Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10102v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 02:26:35 GMT
• Title: Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models
• Authors: Quang-Duy Tran, Bao Duong, Phuoc Nguyen, Thin Nguyen
• Abstract summary: Student's $t$-distribution is known for its robustness in accounting for sampling variability with smaller sample sizes and extreme values without significantly altering the overall distribution shape. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimators are more robust and achieve better overall performance across synthetic and real benchmarks.
• Score: 7.568978862189266
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Distinguishing the cause and effect from bivariate observational data is the foundational problem that finds applications in many scientific disciplines. One solution to this problem is assuming that cause and effect are generated from a structural causal model, enabling identification of the causal direction after estimating the model in each direction. The heteroscedastic noise model is a type of structural causal model where the cause can contribute to both the mean and variance of the noise. Current methods for estimating heteroscedastic noise models choose the Gaussian likelihood as the optimization objective which can be suboptimal and unstable when the data has a non-Gaussian distribution. To address this limitation, we propose a novel approach to estimating this model with Student's $t$-distribution, which is known for its robustness in accounting for sampling variability with smaller sample sizes and extreme values without significantly altering the overall distribution shape. This adaptability is beneficial for capturing the parameters of the noise distribution in heteroscedastic noise models. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimators are more robust and achieve better overall performance across synthetic and real benchmarks.

Related papers

• Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit [17.39376866275623]
  We propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T17:59:56Z)
• A Skewness-Based Criterion for Addressing Heteroscedastic Noise in Causal Discovery [47.36895591886043]
  We investigate heteroscedastic symmetric noise models (HSNMs) We introduce a novel criterion for identifying HSNMs based on the skewness of the score (i.e., the gradient of the log density) of the data distribution. We propose SkewScore, an algorithm that handles heteroscedastic noise without requiring the extraction of external noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T22:28:30Z)
• Cause-Effect Inference in Location-Scale Noise Models: Maximum Likelihood vs. Independence Testing [19.23479356810746]
  A fundamental problem of causal discovery is cause-effect inference, learning the correct causal direction between two random variables. Recently introduced heteroscedastic location-scale noise functional models (LSNMs) combine expressive power with identifiability guarantees. We show that LSNM model selection based on maximizing likelihood achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, when the noise distributions are correctly specified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T20:48:32Z)
• Optimizing the Noise in Self-Supervised Learning: from Importance Sampling to Noise-Contrastive Estimation [80.07065346699005]
  It is widely assumed that the optimal noise distribution should be made equal to the data distribution, as in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) We turn to Noise-Contrastive Estimation which grounds this self-supervised task as an estimation problem of an energy-based model of the data. We soberly conclude that the optimal noise may be hard to sample from, and the gain in efficiency can be modest compared to choosing the noise distribution equal to the data's.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T19:57:58Z)
• The Optimal Noise in Noise-Contrastive Learning Is Not What You Think [80.07065346699005]
  We show that deviating from this assumption can actually lead to better statistical estimators. In particular, the optimal noise distribution is different from the data's and even from a different family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T13:59:20Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariance [76.54300276636982]
  Noise in gradient descent provides a crucial implicit regularization effect for training over parameterized models. We show that parameter-dependent noise -- induced by mini-batches or label perturbation -- is far more effective than Gaussian noise. Our analysis reveals that parameter-dependent noise introduces a bias towards local minima with smaller noise variance, whereas spherical Gaussian noise does not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T18:31:02Z)
• Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
  empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear. We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance. A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.