Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04287v1
• Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 19:00:56 GMT
• Title: Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Models
• Authors: Tony Lee, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chenlin Meng, Yifan Mai, Joon Sung Park, Agrim Gupta, Yunzhi Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Hannah Benita Teufel, Marco Bellagente, Minguk Kang, Taesung Park, Jure Leskovec, Jun-Yan Zhu, Li Fei-Fei, Jiajun Wu, Stefano Ermon, Percy Liang
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new benchmark, Holistic Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models (HEIM) We identify 12 aspects, including text-image alignment, image quality, aesthetics, originality, reasoning, knowledge, bias, toxicity, fairness, robustness, multilinguality, and efficiency. Our results reveal that no single model excels in all aspects, with different models demonstrating different strengths.
• Score: 153.47415461488097
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The stunning qualitative improvement of recent text-to-image models has led to their widespread attention and adoption. However, we lack a comprehensive quantitative understanding of their capabilities and risks. To fill this gap, we introduce a new benchmark, Holistic Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models (HEIM). Whereas previous evaluations focus mostly on text-image alignment and image quality, we identify 12 aspects, including text-image alignment, image quality, aesthetics, originality, reasoning, knowledge, bias, toxicity, fairness, robustness, multilinguality, and efficiency. We curate 62 scenarios encompassing these aspects and evaluate 26 state-of-the-art text-to-image models on this benchmark. Our results reveal that no single model excels in all aspects, with different models demonstrating different strengths. We release the generated images and human evaluation results for full transparency at https://crfm.stanford.edu/heim/v1.1.0 and the code at https://github.com/stanford-crfm/helm, which is integrated with the HELM codebase.

Related papers

• Image2Text2Image: A Novel Framework for Label-Free Evaluation of Image-to-Text Generation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [16.00576040281808]
  We propose a novel framework called Image2Text2Image to evaluate image captioning models. A high similarity score suggests that the model has produced a faithful textual description, while a low score highlights discrepancies. Our framework does not rely on human-annotated captions reference, making it a valuable tool for assessing image captioning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T17:07:01Z)
• TypeScore: A Text Fidelity Metric for Text-to-Image Generative Models [39.06617653124486]
  We introduce a new evaluation framework called TypeScore to assess a model's ability to generate images with high-fidelity embedded text. Our proposed metric demonstrates greater resolution than CLIPScore to differentiate popular image generation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T07:56:54Z)
• KITTEN: A Knowledge-Intensive Evaluation of Image Generation on Visual Entities [93.74881034001312]
  We conduct a systematic study on the fidelity of entities in text-to-image generation models. We focus on their ability to generate a wide range of real-world visual entities, such as landmark buildings, aircraft, plants, and animals. Our findings reveal that even the most advanced text-to-image models often fail to generate entities with accurate visual details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T17:50:37Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• FINEMATCH: Aspect-based Fine-grained Image and Text Mismatch Detection and Correction [66.98008357232428]
  We propose FineMatch, a new aspect-based fine-grained text and image matching benchmark. FineMatch focuses on text and image mismatch detection and correction. We show that models trained on FineMatch demonstrate enhanced proficiency in detecting fine-grained text and image mismatches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T03:42:14Z)
• Likelihood-Based Text-to-Image Evaluation with Patch-Level Perceptual and Semantic Credit Assignment [48.835298314274254]
  We propose to evaluate text-to-image generation performance by directly estimating the likelihood of the generated images. A higher likelihood indicates better perceptual quality and better text-image alignment. It can successfully assess the generation ability of these models with as few as a hundred samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T17:26:47Z)
• X-IQE: eXplainable Image Quality Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation with Visual Large Language Models [17.67105465600566]
  This paper introduces a novel explainable image quality evaluation approach called X-IQE. X-IQE uses visual large language models (LLMs) to evaluate text-to-image generation methods by generating textual explanations. It offers several advantages, including the ability to distinguish between real and generated images, evaluate text-image alignment, and assess image aesthetics without requiring model training or fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:56:44Z)
• RoCOCO: Robustness Benchmark of MS-COCO to Stress-test Image-Text Matching Models [36.19590638188108]
  We create new variants of texts and images in the MS-COCO test set and re-evaluate the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models with the new data. Specifically, we alter the meaning of text by replacing a word, and generate visually altered images that maintain some visual context. Our evaluations on the proposed benchmark reveal substantial performance degradation in many SOTA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T03:45:59Z)
• TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering [86.38098280689027]
  We introduce an automatic evaluation metric that measures the faithfulness of a generated image to its text input via visual question answering (VQA) We present a comprehensive evaluation of existing text-to-image models using a benchmark consisting of 4K diverse text inputs and 25K questions across 12 categories (object, counting, etc.)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:41:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.