Understanding (Un)Intended Memorization in Text-to-Image Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07550v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 19:53:17 GMT
• Title: Understanding (Un)Intended Memorization in Text-to-Image Generative Models
• Authors: Ali Naseh, Jaechul Roh, Amir Houmansadr
• Abstract summary: We introduce a specialized definition of memorization tailored to text-to-image models, categorizing it into three distinct types according to user expectations. We examine the subtle distinctions between intended and unintended memorization, emphasizing the importance of balancing user privacy with the generative quality of the model outputs.
• Score: 16.447035745151428
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal machine learning, especially text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 3, has gained significance for transforming text into detailed images. Despite their growing use and remarkable generative capabilities, there is a pressing need for a detailed examination of these models' behavior, particularly with respect to memorization. Historically, memorization in machine learning has been context-dependent, with diverse definitions emerging from classification tasks to complex models like Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion models. Yet, a definitive concept of memorization that aligns with the intricacies of text-to-image synthesis remains elusive. This understanding is vital as memorization poses privacy risks yet is essential for meeting user expectations, especially when generating representations of underrepresented entities. In this paper, we introduce a specialized definition of memorization tailored to text-to-image models, categorizing it into three distinct types according to user expectations. We closely examine the subtle distinctions between intended and unintended memorization, emphasizing the importance of balancing user privacy with the generative quality of the model outputs. Using the Stable Diffusion model, we offer examples to validate our memorization definitions and clarify their application.

Related papers

• A Geometric Framework for Understanding Memorization in Generative Models [11.263296715798374]
  Recent work has shown that deep generative models can be capable of memorizing and reproducing training datapoints when deployed. These findings call into question the usability of generative models, especially in light of the legal and privacy risks brought about by memorization. We propose the manifold memorization hypothesis (MMH), a geometric framework which leverages the manifold hypothesis into a clear language in which to reason about memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:09:01Z)
• Human-Object Interaction Detection Collaborated with Large Relation-driven Diffusion Models [65.82564074712836]
  We introduce DIFfusionHOI, a new HOI detector shedding light on text-to-image diffusion models. We first devise an inversion-based strategy to learn the expression of relation patterns between humans and objects in embedding space. These learned relation embeddings then serve as textual prompts, to steer diffusion models generate images that depict specific interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T12:00:33Z)
• Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models [67.49068128909349]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently memorize long sequences verbatim, often with serious legal and privacy implications. We develop a framework to study verbatim memorization in a controlled setting by continuing pre-training from Pythia checkpoints with injected sequences. We find that (1) non-trivial amounts of repetition are necessary for verbatim memorization to happen; (2) later (and presumably better) checkpoints are more likely to memorize verbatim sequences, even for out-of-distribution sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T07:10:31Z)
• Memorized Images in Diffusion Models share a Subspace that can be Located and Deleted [15.162296378581853]
  Large-scale text-to-image diffusion models excel in generating high-quality images from textual inputs. Concerns arise as research indicates their tendency to memorize and replicate training data. Efforts within the text-to-image community to address memorization explore causes such as data duplication, replicated captions, or trigger tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T15:47:13Z)
• Could It Be Generated? Towards Practical Analysis of Memorization in Text-To-Image Diffusion Models [39.607005089747936]
  We perform practical analysis of memorization in text-to-image diffusion models. We identify three necessary conditions of memorization, respectively similarity, existence and probability. We then reveal the correlation between the model's prediction error and image replication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T15:32:00Z)
• Unveiling and Mitigating Memorization in Text-to-image Diffusion Models through Cross Attention [62.671435607043875]
  Research indicates that text-to-image diffusion models replicate images from their training data, raising tremendous concerns about potential copyright infringement and privacy risks. We reveal that during memorization, the cross-attention tends to focus disproportionately on the embeddings of specific tokens. We introduce an innovative approach to detect and mitigate memorization in diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T01:27:00Z)
• ROME: Memorization Insights from Text, Logits and Representation [17.458840481902644]
  This paper proposes an innovative approach named ROME that bypasses direct processing of the training data. Specifically, we select datasets categorized into three distinct types -- context-independent, conventional, and factual. Our analysis then focuses on disparities between memorized and non-memorized samples by examining the logits and representations of generated texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T13:15:30Z)
• Deep Variational Privacy Funnel: General Modeling with Applications in Face Recognition [3.351714665243138]
  We develop a method for privacy-preserving representation learning using an end-to-end training framework. We apply our model to state-of-the-art face recognition systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T11:32:53Z)
• Exploring Memorization in Fine-tuned Language Models [53.52403444655213]
  We conduct the first comprehensive analysis to explore language models' memorization during fine-tuning across tasks. Our studies with open-sourced and our own fine-tuned LMs across various tasks indicate that memorization presents a strong disparity among different fine-tuning tasks. We provide an intuitive explanation of this task disparity via sparse coding theory and unveil a strong correlation between memorization and attention score distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T15:41:26Z)
• Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models [61.58529162310382]
  Large language models (LMs) have been shown to memorize parts of their training data, and when prompted appropriately, they will emit the memorized data verbatim. This is undesirable because memorization violates privacy (exposing user data), degrades utility (repeated easy-to-memorize text is often low quality), and hurts fairness (some texts are memorized over others). We describe three log-linear relationships that quantify the degree to which LMs emit memorized training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:48:31Z)
• Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Models [91.8747020391287]
  Modern neural language models that are widely used in various NLP tasks risk memorizing sensitive information from their training data. An open question in previous studies of language model memorization is how to filter out "common" memorization. We formulate a notion of counterfactual memorization which characterizes how a model's predictions change if a particular document is omitted during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-24T04:20:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.