Leveraging Diffusion Perturbations for Measuring Fairness in Computer Vision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15108v2
• Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 06:07:19 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Diffusion Perturbations for Measuring Fairness in Computer Vision
• Authors: Nicholas Lui, Bryan Chia, William Berrios, Candace Ross, Douwe Kiela
• Abstract summary: We demonstrate that diffusion models can be leveraged to create such a dataset. We benchmark several vision-language models on a multi-class occupation classification task. We find that images generated with non-Caucasian labels have a significantly higher occupation misclassification rate than images generated with Caucasian labels.
• Score: 25.414154497482162
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Computer vision models have been known to encode harmful biases, leading to the potentially unfair treatment of historically marginalized groups, such as people of color. However, there remains a lack of datasets balanced along demographic traits that can be used to evaluate the downstream fairness of these models. In this work, we demonstrate that diffusion models can be leveraged to create such a dataset. We first use a diffusion model to generate a large set of images depicting various occupations. Subsequently, each image is edited using inpainting to generate multiple variants, where each variant refers to a different perceived race. Using this dataset, we benchmark several vision-language models on a multi-class occupation classification task. We find that images generated with non-Caucasian labels have a significantly higher occupation misclassification rate than images generated with Caucasian labels, and that several misclassifications are suggestive of racial biases. We measure a model's downstream fairness by computing the standard deviation in the probability of predicting the true occupation label across the different perceived identity groups. Using this fairness metric, we find significant disparities between the evaluated vision-and-language models. We hope that our work demonstrates the potential value of diffusion methods for fairness evaluations.

Related papers

• Dataset Scale and Societal Consistency Mediate Facial Impression Bias in Vision-Language AI [17.101569078791492]
  We study 43 CLIP vision-language models to determine whether they learn human-like facial impression biases. We show for the first time that the the degree to which a bias is shared across a society predicts the degree to which it is reflected in a CLIP model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T08:26:58Z)
• Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness [100.36114135663836]
  We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets. Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize. Data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T07:54:50Z)
• Improving Fairness using Vision-Language Driven Image Augmentation [60.428157003498995]
  Fairness is crucial when training a deep-learning discriminative model, especially in the facial domain. Models tend to correlate specific characteristics (such as age and skin color) with unrelated attributes (downstream tasks) This paper proposes a method to mitigate these correlations to improve fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T19:51:10Z)
• Evaluating the Fairness of Discriminative Foundation Models in Computer Vision [51.176061115977774]
  We propose a novel taxonomy for bias evaluation of discriminative foundation models, such as Contrastive Language-Pretraining (CLIP) We then systematically evaluate existing methods for mitigating bias in these models with respect to our taxonomy. Specifically, we evaluate OpenAI's CLIP and OpenCLIP models for key applications, such as zero-shot classification, image retrieval and image captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T10:32:39Z)
• FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark [21.862644380063756]
  Computer vision models have known performance disparities across attributes such as gender and skin tone. We present a new benchmark named FACET (FAirness in Computer Vision EvaluaTion) FACET is a large, publicly available evaluation set of 32k images for some of the most common vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:59:48Z)
• Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier [90.40799216880342]
  We show that density estimates from large-scale text-to-image diffusion models can be leveraged to perform zero-shot classification. Our generative approach to classification attains strong results on a variety of benchmarks. Our results are a step toward using generative over discriminative models for downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:59:56Z)
• DeAR: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Additive Residuals [5.672132510411465]
  Large pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) provide rich, adaptable image and text representations. These models suffer from societal biases owing to the skewed distribution of various identity groups in the training data. We present DeAR, a novel debiasing method that learns additive residual image representations to offset the original representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T14:57:43Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• Fair Group-Shared Representations with Normalizing Flows [68.29997072804537]
  We develop a fair representation learning algorithm which is able to map individuals belonging to different groups in a single group. We show experimentally that our methodology is competitive with other fair representation learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T10:49:49Z)
• Understanding Gender and Racial Disparities in Image Recognition Models [0.0]
  We investigate a multi-label softmax loss with cross-entropy as the loss function instead of a binary cross-entropy on a multi-label classification problem. We use the MR2 dataset to evaluate the fairness in the model outcomes and try to interpret the mistakes by looking at model activations and suggest possible fixes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T01:05:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.