Architecture. A safety critic and a recovery policy is learned before task training. They form a safety controller to ensure safety in task training.
• Score: 11.891438526371495
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Safety controllers is widely used to achieve safe reinforcement learning. Most methods that apply a safety controller are using handcrafted safety constraints to construct the safety controller. However, when the environment dynamics are sophisticated, handcrafted safety constraints become unavailable. Therefore, it worth to research on constructing safety controllers by learning algorithms. We propose a three-stage architecture for safe reinforcement learning, namely TU-Recovery Architecture. A safety critic and a recovery policy is learned before task training. They form a safety controller to ensure safety in task training. Then a phenomenon induced by disagreement between task policy and recovery policy, called adversarial phenomenon, which reduces learning efficiency and model performance, is described. Auxiliary reward is proposed to mitigate adversarial phenomenon, while help the task policy to learn to recover from high-risk states. A series of experiments are conducted in a robot navigation environment. Experiments demonstrate that TU-Recovery outperforms unconstrained counterpart in both reward gaining and constraint violations during task training, and auxiliary reward further improve TU-Recovery in reward-to-cost ratio by significantly reduce constraint violations.

Related papers

• Bresa: Bio-inspired Reflexive Safe Reinforcement Learning for Contact-Rich Robotic Tasks [14.311037569372369]
  We propose Bresa, a Bio-inspired Reflexive Hierarchical Safe RL method inspired by biological reflexes. Our method decouples task learning from safety learning, incorporating a safety critic network that evaluates action risks and operates at a higher frequency than the task solver. Our results show that Bresa outperforms the baseline, providing a robust and reflexive safety mechanism that bridges the gap between high-level planning and low-level execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T21:11:32Z)
• Safety through Permissibility: Shield Construction for Fast and Safe Reinforcement Learning [57.84059344739159]
  "Shielding" is a popular technique to enforce safety inReinforcement Learning (RL) We propose a new permissibility-based framework to deal with safety and shield construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T18:00:21Z)
• Searching for Optimal Runtime Assurance via Reachability and Reinforcement Learning [2.422636931175853]
  runtime assurance system (RTA) for a given plant enables the exercise of an untrusted or experimental controller while assuring safety with a backup controller. Existing RTA design strategies are well-known to be overly conservative and, in principle, can lead to safety violations. In this paper, we formulate the optimal RTA design problem and present a new approach for solving it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T14:45:57Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning with Dead-Ends Avoidance and Recovery [13.333197887318168]
  Safety is one of the main challenges in applying reinforcement learning to realistic environmental tasks. We propose a method to construct a boundary that discriminates safe and unsafe states. Our approach has better task performance with less safety violations than state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-24T12:02:50Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Barrier Certified Safety Learning Control: When Sum-of-Square Programming Meets Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  This work adopts control barrier functions over reinforcement learning, and proposes a compensated algorithm to completely maintain safety. Compared to quadratic programming based reinforcement learning methods, our sum-of-squares programming based reinforcement learning has shown its superiority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T04:38:50Z)
• SAFER: Data-Efficient and Safe Reinforcement Learning via Skill Acquisition [59.94644674087599]
  We propose SAFEty skill pRiors (SAFER), an algorithm that accelerates policy learning on complex control tasks under safety constraints. Through principled training on an offline dataset, SAFER learns to extract safe primitive skills. In the inference stage, policies trained with SAFER learn to compose safe skills into successful policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T05:43:41Z)
• Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Control Barrier Functions [43.713259595810854]
  An increasingly common approach to address safety involves the addition of a safety layer that projects the RL actions onto a safe set of actions. In this paper, we frame safety as a differentiable robust-control-barrier-function layer in a model-based RL framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T17:00:45Z)
• Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Critic [72.00568333130391]
  A natural first approach toward safe RL is to manually specify constraints on the policy's behavior. We propose to learn how to be safe in one set of tasks and environments, and then use that learned intuition to constrain future behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T20:53:20Z)
• Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration [120.73241848565449]
  We study the problem of safe exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) We learn a conservative safety estimate of environment states through a critic. We show that the proposed approach can achieve competitive task performance while incurring significantly lower catastrophic failure rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T17:54:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.