The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the
Current State of Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00907v1
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 05:30:42 GMT
- Title: The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the
Current State of Practice
- Authors: Fernando Delgado, Stephen Yang, Michael Madaio, Qian Yang
- Abstract summary: This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation.
We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
- Score: 64.29355073494125
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite the growing consensus that stakeholders affected by AI systems should
participate in their design, enormous variation and implicit disagreements
exist among current approaches. For researchers and practitioners who are
interested in taking a participatory approach to AI design and development, it
remains challenging to assess the extent to which any participatory approach
grants substantive agency to stakeholders. This article thus aims to ground
what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing
theoretical literature on participation and through empirical investigation and
critique of its current practices. Specifically, we derive a conceptual
framework through synthesis of literature across technology design, political
theory, and the social sciences that researchers and practitioners can leverage
to evaluate approaches to participation in AI design. Additionally, we
articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory
practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and
semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners. We use
these empirical findings to understand the current state of participatory
practice and subsequently provide guidance to better align participatory goals
and methods in a way that accounts for practical constraints.
Related papers
- Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - The illusion of artificial inclusion [5.721091784293226]
Human participants play a central role in the development of modern artificial intelligence technology.
Recent advances in generative AI have attracted growing interest to the possibility of replacing human participants with AI surrogates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T18:58:02Z) - Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review
of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community.
We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022.
We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z) - Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial
AI labs [0.17205106391379024]
There is a dearth of evidence on attitudes to and approaches for participation in the sites driving major AI developments.
This paper explores how commercial AI labs understand participatory AI approaches and the obstacles they have faced implementing these practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T14:34:28Z) - An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago.
We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - Ethical Assurance: A practical approach to the responsible design,
development, and deployment of data-driven technologies [0.0]
Article offers contributions to the interdisciplinary project of responsible research and innovation in data science and AI.
First, it provides a critical analysis of current efforts to establish practical mechanisms for algorithmic assessment.
Second, it provides an accessible introduction to the methodology of argument-based assurance.
Third, it establishes a novel version of argument-based assurance that we call 'ethical assurance'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T11:21:49Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Progressing Towards Responsible AI [2.191505742658975]
Observatory on Society and Artificial Intelligence (OSAI) grew out of the project AI4EU.
OSAI aims to stimulate reflection on a broad spectrum of issues of AI (ethical, legal, social, economic and cultural)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T09:46:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.