Target Variable Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09440v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 23:12:21 GMT
• Title: Target Variable Engineering
• Authors: Jessica Clark
• Abstract summary: We compare the predictive performance of regression models trained to predict numeric targets vs. classifiers trained to predict their binarized counterparts. We find that regression requires significantly more computational effort to converge upon the optimal performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How does the formulation of a target variable affect performance within the ML pipeline? The experiments in this study examine numeric targets that have been binarized by comparing against a threshold. We compare the predictive performance of regression models trained to predict the numeric targets vs. classifiers trained to predict their binarized counterparts. Specifically, we make this comparison at every point of a randomized hyperparameter optimization search to understand the effect of computational resource budget on the tradeoff between the two. We find that regression requires significantly more computational effort to converge upon the optimal performance, and is more sensitive to both randomness and heuristic choices in the training process. Although classification can and does benefit from systematic hyperparameter tuning and model selection, the improvements are much less than for regression. This work comprises the first systematic comparison of regression and classification within the framework of computational resource requirements. Our findings contribute to calls for greater replicability and efficiency within the ML pipeline for the sake of building more sustainable and robust AI systems.

Related papers

• Meta-Learning with Generalized Ridge Regression: High-dimensional Asymptotics, Optimality and Hyper-covariance Estimation [14.194212772887699]
  We consider meta-learning within the framework of high-dimensional random-effects linear models. We show the precise behavior of the predictive risk for a new test task when the data dimension grows proportionally to the number of samples per task. We propose and analyze an estimator inverse random regression coefficients based on data from the training tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T21:18:43Z)
• Efficient Transferability Assessment for Selection of Pre-trained Detectors [63.21514888618542]
  This paper studies the efficient transferability assessment of pre-trained object detectors. We build up a detector transferability benchmark which contains a large and diverse zoo of pre-trained detectors. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in assessing transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T14:23:23Z)
• Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlation [65.83104529677234]
  We study the learning process of a two-layer nonlinear convolutional neural network in the presence of spurious features. Our analysis suggests that imbalanced data groups and easily learnable spurious features can lead to the dominance of spurious features during the learning process. We propose a new training algorithm called PDE that efficiently enhances the model's robustness for a better worst-group performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T05:44:06Z)
• End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processes [52.818579746354665]
  This paper proposes the first end-to-end differentiable meta-BO framework that generalises neural processes to learn acquisition functions via transformer architectures. We enable this end-to-end framework with reinforcement learning (RL) to tackle the lack of labelled acquisition data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T10:58:46Z)
• Winner-Take-All Column Row Sampling for Memory Efficient Adaptation of Language Model [89.8764435351222]
  We propose a new family of unbiased estimators called WTA-CRS, for matrix production with reduced variance. Our work provides both theoretical and experimental evidence that, in the context of tuning transformers, our proposed estimators exhibit lower variance compared to existing ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T15:52:08Z)
• FAStEN: An Efficient Adaptive Method for Feature Selection and Estimation in High-Dimensional Functional Regressions [7.674715791336311]
  We propose a new, flexible and ultra-efficient approach to perform feature selection in a sparse function-on-function regression problem. We show how to extend it to the scalar-on-function framework. We present an application to brain fMRI data from the AOMIC PIOP1 study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T19:41:17Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks [37.922783300635864]
  One machine-learning algorithm A outperforms another one B ideally calls for multiple trials optimizing the learning pipeline over sources of variation. This is prohibitively expensive, and corners are cut to reach conclusions. We model the whole benchmarking process, revealing that variance due to data sampling, parameter initialization and hyper parameter choice impact markedly the results. We show a counter-intuitive result that adding more sources of variation to an imperfect estimator approaches better the ideal estimator at a 51 times reduction in compute cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T22:39:49Z)
• How much progress have we made in neural network training? A New Evaluation Protocol for Benchmarking Optimizers [86.36020260204302]
  We propose a new benchmarking protocol to evaluate both end-to-end efficiency and data-addition training efficiency. A human study is conducted to show that our evaluation protocol matches human tuning behavior better than the random search. We then apply the proposed benchmarking framework to 7s and various tasks, including computer vision, natural language processing, reinforcement learning, and graph mining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:46:39Z)
• A Locally Adaptive Interpretable Regression [7.4267694612331905]
  Linear regression is one of the most interpretable prediction models. In this work, we introduce a locally adaptive interpretable regression (LoAIR) Our model achieves comparable or better predictive performance than the other state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T09:26:14Z)
• Gaussian Process Boosting [13.162429430481982]
  We introduce a novel way to combine boosting with Gaussian process and mixed effects models. We obtain increased prediction accuracy compared to existing approaches on simulated and real-world data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T13:19:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.