Low-Rank Adaptation for Multilingual Summarization: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08572v2
• Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:01:34 GMT
• Title: Low-Rank Adaptation for Multilingual Summarization: An Empirical Study
• Authors: Chenxi Whitehouse, Fantine Huot, Jasmijn Bastings, Mostafa Dehghani, Chu-Cheng Lin, Mirella Lapata,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the potential of. Efficient Fine-Tuning, focusing on Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) in the domain of multilingual summarization. We conduct an extensive study across different data availability scenarios, including high- and low-data settings, and cross-lingual transfer. Our findings reveal that LoRA is competitive with full fine-tuning when trained with high quantities of data, and excels in low-data scenarios and cross-lingual transfer.
• Score: 60.541168233698194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although the advancements of pre-trained Large Language Models have significantly accelerated recent progress in NLP, their ever-increasing size poses significant challenges for conventional fine-tuning, especially in memory-intensive tasks. We investigate the potential of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning, focusing on Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), in the domain of multilingual summarization, a task that is both challenging (due to typically long inputs), and relatively unexplored. We conduct an extensive study across different data availability scenarios, including high- and low-data settings, and cross-lingual transfer, leveraging models of different sizes. Our findings reveal that LoRA is competitive with full fine-tuning when trained with high quantities of data, and excels in low-data scenarios and cross-lingual transfer. We also study different strategies for few-shot cross-lingual transfer, finding that continued LoRA tuning outperforms full fine-tuning and the dynamic composition of language-specific LoRA modules.

Related papers

• MTL-LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Multi-Task Learning [74.43869839954168]
  We propose MTL-LoRA, which retains the advantages of low-rank adaptation while significantly enhancing multi-task learning capabilities. MTL-LoRA augments LoRA by incorporating additional task-adaptive parameters that differentiate task-specific information. This approach enables large language models (LLMs) pre-trained on general corpus to adapt to different target task domains with a limited number of trainable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T08:32:26Z)
• Quality or Quantity? On Data Scale and Diversity in Adapting Large Language Models for Low-Resource Translation [62.202893186343935]
  We explore what it would take to adapt Large Language Models for low-resource languages. We show that parallel data is critical during both pre-training andSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) Our experiments with three LLMs across two low-resourced language groups reveal consistent trends, underscoring the generalizability of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T00:59:38Z)
• Large Language Models as Foundations for Next-Gen Dense Retrieval: A Comprehensive Empirical Assessment [16.39696580487218]
  Pretrained language models like BERT and T5 serve as crucial backbone encoders for dense retrieval. Recent research has explored using large language models (LLMs) as retrievers, achieving SOTA performance across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T08:16:07Z)
• Low-Rank Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models [13.803180972839213]
  We introduce Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) in few-shot learning for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) Surprisingly, our simple CLIP-LoRA method exhibits substantial improvements, while reducing the training times. Our results do not dismiss the potential of prompt-learning and adapter-based research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T19:16:59Z)
• Scalable Language Model with Generalized Continual Learning [58.700439919096155]
  The Joint Adaptive Re-ization (JARe) is integrated with Dynamic Task-related Knowledge Retrieval (DTKR) to enable adaptive adjustment of language models based on specific downstream tasks. Our method demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on diverse backbones and benchmarks, achieving effective continual learning in both full-set and few-shot scenarios with minimal forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T04:22:15Z)
• Analyzing the Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual Language Models [12.662039551306632]
  We show that observed high performance of multilingual models can be largely attributed to factors not requiring the transfer of actual linguistic knowledge. More specifically, we observe what has been transferred across languages is mostly data artifacts and biases, especially for low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T09:41:52Z)
• Teaching Smaller Language Models To Generalise To Unseen Compositional Questions [6.9076450524134145]
  We propose a combination of multitask pretraining on up to 93 tasks designed to instill diverse reasoning abilities. We show that performance can be significantly improved by adding retrieval-augmented training datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T05:00:12Z)
• IGLUE: A Benchmark for Transfer Learning across Modalities, Tasks, and Languages [87.5457337866383]
  We introduce the Image-Grounded Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark. IGLUE brings together visual question answering, cross-modal retrieval, grounded reasoning, and grounded entailment tasks across 20 diverse languages. We find that translate-test transfer is superior to zero-shot transfer and that few-shot learning is hard to harness for many tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T18:53:22Z)
• Improving Classifier Training Efficiency for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection with Feature Density [58.64907136562178]
  We study the effectiveness of Feature Density (FD) using different linguistically-backed feature preprocessing methods. We hypothesise that estimating dataset complexity allows for the reduction of the number of required experiments. The difference in linguistic complexity of datasets allows us to additionally discuss the efficacy of linguistically-backed word preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:48:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.