Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07989v7
• Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:11:00 GMT
• Title: Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Code
• Authors: Ziyin Zhang, Chaoyu Chen, Bingchang Liu, Cong Liao, Zi Gong, Hang Yu, Jianguo Li, Rui Wang,
• Abstract summary: We review the recent advancements in software engineering with language models, covering 70+ models, 40+ evaluation tasks, 180+ datasets, and 900 related works. We break down code processing models into general language models represented by the GPT family and specialized models that are specifically pretrained on code. We also go beyond programming and review LLMs' application in other software engineering activities including requirement engineering, testing, deployment, and operations.
• Score: 24.936022005837415
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work we systematically review the recent advancements in software engineering with language models, covering 70+ models, 40+ evaluation tasks, 180+ datasets, and 900 related works. Unlike previous works, we integrate software engineering (SE) with natural language processing (NLP) by discussing the perspectives of both sides: SE applies language models for development automation, while NLP adopts SE tasks for language model evaluation. We break down code processing models into general language models represented by the GPT family and specialized models that are specifically pretrained on code, often with tailored objectives. We discuss the relations and differences between these models, and highlight the historical transition of code modeling from statistical models and RNNs to pretrained Transformers and LLMs, which is exactly the same course that had been taken by NLP. We also go beyond programming and review LLMs' application in other software engineering activities including requirement engineering, testing, deployment, and operations in an endeavor to provide a global view of NLP in SE, and identify key challenges and potential future directions in this domain. We keep the survey open and updated on GitHub at https://github.com/codefuse-ai/Awesome-Code-LLM.

Related papers

• In-Context Code-Text Learning for Bimodal Software Engineering [26.0027882745058]
  Bimodal software analysis initially appeared to be within reach with the advent of large language models. We postulate that in-context learning for the code-text bimodality is a promising avenue. We consider a diverse dataset encompassing 23 software engineering tasks, which we transform in an in-context learning format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T19:42:00Z)
• CodeGRAG: Bridging the Gap between Natural Language and Programming Language via Graphical Retrieval Augmented Generation [58.84212778960507]
  We propose CodeGRAG, a Graphical Retrieval Augmented Code Generation framework to enhance the performance of LLMs. CodeGRAG builds the graphical view of code blocks based on the control flow and data flow of them to fill the gap between programming languages and natural language. Various experiments and ablations are done on four datasets including both the C++ and python languages to validate the hard meta-graph prompt, the soft prompting technique, and the effectiveness of the objectives for pretrained GNN expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T02:48:55Z)
• CMULAB: An Open-Source Framework for Training and Deployment of Natural Language Processing Models [59.91221728187576]
  This paper introduces the CMU Linguistic Linguistic Backend, an open-source framework that simplifies model deployment and continuous human-in-the-loop fine-tuning of NLP models. CMULAB enables users to leverage the power of multilingual models to quickly adapt and extend existing tools for speech recognition, OCR, translation, and syntactic analysis to new languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T02:21:46Z)
• Generative AI for Software Metadata: Overview of the Information Retrieval in Software Engineering Track at FIRE 2023 [18.616716369775883]
  The Information Retrieval in Software Engineering (IRSE) track aims to develop solutions for automated evaluation of code comments. The dataset consists of 9048 code comments and surrounding code snippet pairs extracted from open source C based projects. The labels generated from large language models increase the bias in the prediction model but lead to less over-fitted results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T14:13:23Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• Enhancing Automated Program Repair through Fine-tuning and Prompt Engineering [2.3826139428423576]
  Sequence-to-sequence models have been used to transform erroneous programs into correct ones when trained with a large enough dataset. Some recent studies demonstrated strong empirical evidence that code review could improve the program repair further. We investigate if this inherent knowledge of PL and NL can be utilized to improve automated program repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T17:29:51Z)
• An Overview on Language Models: Recent Developments and Outlook [32.528770408502396]
  Conventional language models (CLMs) aim to predict the probability of linguistic sequences in a causal manner. Pre-trained language models (PLMs) cover broader concepts and can be used in both causal sequential modeling and fine-tuning for downstream applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T07:55:00Z)
• Summarize and Generate to Back-translate: Unsupervised Translation of Programming Languages [86.08359401867577]
  Back-translation is widely known for its effectiveness for neural machine translation when little to no parallel data is available. We propose performing back-translation via code summarization and generation. We show that our proposed approach performs competitively with state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:20:41Z)
• A Conversational Paradigm for Program Synthesis [110.94409515865867]
  We propose a conversational program synthesis approach via large language models. We train a family of large language models, called CodeGen, on natural language and programming language data. Our findings show the emergence of conversational capabilities and the effectiveness of the proposed conversational program synthesis paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T06:55:15Z)
• Automated Source Code Generation and Auto-completion Using Deep Learning: Comparing and Discussing Current Language-Model-Related Approaches [0.0]
  This paper compares different deep learning architectures to create and use language models based on programming code. We discuss each approach's different strengths and weaknesses and what gaps we find to evaluate the language models or apply them in a real programming context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T15:17:04Z)
• Exploring Software Naturalness through Neural Language Models [56.1315223210742]
  The Software Naturalness hypothesis argues that programming languages can be understood through the same techniques used in natural language processing. We explore this hypothesis through the use of a pre-trained transformer-based language model to perform code analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:56:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.