Learning impartial policies for sequential counterfactual explanations using Deep Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00523v1
• Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 13:50:47 GMT
• Title: Learning impartial policies for sequential counterfactual explanations using Deep Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: E. Panagiotou, E. Ntoutsi
• Abstract summary: Recently Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods have been proposed that seek to learn policies for discovering SCFs, thereby enhancing scalability. In this work, we identify shortcomings in existing methods that can result in policies with undesired properties, such as a bias towards specific actions. We propose to use the output probabilities of the classifier to create a more informative reward, to mitigate this effect.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the field of explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), sequential counterfactual (SCF) examples are often used to alter the decision of a trained classifier by implementing a sequence of modifications to the input instance. Although certain test-time algorithms aim to optimize for each new instance individually, recently Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods have been proposed that seek to learn policies for discovering SCFs, thereby enhancing scalability. As is typical in RL, the formulation of the RL problem, including the specification of state space, actions, and rewards, can often be ambiguous. In this work, we identify shortcomings in existing methods that can result in policies with undesired properties, such as a bias towards specific actions. We propose to use the output probabilities of the classifier to create a more informative reward, to mitigate this effect.

Related papers

• Action-Quantized Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Skill Learning [68.16998247593209]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm provides recipe to convert static behavior datasets into policies that can perform better than the policy that collected the data. In this paper, we propose an adaptive scheme for action quantization. We show that several state-of-the-art offline RL methods such as IQL, CQL, and BRAC improve in performance on benchmarks when combined with our proposed discretization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T06:07:10Z)
• Iteratively Refined Behavior Regularization for Offline Reinforcement Learning [57.10922880400715]
  In this paper, we propose a new algorithm that substantially enhances behavior-regularization based on conservative policy iteration. By iteratively refining the reference policy used for behavior regularization, conservative policy update guarantees gradually improvement. Experimental results on the D4RL benchmark indicate that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art baselines in most tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T07:46:24Z)
• Inapplicable Actions Learning for Knowledge Transfer in Reinforcement Learning [3.194414753332705]
  We show that learning inapplicable actions greatly improves the sample efficiency of RL algorithms. Thanks to the transferability of the knowledge acquired, it can be reused in other tasks and domains to make the learning process more efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T17:45:39Z)
• Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning [68.82380421479675]
  We present a meta algorithm that can use offline data, demonstrations, or a pre-existing policy to initialize an RL policy. In particular, we propose Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning (JSRL), an algorithm that employs two policies to solve tasks. We show via experiments that JSRL is able to significantly outperform existing imitation and reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T17:25:22Z)
• Direct Random Search for Fine Tuning of Deep Reinforcement Learning Policies [5.543220407902113]
  We show that a direct random search is very effective at fine-tuning DRL policies by directly optimizing them using deterministic rollouts. Our results show that this method yields more consistent and higher performing agents on the environments we tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T20:12:46Z)
• Robust Predictable Control [149.71263296079388]
  We show that our method achieves much tighter compression than prior methods, achieving up to 5x higher reward than a standard information bottleneck. We also demonstrate that our method learns policies that are more robust and generalize better to new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T17:29:34Z)
• On Multi-objective Policy Optimization as a Tool for Reinforcement Learning: Case Studies in Offline RL and Finetuning [24.264618706734012]
  We show how to develop novel and more effective deep reinforcement learning algorithms. We focus on offline RL and finetuning as case studies. We introduce Distillation of a Mixture of Experts (DiME) We demonstrate that for offline RL, DiME leads to a simple new algorithm that outperforms state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T14:59:14Z)
• Minimum-Delay Adaptation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning via Online High-Confidence Change-Point Detection [7.685002911021767]
  We introduce an algorithm that efficiently learns policies in non-stationary environments. It analyzes a possibly infinite stream of data and computes, in real-time, high-confidence change-point detection statistics. We show that (i) this algorithm minimizes the delay until unforeseen changes to a context are detected, thereby allowing for rapid responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T01:57:52Z)
• Joint Contrastive Learning with Infinite Possibilities [114.45811348666898]
  This paper explores useful modifications of the recent development in contrastive learning via novel probabilistic modeling. We derive a particular form of contrastive loss named Joint Contrastive Learning (JCL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T16:24:21Z)
• AdaS: Adaptive Scheduling of Stochastic Gradients [50.80697760166045]
  We introduce the notions of textit"knowledge gain" and textit"mapping condition" and propose a new algorithm called Adaptive Scheduling (AdaS) Experimentation reveals that, using the derived metrics, AdaS exhibits: (a) faster convergence and superior generalization over existing adaptive learning methods; and (b) lack of dependence on a validation set to determine when to stop training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T16:36:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.