An Empirical Bayes Framework for Open-Domain Dialogue Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10945v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 02:48:41 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Bayes Framework for Open-Domain Dialogue Generation
• Authors: Jing Yang Lee, Kong Aik Lee, and Woon-Seng Gan
• Abstract summary: We propose an empirical bayes framework for constructing an open-domain dialogue agent by leveraging pretrained parameters. Empirical results show that BODEB achieves better results in terms of both diversity and coherence compared to variational frameworks.
• Score: 27.83533924583182
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To engage human users in meaningful conversation, open-domain dialogue agents are required to generate diverse and contextually coherent dialogue. Despite recent advancements, which can be attributed to the usage of pretrained language models, the generation of diverse and coherent dialogue remains an open research problem. A popular approach to address this issue involves the adaptation of variational frameworks. However, while these approaches successfully improve diversity, they tend to compromise on contextual coherence. Hence, we propose the Bayesian Open-domain Dialogue with Empirical Bayes (BODEB) framework, an empirical bayes framework for constructing an Bayesian open-domain dialogue agent by leveraging pretrained parameters to inform the prior and posterior parameter distributions. Empirical results show that BODEB achieves better results in terms of both diversity and coherence compared to variational frameworks.

Related papers

• 'No' Matters: Out-of-Distribution Detection in Multimodality Long Dialogue [3.971267935825097]
  This paper aims to improve the user experience that involves multi-round long dialogues by efficiently detecting OOD dialogues and images. We introduce a novel scoring framework named Dialogue Image Aligning and Enhancing Framework (DIAEF) that integrates the visual language models with the novel proposed scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:45:54Z)
• Leveraging Explicit Reasoning for Inference Integration in Commonsense-Augmented Dialogue Models [12.116834890063146]
  Open-domain dialogue systems need to grasp social commonsense to understand and respond effectively to human users. Existing approaches to commonsense-augmented dialogue rely on implicit reasoning to integrate commonsense inferences during response generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:07:52Z)
• EM Pre-training for Multi-party Dialogue Response Generation [86.25289241604199]
  In multi-party dialogues, the addressee of a response utterance should be specified before it is generated. We propose an Expectation-Maximization (EM) approach that iteratively performs the expectation steps to generate addressee labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T09:22:41Z)
• DialAug: Mixing up Dialogue Contexts in Contrastive Learning for Robust Conversational Modeling [3.3578533367912025]
  We propose a framework that incorporates augmented versions of a dialogue context into the learning objective. We show that our proposed augmentation method outperforms previous data augmentation approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T23:39:41Z)
• Towards Identifying Social Bias in Dialog Systems: Frame, Datasets, and Benchmarks [95.29345070102045]
  In this paper, we focus our investigation on social bias detection of dialog safety problems. We first propose a novel Dial-Bias Frame for analyzing the social bias in conversations pragmatically. We introduce CDail-Bias dataset that is the first well-annotated Chinese social bias dialog dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T11:59:29Z)
• Is this Dialogue Coherent? Learning from Dialogue Acts and Entities [82.44143808977209]
  We create the Switchboard Coherence (SWBD-Coh) corpus, a dataset of human-human spoken dialogues annotated with turn coherence ratings. Our statistical analysis of the corpus indicates how turn coherence perception is affected by patterns of distribution of entities. We find that models combining both DA and entity information yield the best performances both for response selection and turn coherence rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T21:02:40Z)
• Rethinking Dialogue State Tracking with Reasoning [76.0991910623001]
  This paper proposes to track dialogue states gradually with reasoning over dialogue turns with the help of the back-end data. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by 38.6% in terms of joint belief accuracy for MultiWOZ 2.1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T02:05:33Z)
• Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [53.2896545819799]
  We present the first human-annotated dialogue-based relation extraction (RE) dataset DialogRE. We argue that speaker-related information plays a critical role in the proposed task, based on an analysis of similarities and differences between dialogue-based and traditional RE tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that a speaker-aware extension on the best-performing model leads to gains in both the standard and conversational evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T03:51:57Z)
• Variational Hierarchical Dialog Autoencoder for Dialog State Tracking Data Augmentation [59.174903564894954]
  In this work, we extend this approach to the task of dialog state tracking for goal-oriented dialogs. We propose the Variational Hierarchical Dialog Autoencoder (VHDA) for modeling the complete aspects of goal-oriented dialogs. Experiments on various dialog datasets show that our model improves the downstream dialog trackers' robustness via generative data augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-23T15:34:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.