A Study of Partisan News Sharing in the Russian invasion of Ukraine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15294v1
• Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 13:25:11 GMT
• Title: A Study of Partisan News Sharing in the Russian invasion of Ukraine
• Authors: Yiming Zhu, Ehsan-Ul Haq, Gareth Tyson, Lik-Hang Lee, Yuyang Wang, Pan Hui
• Abstract summary: Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a large volume of biased and partisan news has been spread via social media platforms. We aim to characterize the role of such sharing in influencing users' communications. We build a predictive model to identify users likely to spread partisan news.
• Score: 31.211851388657152
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a large volume of biased and partisan news has been spread via social media platforms. As this may lead to wider societal issues, we argue that understanding how partisan news sharing impacts users' communication is crucial for better governance of online communities. In this paper, we perform a measurement study of partisan news sharing. We aim to characterize the role of such sharing in influencing users' communications. Our analysis covers an eight-month dataset across six Reddit communities related to the Russian invasion. We first perform an analysis of the temporal evolution of partisan news sharing. We confirm that the invasion stimulates discussion in the observed communities, accompanied by an increased volume of partisan news sharing. Next, we characterize users' response to such sharing. We observe that partisan bias plays a role in narrowing its propagation. More biased media is less likely to be spread across multiple subreddits. However, we find that partisan news sharing attracts more users to engage in the discussion, by generating more comments. We then built a predictive model to identify users likely to spread partisan news. The prediction is challenging though, with 61.57% accuracy on average. Our centrality analysis on the commenting network further indicates that the users who disseminate partisan news possess lower network influence in comparison to those who propagate neutral news.

Related papers

• The Shapes of the Fourth Estate During the Pandemic: Profiling COVID-19 News Consumption in Eight Countries [11.9136268069059]
  We measure the average but also the distribution of audience political leanings for different media across different countries. We focus on geolocated users from eight countries, profile user leaning distribution for each country, and analyze bridging users who have interactions across multiple countries. This study contributes a new set of media bias estimates by averaging the leaning scores of users who share the URLs from media domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T22:00:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Political Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities [7.892285386961407]
  We conduct the largest study of news sharing on reddit to date, analyzing more than 550 million links spanning 4 years. We find that, compared to left-leaning communities, right-leaning communities have 105% more variance in the political bias of their news sources. We show that extremely biased and low factual content is very concentrated, with 99% of such content being shared in only 0.5% of communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T02:35:13Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.