Proving Conjectures Acquired by Composing Multiple Biases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08990v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:40:11 GMT
• Title: Proving Conjectures Acquired by Composing Multiple Biases
• Authors: Jovial Cheukam-Ngouonou, Ramiz Gindullin, Nicolas Beldiceanu, R\'emi Douence, Claude-Guy Quimper
• Abstract summary: We present the proofs of the conjectures mentioned in the paper published in the proceedings of the 2024 AAAI conference. We also present the decomposition methods presented in the same paper.
• Score: 4.117347527143616
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present the proofs of the conjectures mentioned in the paper published in the proceedings of the 2024 AAAI conference [1], and discovered by the decomposition methods presented in the same paper.

Related papers

• Analysis of the ICML 2023 Ranking Data: Can Authors' Opinions of Their Own Papers Assist Peer Review in Machine Learning? [52.00419656272129]
  We conducted an experiment during the 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) We received 1,342 rankings, each from a distinct author, pertaining to 2,592 submissions. We focus on the Isotonic Mechanism, which calibrates raw review scores using author-provided rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T01:51:23Z)
• Another quantum version of Sanov theorem [53.64687146666141]
  We study how to extend Sanov theorem to the quantum setting. We propose another quantum version of Sanov theorem by considering the quantum analog of the empirical distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T07:46:30Z)
• The Solution for The PST-KDD-2024 OAG-Challenge [3.0116058513816224]
  We introduce the second-place solution in the KDD-2024 OAG-Challenge paper source tracing track. Our solution is mainly based on two methods, BERT and GCN, and combines the reasoning results of BERT and GCN in the final submission. In the end, our solution achieved a remarkable score of 0.47691 in the competition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T14:15:05Z)
• Evo* 2023 -- Late-Breaking Abstracts Volume [0.0]
  Volume with the Late-Breaking Abstracts submitted to the Evo* 2023 Conference, held in Brno (Czech Republic) These papers present ongoing research and preliminary results investigating on the application of different approaches of Bioinspired Methods to different problems, most of them real world ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T19:42:11Z)
• On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding [71.43634536456844]
  Collusion rings pose a major threat to the peer-review systems of computer science conferences. One approach to solve this problem would be to detect the colluding reviewers from their manipulated bids. No research has yet established that detecting collusion rings is even possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:12:09Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• EFaR 2023: Efficient Face Recognition Competition [51.77649060180531]
  The paper presents the summary of the Efficient Face Recognition Competition (EFaR) held at the 2023 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB 2023) The competition received 17 submissions from 6 different teams. The submitted solutions are ranked based on a weighted score of the achieved verification accuracies on a diverse set of benchmarks, as well as the deployability given by the number of floating-point operations and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T09:58:22Z)
• Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment [86.77085171670323]
  We present a larger-scale variant of the 2014 NeurIPS experiment in which 10% of conference submissions were reviewed by two independent committees to quantify the randomness in the review process. We observe that the two committees disagree on their accept/reject recommendations for 23% of the papers and that, consistent with the results from 2014, approximately half of the list of accepted papers would change if the review process were randomly rerun.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T21:26:12Z)
• Matching Papers and Reviewers at Large Conferences [25.79501640609188]
  This paper studies a novel reviewer-paper matching approach that was recently deployed in the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2021) This approach has three main elements: (1) collecting and processing input data to identify problematic matches and generate reviewer-paper scores; (2) formulating and solving an optimization problem to find good reviewer-paper matchings; and (3) the introduction of a novel, two-phase reviewing process that shifted reviewing resources away from papers likely to be rejected and towards papers closer to the decision boundary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T18:13:43Z)
• Investigation of the PPT Squared Conjecture for High Dimensions [0.0]
  We present the positive-partial-transpose squared conjecture introduced by M. Christandl. We offer two novel approaches (decomposition and composition of quantum channels) and several schemes for finding counterexamples to this conjecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T16:26:57Z)
• A combinatorial conjecture from PAC-Bayesian machine learning [0.0]
  We present a proof of a conjecture from the second author's Ph.D. thesis. The proof relies on binomial and multinomial sums identities. We discuss the relevance of the conjecture in the context of PAC-Bayesian machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T04:36:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.