On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07401v4
• Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:28:00 GMT
• Title: On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment
• Authors: Dun Zeng, Yong Dai, Pengyu Cheng, Longyue Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wanshun Chen, Nan Du, Zenglin Xu,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the impact of diversified preferences on reward modeling. We find that diversified preference data negatively affect the calibration performance of reward models. We propose a novel Multi-Objective Reward learning method to enhance the calibration performance of RMs on shared preferences.
• Score: 51.26149027399505
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences has been recognized as the key to improving LLMs' interaction quality. However, in this pluralistic world, human preferences can be diversified due to annotators' different tastes, which hinders the effectiveness of LLM alignment methods. This paper presents the first quantitative analysis of commonly used human feedback datasets to investigate the impact of diversified preferences on reward modeling. Our analysis reveals a correlation between the calibration performance of reward models (RMs) and the alignment performance of LLMs. We find that diversified preference data negatively affect the calibration performance of RMs on human-shared preferences, such as Harmless\&Helpful, thereby impairing the alignment performance of LLMs. To address the ineffectiveness, we propose a novel Multi-Objective Reward learning method (MORE) to enhance the calibration performance of RMs on shared preferences. We validate our findings by experiments on three models and five human preference datasets. Our method significantly improves the prediction calibration of RMs, leading to better alignment of the Alpaca-7B model with Harmless\&Helpful preferences. Furthermore, the connection between reward calibration and preference alignment performance suggests that calibration error can be adopted as a key metric for evaluating RMs. The open-source code and data are available at https://github.com/dunzeng/MORE.

Related papers

• Ensemble Bayesian Inference: Leveraging Small Language Models to Achieve LLM-level Accuracy in Profile Matching Tasks [0.0]
  This study explores the potential of small language model(SLM) ensembles to achieve accuracy comparable to proprietary large language models (LLMs) We propose Ensemble Bayesian Inference (EBI), a novel approach that applies Bayesian estimation to combine judgments from multiple SLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:55:10Z)
• IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier [1.8921784053120494]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the primary method for aligning large language models with human preferences. We propose Implicit Preference Optimization (IPO), an alternative approach that leverages generative language models as preference classifiers. Our findings demonstrate that models trained through IPO achieve performance comparable to those utilizing state-of-the-art reward models for obtaining preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T10:59:11Z)
• Disentangling Length Bias In Preference Learning Via Response-Conditioned Modeling [87.17041933863041]
  We introduce a Response-conditioned Bradley-Terry (Rc-BT) model that enhances the reward model's capability in length bias mitigating and length instruction following. We also propose the Rc-DPO algorithm to leverage the Rc-BT model for direct policy optimization (DPO) of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T14:50:25Z)
• Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles [4.477423478591491]
  Calib-n is a novel framework that trains an auxiliary model for confidence estimation. We find that few-shot prompts are the most effective for auxiliary model-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T18:48:42Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications. Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge. We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective [4.548047308860141]
  This study investigates the impact of different type of preference data on model performance. It aims to reduce their dependency on extensive amounts of preference data, which is expensive to collect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T00:11:41Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• BAPO: Base-Anchored Preference Optimization for Overcoming Forgetting in Large Language Models Personalization [26.526171463511332]
  This paper examines the impact of personalized preference optimization on Large Language Models (LLMs) BAPO effectively adapts to diverse user preferences while minimally affecting global knowledge or general alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T13:30:04Z)
• A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models [81.41868485811625]
  The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning. This survey covers the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:52:51Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• MaxMin-RLHF: Towards Equitable Alignment of Large Language Models with Diverse Human Preferences [101.57443597426374]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models to human preferences by employing a singular reward model derived from preference data. We learn a mixture of preference distributions via an expectation-maximization algorithm to better represent diverse human preferences. Our algorithm achieves an average improvement of more than 16% in win-rates over conventional RLHF algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:56:27Z)
• Interactive Hyperparameter Optimization in Multi-Objective Problems via Preference Learning [65.51668094117802]
  We propose a human-centered interactive HPO approach tailored towards multi-objective machine learning (ML) Instead of relying on the user guessing the most suitable indicator for their needs, our approach automatically learns an appropriate indicator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T09:22:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.