Identifiability Matters: Revealing the Hidden Recoverable Condition in Unbiased Learning to Rank
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15560v3
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:29:55 GMT
- Title: Identifiability Matters: Revealing the Hidden Recoverable Condition in Unbiased Learning to Rank
- Authors: Mouxiang Chen, Chenghao Liu, Zemin Liu, Zhuo Li, Jianling Sun,
- Abstract summary: We investigate the conditions under which relevance can be recovered from click data.
The recovery of relevance is feasible if and only if the identifiability graph (IG) is connected.
We introduce two methods, namely node intervention and node merging, designed to modify the dataset and restore the connectivity of the IG.
- Score: 37.15089945367366
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Unbiased Learning to Rank (ULTR) aims to train unbiased ranking models from biased click logs, by explicitly modeling a generation process for user behavior and fitting click data based on examination hypothesis. Previous research found empirically that the true latent relevance is mostly recoverable through click fitting. However, we demonstrate that this is not always achievable, resulting in a significant reduction in ranking performance. This research investigates the conditions under which relevance can be recovered from click data in the first principle. We initially characterize a ranking model as identifiable if it can recover the true relevance up to a scaling transformation, a criterion sufficient for the pairwise ranking objective. Subsequently, we investigate an equivalent condition for identifiability, articulated as a graph connectivity test problem: the recovery of relevance is feasible if and only if the identifiability graph (IG), derived from the underlying structure of the dataset, is connected. The presence of a disconnected IG may lead to degenerate cases and suboptimal ranking performance. To tackle this challenge, we introduce two methods, namely node intervention and node merging, designed to modify the dataset and restore the connectivity of the IG. Empirical results derived from a simulated dataset and two real-world LTR benchmark datasets not only validate our proposed theory but also demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in alleviating data bias when the relevance model is unidentifiable.
Related papers
- TCGU: Data-centric Graph Unlearning based on Transferable Condensation [36.670771080732486]
Transferable Condensation Graph Unlearning (TCGU) is a data-centric solution to zero-glance graph unlearning.
We show that TCGU can achieve superior performance in terms of model utility, unlearning efficiency, and unlearning efficacy than existing GU methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T02:14:40Z) - Hybrid Reinforcement Learning from Offline Observation Alone [19.14864618744221]
We consider the hybrid reinforcement learning setting where the agent has access to both offline data and online interactive access.
We propose the first algorithm in the trace model setting that provably matches the performance of algorithms that leverage a reset model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T13:34:05Z) - Demystifying amortized causal discovery with transformers [21.058343547918053]
Supervised learning approaches for causal discovery from observational data often achieve competitive performance.
In this work, we investigate CSIvA, a transformer-based model promising to train on synthetic data and transfer to real data.
We bridge the gap with existing identifiability theory and show that constraints on the training data distribution implicitly define a prior on the test observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T08:17:49Z) - DAGnosis: Localized Identification of Data Inconsistencies using
Structures [73.39285449012255]
Identification and appropriate handling of inconsistencies in data at deployment time is crucial to reliably use machine learning models.
We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to encode the training set's features probability distribution and independencies as a structure.
Our method, called DAGnosis, leverages these structural interactions to bring valuable and insightful data-centric conclusions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T11:29:16Z) - Score-based Causal Representation Learning: Linear and General Transformations [31.786444957887472]
The paper addresses both the identifiability and achievability aspects.
It designs a score-based class of algorithms that ensures both identifiability and achievability.
Results are empirically validated via experiments on structured synthetic data and image data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T18:40:03Z) - Fake It Till Make It: Federated Learning with Consensus-Oriented
Generation [52.82176415223988]
We propose federated learning with consensus-oriented generation (FedCOG)
FedCOG consists of two key components at the client side: complementary data generation and knowledge-distillation-based model training.
Experiments on classical and real-world FL datasets show that FedCOG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-10T18:49:59Z) - General Identifiability and Achievability for Causal Representation
Learning [33.80247458590611]
The paper establishes identifiability and achievability results using two hard uncoupled interventions per node in the latent causal graph.
For identifiability, the paper establishes that perfect recovery of the latent causal model and variables is guaranteed under uncoupled interventions.
The analysis, additionally, recovers the identifiability result for two hard coupled interventions, that is when metadata about the pair of environments that have the same node intervened is known.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T01:47:44Z) - Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data.
We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z) - Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe.
GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z) - Federated Causal Discovery [74.37739054932733]
This paper develops a gradient-based learning framework named DAG-Shared Federated Causal Discovery (DS-FCD)
It can learn the causal graph without directly touching local data and naturally handle the data heterogeneity.
Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets verify the efficacy of the proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T08:04:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.