Adversarial Reweighting Guided by Wasserstein Distance for Bias Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12684v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:46:11 GMT
• Title: Adversarial Reweighting Guided by Wasserstein Distance for Bias Mitigation
• Authors: Xuan Zhao and Simone Fabbrizzi and Paula Reyero Lobo and Siamak Ghodsi and Klaus Broelemann and Steffen Staab and Gjergji Kasneci
• Abstract summary: Under-representation of minorities in the data makes the disparate treatment of subpopulations difficult to deal with during learning. We propose a novel adversarial reweighting method to address such emphrepresentation bias.
• Score: 24.160692009892088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The unequal representation of different groups in a sample population can lead to discrimination of minority groups when machine learning models make automated decisions. To address these issues, fairness-aware machine learning jointly optimizes two (or more) metrics aiming at predictive effectiveness and low unfairness. However, the inherent under-representation of minorities in the data makes the disparate treatment of subpopulations less noticeable and difficult to deal with during learning. In this paper, we propose a novel adversarial reweighting method to address such \emph{representation bias}. To balance the data distribution between the majority and the minority groups, our approach deemphasizes samples from the majority group. To minimize empirical risk, our method prefers samples from the majority group that are close to the minority group as evaluated by the Wasserstein distance. Our theoretical analysis shows the effectiveness of our adversarial reweighting approach. Experiments demonstrate that our approach mitigates bias without sacrificing classification accuracy, outperforming related state-of-the-art methods on image and tabular benchmark datasets.

Related papers

• Confronting Discrimination in Classification: Smote Based on Marginalized Minorities in the Kernel Space for Imbalanced Data [0.0]
  We propose a novel classification oversampling approach based on the decision boundary and sample proximity relationships. We test the proposed method on a classic financial fraud dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T04:03:09Z)
• Bias Amplification Enhances Minority Group Performance [10.380812738348899]
  We propose BAM, a novel two-stage training algorithm. In the first stage, the model is trained using a bias amplification scheme via introducing a learnable auxiliary variable for each training sample. In the second stage, we upweight the samples that the bias-amplified model misclassifies, and then continue training the same model on the reweighted dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T04:40:08Z)
• Tackling Diverse Minorities in Imbalanced Classification [80.78227787608714]
  Imbalanced datasets are commonly observed in various real-world applications, presenting significant challenges in training classifiers. We propose generating synthetic samples iteratively by mixing data samples from both minority and majority classes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through extensive experiments conducted on seven publicly available benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:48:34Z)
• Few-shot Forgery Detection via Guided Adversarial Interpolation [56.59499187594308]
  Existing forgery detection methods suffer from significant performance drops when applied to unseen novel forgery approaches. We propose Guided Adversarial Interpolation (GAI) to overcome the few-shot forgery detection problem. Our method is validated to be robust to choices of majority and minority forgery approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T16:05:10Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributes [85.5691102676175]
  We propose a simple but effective debiasing technique in an unsupervised manner. We perform clustering on the feature embedding space and identify pseudoattributes by taking advantage of the clustering results. We then employ a novel cluster-based reweighting scheme for learning debiased representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T05:20:46Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)
• Counterfactual-based minority oversampling for imbalanced classification [11.140929092818235]
  A key challenge of oversampling in imbalanced classification is that the generation of new minority samples often neglects the usage of majority classes. We present a new oversampling framework based on the counterfactual theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T14:13:15Z)
• An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlations [98.3066727301239]
  We identify two key properties of the training data that drive this behavior. We show how the inductive bias of models towards "memorizing" fewer examples can cause over parameterization to hurt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:59:13Z)
• M2m: Imbalanced Classification via Major-to-minor Translation [79.09018382489506]
  In most real-world scenarios, labeled training datasets are highly class-imbalanced, where deep neural networks suffer from generalizing to a balanced testing criterion. In this paper, we explore a novel yet simple way to alleviate this issue by augmenting less-frequent classes via translating samples from more-frequent classes. Our experimental results on a variety of class-imbalanced datasets show that the proposed method improves the generalization on minority classes significantly compared to other existing re-sampling or re-weighting methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T13:21:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.