Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: Are we ready?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14545v2
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:56:05 GMT
- Title: Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: Are we ready?
- Authors: V Vien Lee, Stephanie C. C. van der Lubbe, Lay Hoon Goh and Jose M.
Valderas
- Abstract summary: ChatGPT is an advanced natural language processing tool with growing applications across various disciplines in medical research.
This viewpoint explores the utilization of ChatGPT in three core phases of thematic analysis within a medical context.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: ChatGPT is an advanced natural language processing tool with growing
applications across various disciplines in medical research. Thematic analysis,
a qualitative research method to identify and interpret patterns in data, is
one application that stands to benefit from this technology. This viewpoint
explores the utilization of ChatGPT in three core phases of thematic analysis
within a medical context: 1) direct coding of transcripts, 2) generating themes
from a predefined list of codes, and 3) preprocessing quotes for manuscript
inclusion. Additionally, we explore the potential of ChatGPT to generate
interview transcripts, which may be used for training purposes. We assess the
strengths and limitations of using ChatGPT in these roles, highlighting areas
where human intervention remains necessary. Overall, we argue that ChatGPT can
function as a valuable tool during analysis, enhancing the efficiency of the
thematic analysis and offering additional insights into the qualitative data.
Related papers
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith [63.8746084667206]
We propose an effective ChatGPT detector named DEMASQ, which accurately identifies ChatGPT-generated content.
Our method addresses two critical factors: (i) the distinct biases in text composition observed in human- and machine-generated content and (ii) the alterations made by humans to evade previous detection methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T21:13:05Z) - Detecting ChatGPT: A Survey of the State of Detecting ChatGPT-Generated
Text [1.9643748953805937]
generative language models can potentially deceive by generating artificial text that appears to be human-generated.
This survey provides an overview of the current approaches employed to differentiate between texts generated by humans and ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T13:05:20Z) - Is ChatGPT Involved in Texts? Measure the Polish Ratio to Detect
ChatGPT-Generated Text [48.36706154871577]
We introduce a novel dataset termed HPPT (ChatGPT-polished academic abstracts)
It diverges from extant corpora by comprising pairs of human-written and ChatGPT-polished abstracts instead of purely ChatGPT-generated texts.
We also propose the "Polish Ratio" method, an innovative measure of the degree of modification made by ChatGPT compared to the original human-written text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-21T06:38:37Z) - Ethical Aspects of ChatGPT in Software Engineering Research [4.0594888788503205]
ChatGPT can improve Software Engineering (SE) research practices by offering efficient, accessible information analysis and synthesis based on natural language interactions.
However, ChatGPT could bring ethical challenges, encompassing plagiarism, privacy, data security, and the risk of generating biased or potentially detrimental data.
This research aims to fill the given gap by elaborating on the key elements: motivators, demotivators, and ethical principles of using ChatGPT in SE research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T06:13:21Z) - On the Detectability of ChatGPT Content: Benchmarking, Methodology, and Evaluation through the Lens of Academic Writing [10.534162347659514]
We develop a deep neural framework named CheckGPT to better capture the subtle and deep semantic and linguistic patterns in ChatGPT written literature.
To evaluate the detectability of ChatGPT content, we conduct extensive experiments on the transferability, prompt engineering, and robustness of CheckGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T12:33:24Z) - Uncovering the Potential of ChatGPT for Discourse Analysis in Dialogue:
An Empirical Study [51.079100495163736]
This paper systematically inspects ChatGPT's performance in two discourse analysis tasks: topic segmentation and discourse parsing.
ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in identifying topic structures in general-domain conversations yet struggles considerably in specific-domain conversations.
Our deeper investigation indicates that ChatGPT can give more reasonable topic structures than human annotations but only linearly parses the hierarchical rhetorical structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-15T07:14:41Z) - Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Texts [8.53416950968806]
This research is among the first studies on responsible and ethical AIGC (Artificial Intelligence Generated Content) in medicine.
We focus on analyzing the differences between medical texts written by human experts and generated by ChatGPT.
In the next step, we analyze the linguistic features of these two types of content and uncover differences in vocabulary, part-of-speech, dependency, sentiment, perplexity, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-23T07:38:07Z) - To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection.
We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains.
Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z) - Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study [121.77986688862302]
We provide a preliminary meta-evaluation on ChatGPT to show its reliability as an NLG metric.
Experimental results show that compared with previous automatic metrics, ChatGPT achieves state-of-the-art or competitive correlation with human judgments.
We hope our preliminary study could prompt the emergence of a general-purposed reliable NLG metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T16:57:20Z) - Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot.
Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community.
It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.