GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09606v2
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:15:55 GMT
• Title: GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks
• Authors: Shivanshu Gupta, Clemens Rosenbaum, Ethan R. Elenberg
• Abstract summary: In-context Learning (ICL) is the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform new tasks when conditioned on prompts. We propose Example Gisting, a novel approach for training example encoders through supervised fine-tuning. We show that our fine-tuned models get state-of-the-art ICL performance with over 20% absolute gain over off-the-shelf retrievers.
• Score: 3.9638110494107095
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In-context Learning (ICL) is the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform new tasks when conditioned on prompts comprising a few task examples. However, ICL performance can be critically sensitive to the choice of examples. To dynamically select the best examples for every test input, we propose Example Gisting, a novel approach for training example encoders through supervised fine-tuning with an attention bottleneck between the inputs and outputs. These gist models form the basis for GistScore, a novel metric for scoring and selecting informative examples. Further, we experiment with two variations: (1) fine-tuning gist models for each dataset and (2) multi-task training a single model on a large collection of datasets. The latter can be used for new tasks out-of-the-box, enabling a training-free ICL pipeline. Evaluations with 21 datasets spanning 9 tasks and 8 diverse LLMs show that our fine-tuned models get state-of-the-art ICL performance with over 20% absolute gain over off-the-shelf retrievers and 5% over the best prior methods. Further, our multi-task model generalizes well to new tasks, datasets, and prompt templates. Selection using this model matches or outperforms prior methods while being three orders of magnitude faster than the strongest training-free baseline.

Related papers

• Dynamic Data Mixing Maximizes Instruction Tuning for Mixture-of-Experts [20.202031878825153]
  We propose a novel dynamic data mixture for MoE instruction tuning. Inspired by MoE's token routing preference, we build dataset-level representations and then capture the subtle differences among datasets. Results on two MoE models demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on both downstream knowledge & reasoning tasks and open-ended queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:47:03Z)
• Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selection [59.11430077029321]
  We introduce a novel dataset selection method, Self-Filter, for vision-language models (VLMs) In the first stage, we devise a scoring network to evaluate the difficulty of training instructions, which is co-trained with the VLM. In the second stage, we use the trained score net to measure the difficulty of each instruction, select the most challenging samples, and penalize similar samples to encourage diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T20:08:48Z)
• DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels [81.01744199870043]
  Standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. We find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. Our framework avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T17:22:00Z)
• Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning [47.02160072880698]
  We introduce a self-evolving mechanism that allows the model itself to actively sample subsets that are equally or even more effective. The key to our data sampling technique lies in the enhancement of diversity in the chosen subsets. Extensive experiments across three datasets and benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DiverseEvol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T14:10:40Z)
• RetICL: Sequential Retrieval of In-Context Examples with Reinforcement Learning [53.52699766206808]
  We propose Retrieval for In-Context Learning (RetICL), a learnable method for modeling and optimally selecting examples sequentially for in-context learning. We evaluate RetICL on math word problem solving and scientific question answering tasks and show that it consistently outperforms or matches and learnable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T20:15:56Z)
• RPLKG: Robust Prompt Learning with Knowledge Graph [11.893917358053004]
  We propose a new method, robust prompt learning with knowledge graph (RPLKG) Based on the knowledge graph, we automatically design diverse interpretable and meaningful prompt sets. RPLKG shows a significant performance improvement compared to zero-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T08:22:58Z)
• MILO: Model-Agnostic Subset Selection Framework for Efficient Model Training and Tuning [68.12870241637636]
  We propose MILO, a model-agnostic subset selection framework that decouples the subset selection from model training. Our empirical results indicate that MILO can train models $3times - 10 times$ faster and tune hyperparameters $20times - 75 times$ faster than full-dataset training or tuning without performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T20:59:30Z)
• Data Curation Alone Can Stabilize In-context Learning [20.874674130060388]
  In-context learning (ICL) enables large language models to perform new tasks by prompting them with a sequence of training examples. randomly sampling examples from a training set leads to high variance in performance. We show that carefully curating a subset of training data greatly stabilizes ICL performance without any other changes to the ICL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T15:58:54Z)
• A Lagrangian Duality Approach to Active Learning [119.36233726867992]
  We consider the batch active learning problem, where only a subset of the training data is labeled. We formulate the learning problem using constrained optimization, where each constraint bounds the performance of the model on labeled samples. We show, via numerical experiments, that our proposed approach performs similarly to or better than state-of-the-art active learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T19:18:49Z)
• Lifelong Learning Without a Task Oracle [13.331659934508764]
  Supervised deep neural networks are known to undergo a sharp decline in the accuracy of older tasks when new tasks are learned. We propose and compare several candidate task-assigning mappers which require very little memory overhead. Best-performing variants only impose an average cost of 1.7% parameter memory increase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:30:31Z)
• The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Object Detection and Instance Segmentation [93.17367076148348]
  We investigate performance drop of the state-of-the-art two-stage instance segmentation model Mask R-CNN on the recent long-tail LVIS dataset. We unveil that a major cause is the inaccurate classification of object proposals. We propose a simple calibration framework to more effectively alleviate classification head bias with a bi-level class balanced sampling approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T12:49:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.