Is Robustness Transferable across Languages in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20162v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:10:31 GMT
• Title: Is Robustness Transferable across Languages in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation?
• Authors: Leiyu Pan, Supryadi and Deyi Xiong
• Abstract summary: We investigate the transferability of robustness across different languages in multilingual neural machine translation. Our findings demonstrate that the robustness gained in one translation direction can indeed transfer to other translation directions.
• Score: 45.04661608619081
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Robustness, the ability of models to maintain performance in the face of perturbations, is critical for developing reliable NLP systems. Recent studies have shown promising results in improving the robustness of models through adversarial training and data augmentation. However, in machine translation, most of these studies have focused on bilingual machine translation with a single translation direction. In this paper, we investigate the transferability of robustness across different languages in multilingual neural machine translation. We propose a robustness transfer analysis protocol and conduct a series of experiments. In particular, we use character-, word-, and multi-level noises to attack the specific translation direction of the multilingual neural machine translation model and evaluate the robustness of other translation directions. Our findings demonstrate that the robustness gained in one translation direction can indeed transfer to other translation directions. Additionally, we empirically find scenarios where robustness to character-level noise and word-level noise is more likely to transfer.

Related papers

• Can Machine Translation Bridge Multilingual Pretraining and Cross-lingual Transfer Learning? [8.630930380973489]
  This paper investigates the potential benefits of employing machine translation as a continued training objective to enhance language representation learning. Our results show that, contrary to expectations, machine translation as the continued training fails to enhance cross-lingual representation learning. We conclude that explicit sentence-level alignment in the cross-lingual scenario is detrimental to cross-lingual transfer pretraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T13:53:04Z)
• How Robust is Neural Machine Translation to Language Imbalance in Multilingual Tokenizer Training? [86.48323488619629]
  We analyze how translation performance changes as the data ratios among languages vary in the tokenizer training corpus. We find that while relatively better performance is often observed when languages are more equally sampled, the downstream performance is more robust to language imbalance than we usually expected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T17:50:36Z)
• Oolong: Investigating What Makes Transfer Learning Hard with Controlled Studies [21.350999136803843]
  We systematically transform the language of the GLUE benchmark, altering one axis of crosslingual variation at a time. We find that models can largely recover from syntactic-style shifts, but cannot recover from vocabulary misalignment. Our experiments provide insights into the factors of cross-lingual transfer that researchers should most focus on when designing language transfer scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T19:00:39Z)
• DEEP: DEnoising Entity Pre-training for Neural Machine Translation [123.6686940355937]
  It has been shown that machine translation models usually generate poor translations for named entities that are infrequent in the training corpus. We propose DEEP, a DEnoising Entity Pre-training method that leverages large amounts of monolingual data and a knowledge base to improve named entity translation accuracy within sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-14T17:28:09Z)
• Rethinking Zero-shot Neural Machine Translation: From a Perspective of Latent Variables [28.101782382170306]
  We introduce a denoising autoencoder objective based on pivot language into traditional training objective to improve the translation accuracy on zero-shot directions. We demonstrate that the proposed method is able to effectively eliminate the spurious correlations and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods with a remarkable performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T07:18:53Z)
• Modelling Latent Translations for Cross-Lingual Transfer [47.61502999819699]
  We propose a new technique that integrates both steps of the traditional pipeline (translation and classification) into a single model. We evaluate our novel latent translation-based model on a series of multilingual NLU tasks. We report gains for both zero-shot and few-shot learning setups, up to 2.7 accuracy points on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T17:11:27Z)
• It's Easier to Translate out of English than into it: Measuring Neural Translation Difficulty by Cross-Mutual Information [90.35685796083563]
  Cross-mutual information (XMI) is an asymmetric information-theoretic metric of machine translation difficulty. XMI exploits the probabilistic nature of most neural machine translation models. We present the first systematic and controlled study of cross-lingual translation difficulties using modern neural translation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T17:38:48Z)
• Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Transfer Learning [51.66536640084888]
  We show that machine translation can introduce subtle artifacts that have a notable impact in existing cross-lingual models. In natural language inference, translating the premise and the hypothesis independently can reduce the lexical overlap between them. We also improve the state-of-the-art in XNLI for the translate-test and zero-shot approaches by 4.3 and 2.8 points, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T17:54:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.