Reinforcement Learning in the Era of LLMs: What is Essential? What is
needed? An RL Perspective on RLHF, Prompting, and Beyond
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06147v1
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:49:42 GMT
- Title: Reinforcement Learning in the Era of LLMs: What is Essential? What is
needed? An RL Perspective on RLHF, Prompting, and Beyond
- Authors: Hao Sun
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback used in Large Language Models.
Demystify this technique by discussing why, when, and how RL excels.
- Score: 8.044033685073003
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered wide
attention and led to successful products such as ChatGPT and GPT-4. Their
proficiency in adhering to instructions and delivering harmless, helpful, and
honest (3H) responses can largely be attributed to the technique of
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). In this paper, we aim to
link the research in conventional RL to RL techniques used in LLM research.
Demystify this technique by discussing why, when, and how RL excels.
Furthermore, we explore potential future avenues that could either benefit from
or contribute to RLHF research.
Highlighted Takeaways:
1. RLHF is Online Inverse RL with Offline Demonstration Data.
2. RLHF $>$ SFT because Imitation Learning (and Inverse RL) $>$ Behavior
Cloning (BC) by alleviating the problem of compounding error.
3. The RM step in RLHF generates a proxy of the expensive human feedback,
such an insight can be generalized to other LLM tasks such as prompting
evaluation and optimization where feedback is also expensive.
4. The policy learning in RLHF is more challenging than conventional problems
studied in IRL due to their high action dimensionality and feedback sparsity.
5. The main superiority of PPO over off-policy value-based methods is its
stability gained from (almost) on-policy data and conservative policy updates.
Related papers
- ARES: Alternating Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning for Enhanced Multi-Modal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Through Diverse AI Feedback [13.154512864498912]
We propose a two-stage algorithm ARES that Alternates REinforcement Learning (RL) and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
First, we request the Teacher to score how much each sentence contributes to solving the problem in a Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
Second, we ask the Teacher to correct the wrong reasoning after the RL stage. With the correction feedback, we stabilize the RL fine-tuned model through SFT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T07:20:11Z) - Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL? [70.54708989409409]
We show that the choice of a policy extraction algorithm significantly affects the performance and scalability of offline RL.
We propose two simple test-time policy improvement methods and show that these methods lead to better performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T17:07:49Z) - RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF [79.83927049253924]
We present the workflow of Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in this technical report.
RLHF is widely reported to outperform its offline counterpart by a large margin in the recent large language model (LLM) literature.
We show that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and iterative RLHF can obtain state-of-the-art performance with fully open-source datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T15:50:39Z) - Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learning [38.17625148525193]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (textbfRLHF) has emerged as a dominant approach for aligning LLM outputs with human preferences.
Inspired by the success of RLHF, we study the performance of multiple algorithms that learn from feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T16:36:29Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHF [127.35607931337019]
We study the issue of reward hacking on the response length, a challenge emerging in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.
A well-formatted, verbose but less helpful response from the LLMs can often deceive LLMs or even human evaluators to achieve high scores.
Our approach almost eliminates the reward correlation with length, and improves the obtained policy by a significant margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-11T22:40:12Z) - RL$^3$: Boosting Meta Reinforcement Learning via RL inside RL$^2$ [12.111848705677142]
We propose RL$3$, a hybrid approach that incorporates action-values, learned per task through traditional RL, in the inputs to meta-RL.
We show that RL$3$ earns greater cumulative reward in the long term, compared to RL$2$, while maintaining data-efficiency in the short term, and generalizes better to out-of-distribution tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T04:16:16Z) - Efficient Diffusion Policies for Offline Reinforcement Learning [85.73757789282212]
Diffsuion-QL significantly boosts the performance of offline RL by representing a policy with a diffusion model.
We propose efficient diffusion policy (EDP) to overcome these two challenges.
EDP constructs actions from corrupted ones at training to avoid running the sampling chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T17:55:21Z) - RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning? [77.91045677562802]
Recent work has shown that supervised learning alone, without temporal difference (TD) learning, can be remarkably effective for offline RL.
In every environment suite we consider simply maximizing likelihood with two-layer feedforward is competitive.
They also probe the limits of existing RvS methods, which are comparatively weak on random data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T18:55:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.