Towards Consistent Language Models Using Declarative Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15472v1
• Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 12:53:07 GMT
• Title: Towards Consistent Language Models Using Declarative Constraints
• Authors: Jasmin Mousavi and Arash Termehchy
• Abstract summary: Large language models have shown unprecedented abilities in generating linguistically coherent and syntactically correct natural language output. They often return incorrect and inconsistent answers to input questions. It is challenging to modify language models such that they provide correct and consistent results.
• Score: 4.218866843626937
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have shown unprecedented abilities in generating linguistically coherent and syntactically correct natural language output. However, they often return incorrect and inconsistent answers to input questions. Due to the complexity and uninterpretability of the internally learned representations, it is challenging to modify language models such that they provide correct and consistent results. The data management community has developed various methods and tools for providing consistent answers over inconsistent datasets. In these methods, users specify the desired properties of data in a domain in the form of high-level declarative constraints. This approach has provided usable and scalable methods to delivering consistent information from inconsistent datasets. We aim to build upon this success and leverage these methods to modify language models such that they deliver consistent and accurate results. We investigate the challenges of using these ideas to obtain consistent and relevant answers from language models and report some preliminary empirical studies.

Related papers

• EqualizeIR: Mitigating Linguistic Biases in Retrieval Models [14.755831733659699]
  Existing information retrieval (IR) models show significant biases based on the linguistic complexity of input queries. We propose EqualizeIR, a framework to mitigate linguistic biases in IR models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T03:24:34Z)
• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Relation-based Counterfactual Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Robustifying Natural Language Inference Models [0.0]
  We propose a method in which we use token-based and sentence-based augmentation methods to generate counterfactual sentence pairs. We show that the proposed method can improve the performance and robustness of the NLI model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T03:43:25Z)
• Is It Good Data for Multilingual Instruction Tuning or Just Bad Multilingual Evaluation for Large Language Models? [17.011882550422452]
  It is unknown whether the nature of the instruction data has an impact on the model output. It is questionable whether translated test sets can capture such nuances. We show that native or generation benchmarks reveal a notable difference between native and translated instruction data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:43:47Z)
• Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models [60.522749986793094]
  We draw on three years of experience in evaluating large language models to provide guidance and lessons for researchers. We present the Language Model Evaluation Harness (lm-eval), an open source library for independent, reproducible, and evaluation of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T16:50:49Z)
• Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
  Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies. We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z)
• We're Calling an Intervention: Exploring the Fundamental Hurdles in Adapting Language Models to Nonstandard Text [8.956635443376527]
  We present a suite of experiments that allow us to understand the underlying challenges of language model adaptation to nonstandard text. We do so by designing interventions that approximate several types of linguistic variation and their interactions with existing biases of language models. Applying our interventions during language model adaptation with varying size and nature of training data, we gain important insights into when knowledge transfer can be successful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T18:56:53Z)
• Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context [29.315230178997002]
  We investigate how the model problem-solving accuracy can be influenced by irrelevant context. We use benchmark to measure the distractibility of cutting-edge prompting techniques for large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:48:57Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Probing via Prompting [71.7904179689271]
  This paper introduces a novel model-free approach to probing, by formulating probing as a prompting task. We conduct experiments on five probing tasks and show that our approach is comparable or better at extracting information than diagnostic probes. We then examine the usefulness of a specific linguistic property for pre-training by removing the heads that are essential to that property and evaluating the resulting model's performance on language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T22:14:40Z)
• How Does Data Corruption Affect Natural Language Understanding Models? A Study on GLUE datasets [4.645287693363387]
  We show that performance remains high for most GLUE tasks when the models are fine-tuned or tested on corrupted data. Our proposed data transformations can be used as a diagnostic tool for assessing the extent to which a specific dataset constitutes a proper testbed for evaluating models' language understanding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T13:35:53Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Data Augmentation for Spoken Language Understanding via Pretrained Language Models [113.56329266325902]
  Training of spoken language understanding (SLU) models often faces the problem of data scarcity. We put forward a data augmentation method using pretrained language models to boost the variability and accuracy of generated utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T04:07:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.