Evaluating Pre-trained Language Models for Repairing API Misuses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16390v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 06:10:22 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Pre-trained Language Models for Repairing API Misuses
• Authors: Ting Zhang and Ivana Clairine Irsan and Ferdian Thung and David Lo and Asankhaya Sharma and Lingxiao Jiang
• Abstract summary: API misuses often lead to software bugs, crashes, and vulnerabilities. In a recent study, test-suite-based automatic program repair (APR) tools were found to be ineffective in repairing API misuses. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study on 11 learning-aided APR tools, which include 9 of the state-of-the-art general-purpose PLMs and two APR tools. Our results show that PLMs perform better than the studied APR tools in repairing API misuses.
• Score: 15.17607624946389
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: API misuses often lead to software bugs, crashes, and vulnerabilities. While several API misuse detectors have been proposed, there are no automatic repair tools specifically designed for this purpose. In a recent study, test-suite-based automatic program repair (APR) tools were found to be ineffective in repairing API misuses. Still, since the study focused on non-learning-aided APR tools, it remains unknown whether learning-aided APR tools are capable of fixing API misuses. In recent years, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have succeeded greatly in many natural language processing tasks. There is a rising interest in applying PLMs to APR. However, there has not been any study that investigates the effectiveness of PLMs in repairing API misuse. To fill this gap, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study on 11 learning-aided APR tools, which include 9 of the state-of-the-art general-purpose PLMs and two APR tools. We evaluate these models with an API-misuse repair dataset, consisting of two variants. Our results show that PLMs perform better than the studied APR tools in repairing API misuses. Among the 9 pre-trained models tested, CodeT5 is the best performer in the exact match. We also offer insights and potential exploration directions for future research.

Related papers

• ExploraCoder: Advancing code generation for multiple unseen APIs via planning and chained exploration [70.26807758443675]
  ExploraCoder is a training-free framework that empowers large language models to invoke unseen APIs in code solution. We show that ExploraCoder significantly improves performance for models lacking prior API knowledge, achieving an absolute increase of 11.24% over niave RAG approaches and 14.07% over pretraining methods in pass@10.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T19:00:15Z)
• Automated Program Repair: Emerging trends pose and expose problems for benchmarks [7.437224586066947]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used to generate software patches. Evaluations and comparisons must take care to ensure that results are valid and likely to generalize. This is especially true for LLMs, whose large and often poorly-disclosed training datasets may include problems on which they are evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T23:09:43Z)
• Revisiting Unnaturalness for Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Language Models [9.454475517867817]
  We propose a patch-naturalness measurement, entropy-delta, to improve the efficiency of template-based repair techniques. Our proposed method can rank correct patches more effectively than state-of-the-art machine learning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T17:12:45Z)
• A Novel Approach for Automatic Program Repair using Round-Trip Translation with Large Language Models [50.86686630756207]
  Research shows that grammatical mistakes in a sentence can be corrected by translating it to another language and back. Current generative models for Automatic Program Repair (APR) are pre-trained on source code and fine-tuned for repair. This paper proposes bypassing the fine-tuning step and using Round-Trip Translation (RTT): translation of code from one programming language to another programming or natural language, and back.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T22:36:31Z)
• The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluation [93.01964988474755]
  AutoMQM is a prompting technique which asks large language models to identify and categorize errors in translations. We study the impact of labeled data through in-context learning and finetuning. We then evaluate AutoMQM with PaLM-2 models, and we find that it improves performance compared to just prompting for scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T17:17:21Z)
• ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs [104.37772295581088]
  Open-source large language models (LLMs), e.g., LLaMA, remain significantly limited in tool-use capabilities. We introduce ToolLLM, a general tool-usetuning encompassing data construction, model training, and evaluation. We first present ToolBench, an instruction-tuning framework for tool use, which is constructed automatically using ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T15:56:53Z)
• API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs [84.45284695156771]
  API-Bank is a groundbreaking benchmark for tool-augmented Large Language Models. We develop a run evaluation system consisting of 73 API tools. We construct a comprehensive training set containing 1,888 tool-use dialogues from 2,138 APIs spanning 1,000 distinct domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T14:05:32Z)
• Revisiting the Plastic Surgery Hypothesis via Large Language Models [13.488029636215089]
  We propose FitRepair, which combines the direct usage of Large Language Models with two domain-specific fine-tuning strategies and one prompting strategy for more powerful APR. Our experiments on the widely studied Defects4j 1.2 and 2.0 datasets show that FitRepair fixes 89 and 44 bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T20:33:46Z)
• Improving Automated Program Repair with Domain Adaptation [0.0]
  Automated Program Repair (APR) is defined as the process of fixing a bug/defect in the source code, by an automated tool. APR tools have recently experienced promising results by leveraging state-of-the-art Neural Language Processing (NLP) techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T23:52:09Z)
• Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Models [13.694803023685175]
  Automated Program Repair (APR) aims to help developers automatically patch software bugs. PLMs, trained using billions of text/code tokens, can potentially help avoid this issue. We select 9 recent state-of-the-art PLMs, including both generative and infilling models, ranging from 125M to 20B in size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T17:18:02Z)
• BigIssue: A Realistic Bug Localization Benchmark [89.8240118116093]
  BigIssue is a benchmark for realistic bug localization. We provide a general benchmark with a diversity of real and synthetic Java bugs. We hope to advance the state of the art in bug localization, in turn improving APR performance and increasing its applicability to the modern development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T20:17:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.