"My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub Sponsors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02755v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:07:04 GMT
• Title: "My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub Sponsors
• Authors: Youmei Fan, Tao Xiao, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude, Kenichi Matsumoto
• Abstract summary: GitHub Sponsors was launched in 2019, enabling donations to open-source software developers. A 2022 study on GitHub Sponsors found that only two-fifths of developers who were seeking sponsorship received a donation. We investigate the impact of tweets that contain links to GitHub Sponsors profiles on sponsorship, as well as their reception on Twitter/X.
• Score: 11.620351603683496
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: GitHub Sponsors was launched in 2019, enabling donations to open-source software developers to provide financial support, as per GitHub's slogan: "Invest in the projects you depend on". However, a 2022 study on GitHub Sponsors found that only two-fifths of developers who were seeking sponsorship received a donation. The study found that, other than internal actions (such as offering perks to sponsors), developers had advertised their GitHub Sponsors profiles on social media, such as Twitter (also known as X). Therefore, in this work, we investigate the impact of tweets that contain links to GitHub Sponsors profiles on sponsorship, as well as their reception on Twitter/X. We further characterize these tweets to understand their context and find that (1) such tweets have the impact of increasing the number of sponsors acquired, (2) compared to other donation platforms such as Open Collective and Patreon, GitHub Sponsors has significantly fewer interactions but is more visible on Twitter/X, and (3) developers tend to contribute more to open-source software during the week of posting such tweets. Our findings are the first step toward investigating the impact of social media on obtaining funding to sustain open-source software.

Related papers

• Social Media Reactions to Open Source Promotions: AI-Powered GitHub Projects on Hacker News [1.6842686573313703]
  We investigate the relationship between Hacker News and developer activity on the promoted GitHub AI projects.<n>At least 19% of AI developers promoted their GitHub projects on Hacker News, often receiving positive engagement from the community.<n>These results suggest that Hacker News serves as a viable platform for AI-powered OSS projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T22:03:52Z)
• Analyzing the Usage of Donation Platforms for PyPI Libraries [91.97201077607862]
  This study analyzes the adoption of donation platforms in the PyPI ecosystem. GitHub Sponsors is the dominant platform, though many PyPI-listed links are outdated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T10:27:31Z)
• 4.5 Million (Suspected) Fake Stars in GitHub: A Growing Spiral of Popularity Contests, Scams, and Malware [58.60545935390151]
  We present a global, longitudinal measurement study of fake stars in GitHub. We build StarScout, a scalable tool able to detect anomalous starring behaviors. Our study has implications for platform moderators, open-source practitioners, and supply chain security researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T03:03:58Z)
• The Impact of Sanctions on GitHub Developers and Activities [10.456917780704911]
  GitHub has fueled the creation of truly global software. As software becomes more entwined with global politics and social regulations, it becomes similarly subject to government sanctions. In 2019, GitHub restricted access to certain services for users in specific locations but rolled back these restrictions for some communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T13:11:11Z)
• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• How do Software Engineering Researchers Use GitHub? An Empirical Study of Artifacts & Impact [0.2209921757303168]
  We ask whether and how authors engage in social coding related to their research. Ten thousand papers in top SE research venues, hand-annotating their GitHub links, and studying 309 paper-related repositories. We find a wide distribution in popularity and impact, some strongly correlated with publication venue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T18:56:33Z)
• Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Data [39.98744837726886]
  We have collected all 375 million tweets published within a 24-hour time period starting on September 21, 2022. This is the first complete 24-hour Twitter dataset that is available for the research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T21:28:40Z)
• GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process [7.047566396769727]
  This study investigates how projects use GitHub Actions, what the developers discuss about them, and how project activity indicators change after their adoption. Our results indicate that 1,489 out of 5,000 most popular repositories (almost 30% of our sample) adopt GitHub Actions. Our findings also suggest that the adoption of GitHub Actions leads to more rejections of pull requests (PRs), more communication in accepted PRs and less communication in rejected PRs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T16:24:17Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• Promoting and countering misinformation during Australia's 2019-2020 bushfires: A case study of polarisation [0.11470070927586014]
  misinformation blaming arson resurfaced on Twitter during Australia's unprecedented bushfires. We study Twitter communities spreading this misinformation during the population-level event, and investigate the role of online communities and bots. We find that Supporters promoted misinformation by engaging others directly with replies and mentions using hashtags and links to external sources. We speculate that the communication strategies observed here could be discoverable in other misinformation-related discussions and could inform counter-strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T03:44:31Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• How COVID-19 Have Changed Crowdfunding: Evidence From GoFundMe [77.34726150561087]
  This study uses a unique data set of all the campaigns published over the past two years on GoFundMe. We study a corpus of crowdfunded projects, analyzing cover images and other variables commonly present on crowdfunding sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T08:03:58Z)
• Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech [0.6999740786886536]
  We deploy advanced deep learning to produce high quality hate speech classification models. We create retweet networks, detect communities and monitor their evolution through time. Hate speech is dominated by offensive tweets, related to political and ideological issues. About 60% of unacceptable tweets are produced by a single right-wing community of only moderate size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T11:43:19Z)
• Privacy-Aware Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter's Home Timeline [47.434392695347924]
  RecSys 2020 Challenge organized by ACM RecSys in partnership with Twitter using this dataset. This paper touches on the key challenges faced by researchers and professionals striving to predict user engagements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T23:54:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.