Multimodal Analysis Of Google Bard And GPT-Vision: Experiments In Visual Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16705v2
• Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 19:53:39 GMT
• Title: Multimodal Analysis Of Google Bard And GPT-Vision: Experiments In Visual Reasoning
• Authors: David Noever and Samantha Elizabeth Miller Noever
• Abstract summary: We subject Google Bard and GPT-Vision to 64 visual tasks spanning categories like "Visual Situational Reasoning" and "Next Scene Prediction" Our findings spotlight both vision-language model's limitations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Addressing the gap in understanding visual comprehension in Large Language Models (LLMs), we designed a challenge-response study, subjecting Google Bard and GPT-Vision to 64 visual tasks, spanning categories like "Visual Situational Reasoning" and "Next Scene Prediction." Previous models, such as GPT4, leaned heavily on optical character recognition tools like Tesseract, whereas Bard and GPT-Vision, akin to Google Lens and Visual API, employ deep learning techniques for visual text recognition. However, our findings spotlight both vision-language model's limitations: while proficient in solving visual CAPTCHAs that stump ChatGPT alone, it falters in recreating visual elements like ASCII art or analyzing Tic Tac Toe grids, suggesting an over-reliance on educated visual guesses. The prediction problem based on visual inputs appears particularly challenging with no common-sense guesses for next-scene forecasting based on current "next-token" multimodal models. This study provides experimental insights into the current capacities and areas for improvement in multimodal LLMs.

Related papers

• Instruction Tuning-free Visual Token Complement for Multimodal LLMs [51.138806401996696]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have promised an elegant bridge between vision and language. We propose a Visual Token Complement framework (VTC) that helps MLLMs regain the missing visual features. Our VTC integrates text-to-image generation as a guide to identifying the text-irrelevant features, and a visual selector is then developed to generate complementary visual tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T12:13:01Z)
• LLaVA-Read: Enhancing Reading Ability of Multimodal Language Models [60.67899965748755]
  We present LLaVA-Read, a multimodal large language model that utilizes dual visual encoders along with a visual text encoder. Our research suggests visual text understanding remains an open challenge and an efficient visual text encoder is crucial for future successful multimodal systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T05:53:37Z)
• Improving Visual Commonsense in Language Models via Multiple Image Generation [41.565399860320966]
  Existing large language models (LLMs) are primarily trained using textual data only. Visual Language Models, which excel at visually-oriented tasks, often fail at non-visual tasks such as basic commonsense reasoning. This divergence highlights a critical challenge - the integration of robust visual understanding with foundational text-based language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T15:17:10Z)
• Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs [50.77984109941538]
  Our research reveals that the visual capabilities in recent multimodal LLMs still exhibit systematic shortcomings. We identify ''CLIP-blind pairs'' - images that CLIP perceives as similar despite their clear visual differences. We evaluate various CLIP-based vision-and-language models and found a notable correlation between visual patterns that challenge CLIP models and those problematic for multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T18:58:36Z)
• Unified Language-Vision Pretraining in LLM with Dynamic Discrete Visual Tokenization [52.935150075484074]
  We introduce a well-designed visual tokenizer to translate the non-linguistic image into a sequence of discrete tokens like a foreign language. The resulting visual tokens encompass high-level semantics worthy of a word and also support dynamic sequence length varying from the image. This unification empowers LaVIT to serve as an impressive generalist interface to understand and generate multi-modal content simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T03:01:38Z)
• See, Think, Confirm: Interactive Prompting Between Vision and Language Models for Knowledge-based Visual Reasoning [60.43585179885355]
  We propose a novel framework named Interactive Prompting Visual Reasoner (IPVR) for few-shot knowledge-based visual reasoning. IPVR contains three stages, see, think and confirm. We conduct experiments on a range of knowledge-based visual reasoning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T18:59:50Z)
• Localization vs. Semantics: Visual Representations in Unimodal and Multimodal Models [57.08925810659545]
  We conduct a comparative analysis of the visual representations in existing vision-and-language models and vision-only models. Our empirical observations suggest that vision-and-language models are better at label prediction tasks. We hope our study sheds light on the role of language in visual learning, and serves as an empirical guide for various pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T05:00:18Z)
• VLMAE: Vision-Language Masked Autoencoder [21.97700040013084]
  We propose a vision-language masked autoencoder framework (VLMAE) for vision-language pre-training. VLMAE employs visual generative learning, facilitating the model to acquire fine-grained and unbiased features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T14:39:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.