QADYNAMICS: Training Dynamics-Driven Synthetic QA Diagnostic for Zero-Shot Commonsense Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11303v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:34 GMT
• Title: QADYNAMICS: Training Dynamics-Driven Synthetic QA Diagnostic for Zero-Shot Commonsense Question Answering
• Authors: Haochen Shi, Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Baixuan Xu, Wenxuan Ding, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song
• Abstract summary: State-of-the-art approaches fine-tune language models on QA pairs constructed from CommonSense Knowledge Bases. We propose QADYNAMICS, a training dynamics-driven framework for QA diagnostics and refinement.
• Score: 48.25449258017601
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Zero-shot commonsense Question-Answering (QA) requires models to reason about general situations beyond specific benchmarks. State-of-the-art approaches fine-tune language models on QA pairs constructed from CommonSense Knowledge Bases (CSKBs) to equip the models with more commonsense knowledge in a QA context. However, current QA synthesis protocols may introduce noise from the CSKBs and generate ungrammatical questions and false negative options, which impede the model's ability to generalize. To address these issues, we propose QADYNAMICS, a training dynamics-driven framework for QA diagnostics and refinement. Our approach analyzes the training dynamics of each QA pair at both the question level and option level, discarding machine-detectable artifacts by removing uninformative QA pairs and mislabeled or false-negative options. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which outperforms all baselines while using only 33% of the synthetic data, even including LLMs such as ChatGPT. Moreover, expert evaluations confirm that our framework significantly improves the quality of QA synthesis. Our codes and model checkpoints are available at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/QaDynamics.

Related papers

• An Empirical Comparison of LM-based Question and Answer Generation Methods [79.31199020420827]
  Question and answer generation (QAG) consists of generating a set of question-answer pairs given a context. In this paper, we establish baselines with three different QAG methodologies that leverage sequence-to-sequence language model (LM) fine-tuning. Experiments show that an end-to-end QAG model, which is computationally light at both training and inference times, is generally robust and outperforms other more convoluted approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:59:53Z)
• Closed-book Question Generation via Contrastive Learning [20.644215991166895]
  We propose a new QG model empowered by a contrastive learning module and an answer reconstruction module. We show how to leverage the proposed model to improve existing closed-book QA systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T06:45:46Z)
• Synthetic Question Value Estimation for Domain Adaptation of Question Answering [31.003053719921628]
  We introduce a novel idea of training a question value estimator (QVE) that directly estimates the usefulness of synthetic questions for improving the target-domain QA performance. By using such questions and only around 15% of the human annotations on the target domain, we can achieve comparable performance to the fully-supervised baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T20:22:31Z)
• Improving Unsupervised Question Answering via Summarization-Informed Question Generation [47.96911338198302]
  Question Generation (QG) is the task of generating a plausible question for a passage, answer> pair. We make use of freely available news summary data, transforming declarative sentences into appropriate questions using dependency parsing, named entity recognition and semantic role labeling. The resulting questions are then combined with the original news articles to train an end-to-end neural QG model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T13:08:43Z)
• CliniQG4QA: Generating Diverse Questions for Domain Adaptation of Clinical Question Answering [27.45623324582005]
  Clinical question answering (QA) aims to automatically answer questions from medical professionals based on clinical texts. We propose CliniQG4QA, which leverages question generation (QG) to synthesize QA pairs on new clinical contexts. In order to generate diverse types of questions that are essential for training QA models, we introduce a seq2seq-based question phrase prediction (QPP) module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T02:06:10Z)
• Generating Diverse and Consistent QA pairs from Contexts with Information-Maximizing Hierarchical Conditional VAEs [62.71505254770827]
  We propose a conditional variational autoencoder (HCVAE) for generating QA pairs given unstructured texts as contexts. Our model obtains impressive performance gains over all baselines on both tasks, using only a fraction of data for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T08:26:06Z)
• Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA [95.9105154311491]
  We introduce two approaches to improve unsupervised Question Answering (QA) First, we harvest lexically and syntactically divergent questions from Wikipedia to automatically construct a corpus of question-answer pairs (named as RefQA) Second, we take advantage of the QA model to extract more appropriate answers, which iteratively refines data over RefQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T15:56:06Z)
• Template-Based Question Generation from Retrieved Sentences for Improved Unsupervised Question Answering [98.48363619128108]
  We propose an unsupervised approach to training QA models with generated pseudo-training data. We show that generating questions for QA training by applying a simple template on a related, retrieved sentence rather than the original context sentence improves downstream QA performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:57:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.