Divergent Token Metrics: Measuring degradation to prune away LLM components -- and optimize quantization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01544v3
• Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:49:53 GMT
• Title: Divergent Token Metrics: Measuring degradation to prune away LLM components -- and optimize quantization
• Authors: Björn Deiseroth, Max Meuer, Nikolas Gritsch, Constantin Eichenberg, Patrick Schramowski, Matthias Aßenmacher, Kristian Kersting,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces the Divergent Token Metrics (DTMs), a novel approach to assessing compressed Large Language Models (LLMs) DTMs measure token divergences that allow deeper insights into the subtleties of model compression. For quantization, FDTM suggests that more than 80% of parameters can be naively transformed to int8 without special management.
• Score: 21.608651876495596
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped natural language processing with their impressive capabilities. However, their ever-increasing size has raised concerns about their effective deployment and the need for LLM compression. This study introduces the Divergent Token Metrics (DTMs), a novel approach to assessing compressed LLMs, addressing the limitations of traditional perplexity or accuracy measures that fail to accurately reflect text generation quality. DTMs measure token divergences that allow deeper insights into the subtleties of model compression, in particular, when evaluating components' impacts individually. Utilizing the First Divergent Token Metric (FDTM) in model sparsification reveals that 25% of all attention components can be pruned beyond 90% on the Llama-2 model family, still keeping SOTA performance. For quantization, FDTM suggests that more than 80% of parameters can be naively transformed to int8 without special outlier management. These evaluations indicate the necessity of choosing appropriate compressions for parameters individually -- and that FDTM can identify those -- while standard metrics result in deteriorated outcomes.

Related papers

• Sensitivity Meets Sparsity: The Impact of Extremely Sparse Parameter Patterns on Theory-of-Mind of Large Language Models [55.46269953415811]
  We identify ToM-sensitive parameters and show that perturbing as little as 0.001% of these parameters significantly degrades ToM performance. Our results have implications for enhancing model alignment, mitigating biases, and improving AI systems designed for human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T17:45:42Z)
• Optimizing Singular Spectrum for Large Language Model Compression [95.7621116637755]
  We introduce SoCo, a novel compression framework that learns to rescale the decomposed components of SVD in a data-driven manner. Thanks to the learnable singular spectrum, SoCo adaptively prunes components according to the sparsified importance scores. Experimental evaluations across multiple LLMs and benchmarks demonstrate that SoCo surpasses the state-of-the-art methods in model compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T23:18:39Z)
• Learn from Downstream and Be Yourself in Multimodal Large Language Model Fine-Tuning [104.27224674122313]
  Fine-tuning MLLM has become a common practice to improve performance on specific downstream tasks. To balance the trade-off between generalization and specialization, we propose measuring the parameter importance for both pre-trained and fine-tuning distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T01:16:37Z)
• MC-MoE: Mixture Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Gains More [71.0473038084673]
  We propose MC-MoE, a training-free Mixture-Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts large language models (MoE-LLMs) MC-MoE leverages the significance of both experts and tokens to achieve an extreme compression. For instance, at 2.54 bits, MC-MoE compresses 76.6% of the model, with only a 3.8% average accuracy loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T18:09:38Z)
• Evaluating the Impact of Compression Techniques on Task-Specific Performance of Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer powerful capabilities but incur substantial computational costs. This study evaluates the impact of popular compression methods on the LLaMA-2-7B model. We show that while SparseGPT and Wanda preserve perplexity even at 50% sparsity, they suffer significant degradation on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:34:11Z)
• MLAE: Masked LoRA Experts for Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning [45.93128932828256]
  Masked LoRA Experts (MLAE) is an innovative approach that applies the concept of masking to visual PEFT. Our method incorporates a cellular decomposition strategy that transforms a low-rank matrix into independent rank-1 submatrices. We show that MLAE achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance with an average accuracy score of 78.8% on the VTAB-1k benchmark and 90.9% on the FGVC benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T08:57:23Z)
• LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit [55.73370804397226]
  Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating large language models. We present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T11:49:05Z)
• Data-freeWeight Compress and Denoise for Large Language Models [101.53420111286952]
  We propose a novel approach termed Data-free Joint Rank-k Approximation for compressing the parameter matrices. We achieve a model pruning of 80% parameters while retaining 93.43% of the original performance without any calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:51:47Z)
• Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets [92.38654521870444]
  We introduce ACES, a contrastive challenge set spanning 146 language pairs. This dataset aims to discover whether metrics can identify 68 translation accuracy errors. We conduct a large-scale study by benchmarking ACES on 50 metrics submitted to the WMT 2022 and 2023 metrics shared tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T17:17:42Z)
• Evaluating natural language processing models with generalization metrics that do not need access to any training or testing data [66.11139091362078]
  We provide the first model selection results on large pretrained Transformers from Huggingface using generalization metrics. Despite their niche status, we find that metrics derived from the heavy-tail (HT) perspective are particularly useful in NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-06T20:07:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.