OpenAi's GPT4 as coding assistant

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12732v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:31:39 GMT
• Title: OpenAi's GPT4 as coding assistant
• Authors: Lefteris Moussiades and George Zografos
• Abstract summary: GPT4 is considered the most potent Large Language Model from Openai. In this paper, we examine GPT3.5 and GPT4 as coding assistants.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Lately, Large Language Models have been widely used in code generation. GPT4 is considered the most potent Large Language Model from Openai. In this paper, we examine GPT3.5 and GPT4 as coding assistants. More specifically, we have constructed appropriate tests to check whether the two systems can a) answer typical questions that can arise during the code development, b) produce reliable code, and c) contribute to code debugging. The test results are impressive. The performance of GPT4 is outstanding and signals an increase in the productivity of programmers and the reorganization of software development procedures based on these new tools.

Related papers

• CodeGRAG: Bridging the Gap between Natural Language and Programming Language via Graphical Retrieval Augmented Generation [58.84212778960507]
  We propose CodeGRAG, a Graphical Retrieval Augmented Code Generation framework to enhance the performance of LLMs. CodeGRAG builds the graphical view of code blocks based on the control flow and data flow of them to fill the gap between programming languages and natural language. Various experiments and ablations are done on four datasets including both the C++ and python languages to validate the hard meta-graph prompt, the soft prompting technique, and the effectiveness of the objectives for pretrained GNN expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T02:48:55Z)
• Design2Code: How Far Are We From Automating Front-End Engineering? [83.06100360864502]
  We formalize this as a Design2Code task and conduct comprehensive benchmarking. Specifically, we manually curate a benchmark of 484 diverse real-world webpages as test cases. We develop a suite of multimodal prompting methods and show their effectiveness on GPT-4V and Gemini Pro Vision. Both human evaluation and automatic metrics show that GPT-4V performs the best on this task compared to other models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T17:56:27Z)
• Comparing large language models and human programmers for generating programming code [0.0]
  GPT-4 substantially outperforms other large language models, including Gemini Ultra and Claude 2. In most LeetCode and GeeksforGeeks coding contests evaluated in this study, GPT-4 employing the optimal prompt strategy outperforms 85 percent of human participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T14:43:06Z)
• OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinement [58.034012276819425]
  We introduce OpenCodeInterpreter, a family of open-source code systems for generating, executing, and iteratively refining code. Our comprehensive evaluation of OpenCodeInterpreter across key benchmarks such as HumanEval, MBPP, and their enhanced versions from EvalPlus reveals its exceptional performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T16:06:23Z)
• Leveraging Print Debugging to Improve Code Generation in Large Language Models [63.63160583432348]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation tasks. But their performance in tackling programming problems with complex data structures and algorithms remains suboptimal. We propose an in-context learning approach that guides LLMs to debug by using a "print debug" method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T18:37:59Z)
• LLM4TDD: Best Practices for Test Driven Development Using Large Language Models [0.76146285961466]
  This paper explores the concept of LLM4TDD, where we guide Large Language Models to generate code iteratively using a test-driven development methodology. We conduct an empirical evaluation using ChatGPT and coding problems from LeetCode to investigate the impact of different test, prompt and problem attributes on the efficacy of LLM4TDD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T20:37:54Z)
• Thrilled by Your Progress! Large Language Models (GPT-4) No Longer Struggle to Pass Assessments in Higher Education Programming Courses [0.0]
  GPT models evolved from completely failing the typical programming class' assessments to confidently passing the courses with no human involvement. This study provides evidence that programming instructors need to prepare for a world in which there is an easy-to-use technology that can be utilized by learners to collect passing scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T22:12:34Z)
• Analysis of ChatGPT on Source Code [1.3381749415517021]
  This paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) and in particular ChatGPT in programming, source code analysis, and code generation. LLMs and ChatGPT are built using machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques, and they offer several benefits to developers and programmers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T12:12:59Z)
• AI-assisted coding: Experiments with GPT-4 [0.22366638308792727]
  GPT-4 can generate tests with substantial coverage, but that many of the tests fail applied to the associated code. These findings suggest that while AI coding tools are very powerful, they still require humans in the loop to ensure validity and accuracy of the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T22:59:01Z)
• Visual Instruction Tuning [79.70923292053097]
  We present the first attempt to use language-only GPT-4 to generate multimodal language-image instruction-following data. By instruction tuning on such generated data, we introduce LLaVA: Large Language and Vision Assistant. When fine-tuned on Science QA, the synergy of LLaVA and GPT-4 achieves a new state-of-the-art accuracy of 92.53%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T17:59:25Z)
• Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS [54.22600767666257]
  We introduce APPS, a benchmark for code generation. Our benchmark includes 10,000 problems, which range from having simple one-line solutions to being substantial algorithmic challenges. Recent models such as GPT-Neo can pass approximately 15% of the test cases of introductory problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T17:58:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.