Real Customization or Just Marketing: Are Customized Versions of Chat GPT Useful?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03728v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:46:15 GMT
• Title: Real Customization or Just Marketing: Are Customized Versions of Chat GPT Useful?
• Authors: Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch\'an, Jose L. Arroyo-Barrig\"uete, Francisco Borr\'as-Pala, Leandro Escobar-Torres, Carlos Mart\'inez de Ibarreta, Jose Mar\'ia Ortiz-Lozano, and Antonio Rua-Vieites
• Abstract summary: OpenAI has launched the possibility to fine-tune their model with a natural language web interface. This research is to assess the potential of the customized GPTs that have recently been launched by OpenAI.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), as the case of OpenAI ChatGPT-4 Turbo, are revolutionizing several industries, including higher education. In this context, LLMs can be personalized through a fine-tuning process to meet the student demands on every particular subject, like statistics. Recently, OpenAI has launched the possibility to fine-tune their model with a natural language web interface, enabling the possibility to create customized GPT version deliberately conditioned to meet the demands of a specific task. The objective of this research is to assess the potential of the customized GPTs that have recently been launched by OpenAI. After developing a Business Statistics Virtual Professor (BSVP), tailored for students at the Universidad Pontificia Comillas, its behavior was evaluated and compared with that of ChatGPT-4 Turbo. The results lead to several conclusions. Firstly, a substantial modification in the style of communication was observed. Following the instructions it was trained with, BSVP provided responses in a more relatable and friendly tone, even incorporating a few minor jokes. Secondly, and this is a matter of relevance, when explicitly asked for something like, "I would like to practice a programming exercise similar to those in R practice 4," BSVP was capable of providing a far superior response: having access to contextual documentation, it could fulfill the request, something beyond ChatGPT-4 Turbo's capabilities. On the downside, the response times were generally higher. Lastly, regarding overall performance, quality, depth, and alignment with the specific content of the course, no statistically significant differences were observed in the responses between BSVP and ChatGPT-4 Turbo. It appears that customized assistants trained with prompts present advantages as virtual aids for students, yet they do not constitute a substantial improvement over ChatGPT-4 Turbo.

Related papers

• Feedback-Generation for Programming Exercises With GPT-4 [0.0]
  This paper explores the quality of GPT-4 Turbo's generated output for prompts containing both the programming task specification and a student's submission as input. The output was qualitatively analyzed regarding correctness, personalization, fault localization, and other features identified in the material.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T12:37:52Z)
• GPT4Vis: What Can GPT-4 Do for Zero-shot Visual Recognition? [82.40761196684524]
  This paper centers on the evaluation of GPT-4's linguistic and visual capabilities in zero-shot visual recognition tasks. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate GPT-4's performance across images, videos, and point clouds. Our findings show that GPT-4, enhanced with rich linguistic descriptions, significantly improves zero-shot recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T11:29:10Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of Prompt-Tuning in Bridging Generalized and Personalized Federated Learning [49.72857433721424]
  Vision Transformers (ViT) and Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) achieve state-of-the-art performance with improved efficiency in various computer vision tasks. We present a novel algorithm, SGPT, that integrates Generalized FL (GFL) and Personalized FL (PFL) approaches by employing a unique combination of both shared and group-specific prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T17:22:09Z)
• Prompt Engineering or Fine Tuning: An Empirical Assessment of Large Language Models in Automated Software Engineering Tasks [8.223311621898983]
  GPT-4 with conversational prompts showed drastic improvement compared to GPT-4 with automatic prompting strategies. fully automated prompt engineering with no human in the loop requires more study and improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T00:21:00Z)
• Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 [66.1188263570629]
  GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. We demonstrate that GPT-4 can solve novel and difficult tasks that span mathematics, coding, vision, medicine, law, psychology and more. We believe GPT-4 could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T16:51:28Z)
• On the Educational Impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence Ready to Obtain a University Degree? [0.0]
  We evaluate the influence of ChatGPT on university education. We discuss how computer science higher education should adapt to tools like ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:27:37Z)
• AI and the FCI: Can ChatGPT Project an Understanding of Introductory Physics? [0.0]
  ChatGPT is a groundbreaking AI interface built on a large language model that was trained on an enormous corpus of human text to emulate human conversation. We present a preliminary analysis of how two versions of ChatGPT fare in the field of first-semester university physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T08:43:11Z)
• ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none [4.693597927153063]
  OpenAI has released the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) We examined ChatGPT's capabilities on 25 diverse analytical NLP tasks. We automated ChatGPT and GPT-4 prompting process and analyzed more than 49k responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T15:20:37Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• Instance-wise Prompt Tuning for Pretrained Language Models [72.74916121511662]
  Instance-wise Prompt Tuning (IPT) is the first prompt learning paradigm that injects knowledge from the input data instances to the prompts. IPT significantly outperforms task-based prompt learning methods, and achieves comparable performance to conventional finetuning with only 0.5% - 1.5% of tuned parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T10:08:50Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.