Exploring Graph Neural Networks for Indian Legal Judgment Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12800v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:55:51 GMT
• Title: Exploring Graph Neural Networks for Indian Legal Judgment Prediction
• Authors: Mann Khatri, Mirza Yusuf, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
• Abstract summary: This research paper centres on developing a graph neural network-based model to address the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) problem. We explore various embeddings as model features, while nodes such as time nodes and judicial acts were added and pruned to evaluate the model's performance. A link prediction task is also conducted to assess the model's proficiency in anticipating connections between two specified nodes.
• Score: 39.0233340304095
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The burdensome impact of a skewed judges-to-cases ratio on the judicial system manifests in an overwhelming backlog of pending cases alongside an ongoing influx of new ones. To tackle this issue and expedite the judicial process, the proposition of an automated system capable of suggesting case outcomes based on factual evidence and precedent from past cases gains significance. This research paper centres on developing a graph neural network-based model to address the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) problem, recognizing the intrinsic graph structure of judicial cases and making it a binary node classification problem. We explored various embeddings as model features, while nodes such as time nodes and judicial acts were added and pruned to evaluate the model's performance. The study is done while considering the ethical dimension of fairness in these predictions, considering gender and name biases. A link prediction task is also conducted to assess the model's proficiency in anticipating connections between two specified nodes. By harnessing the capabilities of graph neural networks and incorporating fairness analyses, this research aims to contribute insights towards streamlining the adjudication process, enhancing judicial efficiency, and fostering a more equitable legal landscape, ultimately alleviating the strain imposed by mounting case backlogs. Our best-performing model with XLNet pre-trained embeddings as its features gives the macro F1 score of 75% for the LJP task. For link prediction, the same set of features is the best performing giving ROC of more than 80%

Related papers

• Editable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models [52.66450426729818]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases. FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance. This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
  We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results. We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z)
• Fairness-Aware Graph Neural Networks: A Survey [53.41838868516936]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become increasingly important due to their representational power and state-of-the-art predictive performance. GNNs suffer from fairness issues that arise as a result of the underlying graph data and the fundamental aggregation mechanism. In this article, we examine and categorize fairness techniques for improving the fairness of GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T08:09:06Z)
• Fairify: Fairness Verification of Neural Networks [7.673007415383724]
  We propose Fairify, an approach to verify individual fairness property in neural network (NN) models. Our approach adopts input partitioning and then prunes the NN for each partition to provide fairness certification or counterexample. We evaluated Fairify on 25 real-world neural networks collected from four different sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:31:06Z)
• Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition [107.58227666024791]
  Face recognition systems are widely deployed in safety-critical applications, including law enforcement. They exhibit bias across a range of socio-demographic dimensions, such as gender and race. Previous works on bias mitigation largely focused on pre-processing the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T15:46:05Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes [0.0]
  We have used AI classifiers to predict judicial outcomes in the Brazilian legal system. These texts formed a dataset of second-degree murder and active corruption cases. Our research showed that Regression Trees, Gated Recurring Units and Hierarchical Attention Networks presented higher metrics for different subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T16:24:34Z)
• FETA: Fairness Enforced Verifying, Training, and Predicting Algorithms for Neural Networks [9.967054059014691]
  We study the problem of verifying, training, and guaranteeing individual fairness of neural network models. A popular approach for enforcing fairness is to translate a fairness notion into constraints over the parameters of the model. We develop a counterexample-guided post-processing technique to provably enforce fairness constraints at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T15:06:11Z)
• ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation [3.285073688021526]
  We propose the task of Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation (CJPE) CJPE requires an automated system to predict an explainable outcome of a case. Our best prediction model has an accuracy of 78% versus 94% for human legal experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T03:07:32Z)
• Predictive Business Process Monitoring via Generative Adversarial Nets: The Case of Next Event Prediction [0.026249027950824504]
  This paper proposes a novel adversarial training framework to address the problem of next event prediction. It works by putting one neural network against the other in a two-player game which leads to predictions that are indistinguishable from the ground truth. It systematically outperforms all baselines both in terms of accuracy and earliness of the prediction, despite using a simple network architecture and a naive feature encoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T08:31:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.