The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10269v3
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:22:11 GMT
• Title: The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Media
• Authors: Amaury Trujillo, Tiziano Fagni, Stefano Cresci,
• Abstract summary: We analyze all 353.12M records submitted by the eight largest social media platforms in the EU during the first 100 days of the database. Our findings have far-reaching implications for policymakers and scholars across diverse disciplines.
• Score: 0.4597131601929317
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Since September 2023, the Digital Services Act (DSA) obliges large online platforms to submit detailed data on each moderation action they take within the European Union (EU) to the DSA Transparency Database. From its inception, this centralized database has sparked scholarly interest as an unprecedented and potentially unique trove of data on real-world online moderation. Here, we thoroughly analyze all 353.12M records submitted by the eight largest social media platforms in the EU during the first 100 days of the database. Specifically, we conduct a platform-wise comparative study of their: volume of moderation actions, grounds for decision, types of applied restrictions, types of moderated content, timeliness in undertaking and submitting moderation actions, and use of automation. Furthermore, we systematically cross-check the contents of the database with the platforms' own transparency reports. Our analyses reveal that (i) the platforms adhered only in part to the philosophy and structure of the database, (ii) the structure of the database is partially inadequate for the platforms' reporting needs, (iii) the platforms exhibited substantial differences in their moderation actions, (iv) a remarkable fraction of the database data is inconsistent, (v) the platform X (formerly Twitter) presents the most inconsistencies. Our findings have far-reaching implications for policymakers and scholars across diverse disciplines. They offer guidance for future regulations that cater to the reporting needs of online platforms in general, but also highlight opportunities to improve and refine the database itself.

Related papers

• Visual Data Diagnosis and Debiasing with Concept Graphs [50.84781894621378]
  Deep learning models often pick up inherent biases in the data during the training process, leading to unreliable predictions. We present CONBIAS, a novel framework for diagnosing and mitigating Concept co-occurrence Biases in visual datasets. We show that by employing a novel clique-based concept balancing strategy, we can mitigate these imbalances, leading to enhanced performance on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T16:59:01Z)
• GRAM: Generative Retrieval Augmented Matching of Data Schemas in the Context of Data Security [5.22260190195909]
  This study revisits the foundational problem within the context of large language models. Adhering to increasingly stringent data security policies, our focus lies on the zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. The capability to accurately match attributes under such stringent requirements distinguishes our work from previous literature in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T01:08:00Z)
• PRICE: A Pretrained Model for Cross-Database Cardinality Estimation [78.30959470441442]
  Cardinality estimation (CardEst) is essential for optimizing query execution plans. Recent ML-based CardEst methods achieve high accuracy but face deployment challenges due to high preparation costs. We propose PRICE, a PRetrained multI-table CardEst model, which addresses these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T06:21:53Z)
• Automated Transparency: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Digital Services Act Transparency Database [6.070078201123852]
  The Digital Services Act (DSA) was adopted on 1 November 2022 with the ambition to set a global example in terms of accountability and transparency. The DSA emphasizes the need for online platforms to report on their content moderation decisions (statements of reasons' - SoRs) SoRs are currently made available in the DSA Transparency Database, launched by the European Commission in September 2023. This study aims to understand whether the Transparency Database helps the DSA to live up to its transparency promises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T17:51:20Z)
• BUSTER: a "BUSiness Transaction Entity Recognition" dataset [0.9187159782788578]
  BUSiness dataset consists of 3779 manually annotated documents on financial transactions. Best performing model is also used to automatically annotate 6196 documents, which we release as an additional silver corpus to BUSTER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T12:39:57Z)
• Content Moderation on Social Media in the EU: Insights From the DSA Transparency Database [0.0]
  Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large social media platforms in the EU to provide clear and specific information whenever they restrict access to certain content. Statements of Reasons (SoRs) are collected in the DSA Transparency Database to ensure transparency and scrutiny of content moderation decisions. We empirically analyze 156 million SoRs within an observation period of two months to provide an early look at content moderation decisions of social media platforms in the EU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:19Z)
• A User-Driven Framework for Regulating and Auditing Social Media [94.70018274127231]
  We propose that algorithmic filtering should be regulated with respect to a flexible, user-driven baseline. We require that the feeds a platform filters contain "similar" informational content as their respective baseline feeds. We present an auditing procedure that checks whether a platform honors this requirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T17:53:34Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• CHEF: A Pilot Chinese Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact-Checking [55.75590135151682]
  CHEF is the first CHinese Evidence-based Fact-checking dataset of 10K real-world claims. The dataset covers multiple domains, ranging from politics to public health, and provides annotated evidence retrieved from the Internet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T09:11:03Z)
• What Stops Learning-based 3D Registration from Working in the Real World? [53.68326201131434]
  This work identifies the sources of 3D point cloud registration failures, analyze the reasons behind them, and propose solutions. Ultimately, this translates to a best-practice 3D registration network (BPNet), constituting the first learning-based method able to handle previously-unseen objects in real-world data. Our model generalizes to real data without any fine-tuning, reaching an accuracy of up to 67% on point clouds of unseen objects obtained with a commercial sensor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T19:24:27Z)
• Towards a Natural Language Query Processing System [0.0]
  This paper reports our study on the design and development of a natural language query interface to a backend relational database. The novelty in the study lies in defining a graph database as a middle layer to store necessary metadata needed to transform a natural language query into structured query language. The translation results for some sample queries yielded a 90% accuracy rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T19:52:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.