Causative Insights into Open Source Software Security using Large Language Code Embeddings and Semantic Vulnerability Graph

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07035v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:33:22 GMT
• Title: Causative Insights into Open Source Software Security using Large Language Code Embeddings and Semantic Vulnerability Graph
• Authors: Nafis Tanveer Islam, Gonzalo De La Torre Parra, Dylan Manual, Murtuza Jadliwala, Peyman Najafirad
• Abstract summary: Open Source Software (OSS) vulnerabilities can cause unauthorized access, data breaches, network disruptions, and privacy violations. Recent deep-learning techniques have shown great promise in identifying and localizing vulnerabilities in source code. Our study shows a 24% improvement in code repair capabilities compared to previous methods.
• Score: 3.623199159688412
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Open Source Software (OSS) security and resilience are worldwide phenomena hampering economic and technological innovation. OSS vulnerabilities can cause unauthorized access, data breaches, network disruptions, and privacy violations, rendering any benefits worthless. While recent deep-learning techniques have shown great promise in identifying and localizing vulnerabilities in source code, it is unclear how effective these research techniques are from a usability perspective due to a lack of proper methodological analysis. Usually, these methods offload a developer's task of classifying and localizing vulnerable code; still, a reasonable study to measure the actual effectiveness of these systems to the end user has yet to be conducted. To address the challenge of proper developer training from the prior methods, we propose a system to link vulnerabilities to their root cause, thereby intuitively educating the developers to code more securely. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive usability study to test the effectiveness of our system in fixing vulnerabilities and its capability to assist developers in writing more secure code. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system by showing its efficacy in helping developers fix source code with vulnerabilities. Our study shows a 24% improvement in code repair capabilities compared to previous methods. We also show that, when trained by our system, on average, approximately 9% of the developers naturally tend to write more secure code with fewer vulnerabilities.

Related papers

• Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval [20.959848710829878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation and code repair. However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, raises the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities. We aim to present a comprehensive study aimed at precisely evaluating and enhancing the security aspects of code LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T16:13:21Z)
• On Security Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Systems [32.14068820256729]
  We specifically look into deep learning (DL) framework and perform the first systematic study of vulnerabilities in DL systems. We propose a two-stream data analysis framework to explore vulnerability patterns from various databases. We conducted a large-scale empirical study of 3,049 DL vulnerabilities to better understand the patterns of vulnerability and the challenges in fixing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T23:04:13Z)
• FaultGuard: A Generative Approach to Resilient Fault Prediction in Smart Electrical Grids [53.2306792009435]
  FaultGuard is the first framework for fault type and zone classification resilient to adversarial attacks. We propose a low-complexity fault prediction model and an online adversarial training technique to enhance robustness. Our model outclasses the state-of-the-art for resilient fault prediction benchmarking, with an accuracy of up to 0.958.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T08:51:23Z)
• Profile of Vulnerability Remediations in Dependencies Using Graph Analysis [40.35284812745255]
  This research introduces graph analysis methods and a modified Graph Attention Convolutional Neural Network (GAT) model. We analyze control flow graphs to profile breaking changes in applications occurring from dependency upgrades intended to remediate vulnerabilities. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the enhanced GAT model in offering nuanced insights into the relational dynamics of code vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T02:01:47Z)
• LLM-Powered Code Vulnerability Repair with Reinforcement Learning and Semantic Reward [3.729516018513228]
  We introduce a multipurpose code vulnerability analysis system textttSecRepair, powered by a large language model, CodeGen2. Inspired by how humans fix code issues, we propose an instruction-based dataset suitable for vulnerability analysis with LLMs. We identify zero-day and N-day vulnerabilities in 6 Open Source IoT Operating Systems on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T02:46:39Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Generation: A Dataset-driven Study on Vulnerability Mitigation [24.668682498171776]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation, benefiting both novice and experienced developers. However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, introduces the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive study focused on evaluating and enhancing code LLMs from a software security perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T00:32:56Z)
• REEF: A Framework for Collecting Real-World Vulnerabilities and Fixes [40.401211102969356]
  We propose an automated collecting framework REEF to collect REal-world vulnErabilities and Fixes from open-source repositories. We develop a multi-language crawler to collect vulnerabilities and their fixes, and design metrics to filter for high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach can collect high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs and generate strong explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T02:50:08Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Developing Hands-on Labs for Source Code Vulnerability Detection with AI [0.0]
  We propose a framework including learning modules and hands on labs to guide future IT professionals towards developing secure programming habits. This thesis our goal is to design learning modules with a set of hands on labs that will introduce students to secure programming practices using source code and log file analysis tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T20:53:58Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.