Cognitively Inspired Components for Social Conversational Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05450v1
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:38:58 GMT
- Title: Cognitively Inspired Components for Social Conversational Agents
- Authors: Alex Clay, Eduardo Alonso, Esther Mondrag\'on
- Abstract summary: Two key categories of problem remain for conversational agents (CAs)
technical problems resulting from the approach taken in creating the CA, such as scope with retrieval agents and the often nonsensical answers of former generative agents.
Humans perceive CAs as social actors, and as a result expect the CA to adhere to social convention.
This paper presents a survey highlighting a potential solution to both categories of problem through the introduction of cognitively inspired additions to the CA.
- Score: 2.1408617023874443
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Current conversational agents (CA) have seen improvement in conversational
quality in recent years due to the influence of large language models (LLMs)
like GPT3. However, two key categories of problem remain. Firstly there are the
unique technical problems resulting from the approach taken in creating the CA,
such as scope with retrieval agents and the often nonsensical answers of former
generative agents. Secondly, humans perceive CAs as social actors, and as a
result expect the CA to adhere to social convention. Failure on the part of the
CA in this respect can lead to a poor interaction and even the perception of
threat by the user. As such, this paper presents a survey highlighting a
potential solution to both categories of problem through the introduction of
cognitively inspired additions to the CA. Through computational facsimiles of
semantic and episodic memory, emotion, working memory, and the ability to
learn, it is possible to address both the technical and social problems
encountered by CAs.
Related papers
- The Bots of Persuasion: Examining How Conversational Agents' Linguistic Expressions of Personality Affect User Perceptions and Decisions [14.362949339129637]
Large Language Model-powered conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly capable of projecting sophisticated personalities through language.<n>We examine how CA personalities expressed linguistically affect user decisions and perceptions in the context of charitable giving.<n>Our findings emphasize the risks CAs pose as instruments of manipulation, subtly influencing user perceptions and decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T09:10:41Z) - The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z) - "Even GPT Can Reject Me": Conceptualizing Abrupt Refusal Secondary Harm (ARSH) and Reimagining Psychological AI Safety with Compassionate Completion Standard (CCS) [10.377213441117618]
We argue that abrupt refusals can rupture perceived relational continuity, evoke feelings of rejection or shame, and discourage future help seeking.<n>We propose a design hypothesis, the Compassionate Completion Standard, that maintains safety constraints while preserving relational coherence.<n>This viewpoint contributes a timely conceptual framework, articulates a testable design hypothesis, and outlines a coordinated research agenda for improving psychological safety in human AI interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-21T15:31:15Z) - Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z) - Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion.
We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations.
Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z) - Toward Safe Evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) based Conversational Agents to Support Adolescent Mental and Sexual Health Knowledge Discovery [0.22530496464901104]
We discuss the current landscape and opportunities for Conversation Agents (CAs) to support adolescents' mental and sexual health knowledge discovery.
We call for a discourse on how to set guardrails for the safe evolution of AI-based CAs for adolescents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T19:18:25Z) - Understanding Public Perceptions of AI Conversational Agents: A
Cross-Cultural Analysis [22.93365830074122]
Conversational Agents (CAs) have increasingly been integrated into everyday life, sparking significant discussions on social media.
This study used computational methods to analyze about one million social media discussions surrounding CAs.
We find Chinese participants tended to view CAs hedonically, perceived voice-based and physically embodied CAs as warmer and more competent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T09:34:22Z) - Sim-to-Real Causal Transfer: A Metric Learning Approach to
Causally-Aware Interaction Representations [62.48505112245388]
We take an in-depth look at the causal awareness of modern representations of agent interactions.
We show that recent representations are already partially resilient to perturbations of non-causal agents.
We propose a metric learning approach that regularizes latent representations with causal annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T18:57:03Z) - Neural-Logic Human-Object Interaction Detection [67.4993347702353]
We present L OGIC HOI, a new HOI detector that leverages neural-logic reasoning and Transformer to infer feasible interactions between entities.
Specifically, we modify the self-attention mechanism in vanilla Transformer, enabling it to reason over the human, action, object> triplet and constitute novel interactions.
We formulate these two properties in first-order logic and ground them into continuous space to constrain the learning process of our approach, leading to improved performance and zero-shot generalization capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T11:47:53Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - From human-centered to social-centered artificial intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT's impact through disruptive events [1.1858896428516252]
We argue that critiques of ChatGPT's impact in machine learning research communities have coalesced around its performance or other conventional safety evaluations relating to bias, toxicity, and "hallucination"
By analyzing ChatGPT's social impact through a social-centered framework, we challenge individualistic approaches in AI development and contribute to ongoing debates around the ethical and responsible deployment of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T22:46:48Z) - TalkTive: A Conversational Agent Using Backchannels to Engage Older
Adults in Neurocognitive Disorders Screening [51.97352212369947]
We analyzed 246 conversations of cognitive assessments between older adults and human assessors.
We derived the categories of reactive backchannels and proactive backchannels.
This is used in the development of TalkTive, a CA which can predict both timing and form of backchanneling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-16T17:55:34Z) - Adversarial Attacks in Cooperative AI [0.0]
Single-agent reinforcement learning algorithms in a multi-agent environment are inadequate for fostering cooperation.
Recent work in adversarial machine learning shows that models can be easily deceived into making incorrect decisions.
Cooperative AI might introduce new weaknesses not investigated in previous machine learning research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T07:34:12Z) - Can You be More Social? Injecting Politeness and Positivity into
Task-Oriented Conversational Agents [60.27066549589362]
Social language used by human agents is associated with greater users' responsiveness and task completion.
The model uses a sequence-to-sequence deep learning architecture, extended with a social language understanding element.
Evaluation in terms of content preservation and social language level using both human judgment and automatic linguistic measures shows that the model can generate responses that enable agents to address users' issues in a more socially appropriate way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T08:22:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.