Detecting and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Binary Classification using Causal Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12421v2
• Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 00:27:00 GMT
• Title: Detecting and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Binary Classification using Causal Modeling
• Authors: Wendy Hui, Wai Kwong Lau
• Abstract summary: We show that gender bias in the prediction model is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the causal model in mitigating gender bias by cross-validation. Our novel approach is intuitive, easy-to-use, and can be implemented using existing statistical software tools such as "lavaan" in R.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper proposes the use of causal modeling to detect and mitigate algorithmic bias. We provide a brief description of causal modeling and a general overview of our approach. We then use the Adult dataset, which is available for download from the UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository, to develop (1) a prediction model, which is treated as a black box, and (2) a causal model for bias mitigation. In this paper, we focus on gender bias and the problem of binary classification. We show that gender bias in the prediction model is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the causal model in mitigating gender bias by cross-validation. Furthermore, we show that the overall classification accuracy is improved slightly. Our novel approach is intuitive, easy-to-use, and can be implemented using existing statistical software tools such as "lavaan" in R. Hence, it enhances explainability and promotes trust.

Related papers

• Less can be more: representational vs. stereotypical gender bias in facial expression recognition [3.9698529891342207]
  Machine learning models can inherit biases from their training data, leading to discriminatory or inaccurate predictions. This paper investigates the propagation of demographic biases from datasets into machine learning models. We focus on the gender demographic component, analyzing two types of bias: representational and stereotypical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T09:26:49Z)
• Utilizing Adversarial Examples for Bias Mitigation and Accuracy Enhancement [3.0820287240219795]
  We propose a novel approach to mitigate biases in computer vision models by utilizing counterfactual generation and fine-tuning. Our approach leverages a curriculum learning framework combined with a fine-grained adversarial loss to fine-tune the model using adversarial examples. We validate our approach through both qualitative and quantitative assessments, demonstrating improved bias mitigation and accuracy compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T00:41:32Z)
• Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness [100.36114135663836]
  We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets. Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize. Data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T07:54:50Z)
• Mitigating Nonlinear Algorithmic Bias in Binary Classification [0.0]
  This paper proposes the use of causal modeling to detect and mitigate bias that is nonlinear in the protected attribute. We show that the probability of getting correctly classified as "low risk" is lowest among young people. Based on the fitted causal model, the debiased- probability estimates are computed, showing improved fairness with little impact on overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T01:26:22Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• Data augmentation and explainability for bias discovery and mitigation in deep learning [0.0]
  This dissertation explores the impact of bias in deep neural networks and presents methods for reducing its influence on model performance. The first part begins by categorizing and describing potential sources of bias and errors in data and models, with a particular focus on bias in machine learning pipelines. The next chapter outlines a taxonomy and methods of Explainable AI as a way to justify predictions and control and improve the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T11:02:27Z)
• Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
  Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age. A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data. In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging [7.266116143672294]
  Gopher is a system that produces compact, interpretable, and causal explanations for bias or unexpected model behavior. We introduce the concept of causal responsibility that quantifies the extent to which intervening on training data by removing or updating subsets of it can resolve the bias. Building on this concept, we develop an efficient approach for generating the top-k patterns that explain model bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T20:10:00Z)
• Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them [111.17078939377313]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models often learn to model dataset biases and surface form correlations instead of features that target the intended task. Previous work has demonstrated effective methods to circumvent these issues when knowledge of the bias is available. We show a method for training models that learn to ignore these problematic correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T16:10:54Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.