Individual and gender inequality in computer science: A career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04559v1
• Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:42:09 GMT
• Title: Individual and gender inequality in computer science: A career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000
• Authors: Haiko Lietz, Mohsen Jadidi, Daniel Kostic, Milena Tsvetkova and Claudia Wagner
• Abstract summary: We study the evolution of individual and gender inequality for cohorts from 1970 to 2000 in the whole field of computer science. The Matthew Effect is shown to accumulate advantages to early achievements and to become stronger over the decades. Women continue to fall behind because they continue to be at a higher risk of dropping out for reasons that have nothing to do with early-career achievements or social support.
• Score: 0.817469727611392
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Inequality prevails in science. Individual inequality means that most perish quickly and only a few are successful, while gender inequality implies that there are differences in achievements for women and men. Using large-scale bibliographic data and following a computational approach, we study the evolution of individual and gender inequality for cohorts from 1970 to 2000 in the whole field of computer science as it grows and becomes a team-based science. We find that individual inequality in productivity (publications) increases over a scholar's career but is historically invariant, while individual inequality in impact (citations), albeit larger, is stable across cohorts and careers. Gender inequality prevails regarding productivity, but there is no evidence for differences in impact. The Matthew Effect is shown to accumulate advantages to early achievements and to become stronger over the decades, indicating the rise of a "publish or perish" imperative. Only some authors manage to reap the benefits that publishing in teams promises. The Matthew Effect then amplifies initial differences and propagates the gender gap. Women continue to fall behind because they continue to be at a higher risk of dropping out for reasons that have nothing to do with early-career achievements or social support. Our findings suggest that mentoring programs for women to improve their social-networking skills can help to reduce gender inequality.

Related papers

• Revealing and Reducing Gender Biases in Vision and Language Assistants (VLAs) [82.57490175399693]
  We study gender bias in 22 popular image-to-text vision-language assistants (VLAs) Our results show that VLAs replicate human biases likely present in the data, such as real-world occupational imbalances. To eliminate the gender bias in these models, we find that finetuning-based debiasing methods achieve the best tradeoff between debiasing and retaining performance on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T05:59:44Z)
• GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases. GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z)
• Perceptions of Entrepreneurship Among Graduate Students: Challenges, Opportunities, and Cultural Biases [0.0]
  The paper focuses on the perceptions of entrepreneurship of graduate students enrolled in a digital-oriented entrepreneurship course. The main issues raised by the students were internal traits and external obstacles, such as lack of resources and support. Gender discrimination and cultural biases persist, limiting opportunities and equality for women.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T08:35:18Z)
• Breaking Barriers: Investigating the Sense of Belonging Among Women and Non-Binary Students in Software Engineering [1.9075820340282934]
  Women are far less likely to pursue a career in the software engineering industry. Reasons for women and other underrepresented minorities to leave the industry are a lack of opportunities for growth and advancement. This research explores how the potential to cultivate or uphold an industry unfavourable to women and non-binary individuals in software engineering education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T20:07:45Z)
• What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learning [52.51430732904994]
  In reinforcement learning problems, agents must consider long-term fairness while maximizing returns. Recent works have proposed many different types of fairness notions, but how unfairness arises in RL problems remains unclear. We introduce a novel notion called dynamics fairness, which explicitly captures the inequality stemming from environmental dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T22:47:59Z)
• The Second Round: Diverse Paths Towards Software Engineering [1.6863735232819916]
  On average, women apply later to software engineering studies than men. Personal guidance in live events or platforms is most influential for women. Teachers and social media have a more significant impact on men.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T08:31:12Z)
• The Impact of Debiasing on the Performance of Language Models in Downstream Tasks is Underestimated [70.23064111640132]
  We compare the impact of debiasing on performance across multiple downstream tasks using a wide-range of benchmark datasets. Experiments show that the effects of debiasing are consistently emphunderestimated across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T20:25:34Z)
• The Resume Paradox: Greater Language Differences, Smaller Pay Gaps [0.0]
  We analyze the language in millions of US workers' resumes to investigate how differences in workers' self-representation by gender compare to differences in earnings. Across US occupations, language differences between male and female resumes correspond to 11% of the variation in gender pay gap. A doubling of the language difference between female and male resumes results in an annual wage increase of $2,797 for the average female worker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T15:49:35Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Are Commercial Face Detection Models as Biased as Academic Models? [64.71318433419636]
  We compare academic and commercial face detection systems, specifically examining robustness to noise. We find that state-of-the-art academic face detection models exhibit demographic disparities in their noise robustness. We conclude that commercial models are always as biased or more biased than an academic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T02:21:42Z)
• Implicit Gender Bias in Computer Science -- A Qualitative Study [3.158346511479111]
  Gender diversity in the tech sector is sufficient to create a balanced ratio of men and women. For many women, access to computer science is hampered by socialization-related, social, cultural and structural obstacles. The lack of contact in areas of computer science makes it difficult to develop or expand potential interests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-04T13:30:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.