No Offense Taken: Eliciting Offensiveness from Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00892v1
• Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 04:17:35 GMT
• Title: No Offense Taken: Eliciting Offensiveness from Language Models
• Authors: Anugya Srivastava and Rahul Ahuja and Rohith Mukku
• Abstract summary: We focus on Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models by Perez et al.(2022) Our contributions include developing a pipeline for automated test case generation via red teaming. We generate a corpus of test cases that can help in eliciting offensive responses from widely deployed LMs.
• Score: 0.3683202928838613
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This work was completed in May 2022. For safe and reliable deployment of language models in the real world, testing needs to be robust. This robustness can be characterized by the difficulty and diversity of the test cases we evaluate these models on. Limitations in human-in-the-loop test case generation has prompted an advent of automated test case generation approaches. In particular, we focus on Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models by Perez et al.(2022). Our contributions include developing a pipeline for automated test case generation via red teaming that leverages publicly available smaller language models (LMs), experimenting with different target LMs and red classifiers, and generating a corpus of test cases that can help in eliciting offensive responses from widely deployed LMs and identifying their failure modes.

Related papers

• Automatic Generation of Behavioral Test Cases For Natural Language Processing Using Clustering and Prompting [6.938766764201549]
  This paper introduces an automated approach to develop test cases by exploiting the power of large language models and statistical techniques. We analyze the behavioral test profiles across four different classification algorithms and discuss the limitations and strengths of those models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T21:12:21Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)
• Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Models [43.448044721642916]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold great potential for many natural language applications but risk generating incorrect or toxic content. relying solely on human testers is expensive and time-consuming. Our method of curiosity-driven red teaming (CRT) achieves greater coverage of test cases while mantaining or increasing their effectiveness compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:55:03Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Training and Inference of Bayesian Controllable Language Models [58.990214815032495]
  Large-scale pre-trained language models have achieved great success on natural language generation tasks. BCLMs have been shown to be efficient in controllable language generation. We propose a "Gemini Discriminator" for controllable language generation which alleviates the mismatch problem with a small computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-11T12:52:32Z)
• Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models [8.237872606555383]
  Language Models (LMs) often cannot be deployed because of their potential to harm users in hard-to-predict ways. Prior work identifies harmful behaviors before deployment by using human annotators to hand-write test cases. In this work, we automatically find cases where a target LM behaves in a harmful way, by generating test cases ("red teaming") using another LM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T15:22:17Z)
• Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Models [86.02610674750345]
  Adversarial GLUE (AdvGLUE) is a new multi-task benchmark to explore and evaluate the vulnerabilities of modern large-scale language models under various types of adversarial attacks. We apply 14 adversarial attack methods to GLUE tasks to construct AdvGLUE, which is further validated by humans for reliable annotations. All the language models and robust training methods we tested perform poorly on AdvGLUE, with scores lagging far behind the benign accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T12:59:55Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.