Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case Study in an Australian National Research Data Catalogue

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11318v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:52:33 GMT
• Title: Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case Study in an Australian National Research Data Catalogue
• Authors: Shiwei Zhang, Mingfang Wu, Xiuzhen Zhang
• Abstract summary: In support of open and reproducible research, there has been a rapidly increasing number of datasets made available for research. As the availability of datasets increases, it becomes more important to have quality metadata for discovering and reusing them. This paper proposes to leverage large language models (LLMs) for cost-effective annotation of subject metadata through the LLM-based in-context learning.
• Score: 18.325675189960833
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In support of open and reproducible research, there has been a rapidly increasing number of datasets made available for research. As the availability of datasets increases, it becomes more important to have quality metadata for discovering and reusing them. Yet, it is a common issue that datasets often lack quality metadata due to limited resources for data curation. Meanwhile, technologies such as artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) are progressing rapidly. Recently, systems based on these technologies, such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated promising capabilities for certain data curation tasks. This paper proposes to leverage LLMs for cost-effective annotation of subject metadata through the LLM-based in-context learning. Our method employs GPT-3.5 with prompts designed for annotating subject metadata, demonstrating promising performance in automatic metadata annotation. However, models based on in-context learning cannot acquire discipline-specific rules, resulting in lower performance in several categories. This limitation arises from the limited contextual information available for subject inference. To the best of our knowledge, we are introducing, for the first time, an in-context learning method that harnesses large language models for automated subject metadata annotation.

Related papers

• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science. Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• CLAIM Your Data: Enhancing Imputation Accuracy with Contextual Large Language Models [0.18416014644193068]
  This paper introduces the Contextual Language model for Accurate Imputation Method (CLAIM) Unlike traditional imputation methods, CLAIM utilizes contextually relevant natural language descriptors to fill missing values. Our evaluations across diverse datasets and missingness patterns reveal CLAIM's superior performance over existing imputation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T00:08:29Z)
• DataAgent: Evaluating Large Language Models' Ability to Answer Zero-Shot, Natural Language Queries [0.0]
  We evaluate OpenAI's GPT-3.5 as a "Language Data Scientist" (LDS) The model was tested on a diverse set of benchmark datasets to evaluate its performance across multiple standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T22:59:34Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• Large Language Models for Data Annotation: A Survey [49.8318827245266]
  The emergence of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) presents an unprecedented opportunity to automate the complicated process of data annotation. This survey includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T00:44:04Z)
• Query of CC: Unearthing Large Scale Domain-Specific Knowledge from Public Corpora [104.16648246740543]
  We propose an efficient data collection method based on large language models. The method bootstraps seed information through a large language model and retrieves related data from public corpora. It not only collects knowledge-related data for specific domains but unearths the data with potential reasoning procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T03:38:23Z)
• AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators [98.11286353828525]
  GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. We propose AnnoLLM, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. We build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:03:21Z)
• Metadata Shaping: Natural Language Annotations for the Tail [4.665656172490747]
  Language models (LMs) have made remarkable progress, but still struggle to generalize beyond the training data to rare linguistic patterns. We propose metadata shaping, a method in which readily available metadata, such as entity descriptions and categorical tags, are appended to examples based on information theoretic metrics. With no changes to the LM whatsoever, metadata shaping exceeds the BERT-baseline by up to 5.3 F1 points, and achieves or competes with state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T01:00:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.