Understanding the Humans Behind Online Misinformation: An Observational Study Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08483v2
• Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:43:52 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Humans Behind Online Misinformation: An Observational Study Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Authors: Mohit Chandra, Anush Mattapalli, Munmun De Choudhury
• Abstract summary: We conduct a large-scale observational study analyzing over 32 million COVID-19 tweets and 16 million historical timeline tweets. We focus on understanding the behavior and psychology of users disseminating misinformation during COVID-19 and its relationship with the historical inclinations towards sharing misinformation on Non-COVID domains before the pandemic.
• Score: 12.873747057824833
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of online misinformation has emerged as one of the biggest threats to society. Considerable efforts have focused on building misinformation detection models, still the perils of misinformation remain abound. Mitigating online misinformation and its ramifications requires a holistic approach that encompasses not only an understanding of its intricate landscape in relation to the complex issue and topic-rich information ecosystem online, but also the psychological drivers of individuals behind it. Adopting a time series analytic technique and robust causal inference-based design, we conduct a large-scale observational study analyzing over 32 million COVID-19 tweets and 16 million historical timeline tweets. We focus on understanding the behavior and psychology of users disseminating misinformation during COVID-19 and its relationship with the historical inclinations towards sharing misinformation on Non-COVID domains before the pandemic. Our analysis underscores the intricacies inherent to cross-domain misinformation, and highlights that users' historical inclination toward sharing misinformation is positively associated with their present behavior pertaining to misinformation sharing on emergent topics and beyond. This work may serve as a valuable foundation for designing user-centric inoculation strategies and ecologically-grounded agile interventions for effectively tackling online misinformation.

Related papers

• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Visual Selective Attention System to Intervene User Attention in Sharing COVID-19 Misinformation [2.7393821783237184]
  This study aims to intervene in the user's attention with a visual selective attention approach. The results are expected to be the basis for developing social media applications to combat the negative impact of the infodemic COVID-19 misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T08:41:03Z)
• Characterizing User Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter [40.0762273487125]
  This study attempts to answer it who constitutes the population vulnerable to the online misinformation in the pandemic. We distinguish different types of users, ranging from social bots to humans with various level of engagement with COVID-related misinformation. We then identify users' online features and situational predictors that correlate with their susceptibility to COVID-19 misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T13:31:15Z)
• Categorising Fine-to-Coarse Grained Misinformation: An Empirical Study of COVID-19 Infodemic [6.137022734902771]
  We introduce a fine-grained annotated misinformation tweets dataset including social behaviours annotation. The dataset not only allows social behaviours analysis but also suitable for both evidence-based or non-evidence-based misinformation classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T12:17:53Z)
• Disinformation in the Online Information Ecosystem: Detection, Mitigation and Challenges [35.0667998623823]
  A large fraction of the common public turn to social media platforms for news and even information regarding highly concerning issues such as COVID-19 symptoms. There is a significant amount of ongoing research in the directions of disinformation detection and mitigation. We discuss the online disinformation problem, focusing on the recent 'infodemic' in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-18T21:44:23Z)
• Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
  We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)
• Characterizing COVID-19 Misinformation Communities Using a Novel Twitter Dataset [9.60966128833701]
  We present a methodology and analyses to characterize the two competing COVID-19 misinformation communities online. Our analyses show that COVID-19 misinformed communities are denser, and more organized than informed communities. Our sociolinguistic analyses suggest that COVID-19 informed users tend to use more narratives than misinformed users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-03T11:44:22Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
• Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements [55.33496599723126]
  disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth. Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.