AiGen-FoodReview: A Multimodal Dataset of Machine-Generated Restaurant
Reviews and Images on Social Media
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08825v1
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:57:36 GMT
- Title: AiGen-FoodReview: A Multimodal Dataset of Machine-Generated Restaurant
Reviews and Images on Social Media
- Authors: Alessandro Gambetti, Qiwei Han
- Abstract summary: AiGen-FoodReview is a dataset of 20,144 restaurant review-image pairs divided into authentic and machine-generated.
We explore unimodal and multimodal detection models, achieving 99.80% multimodal accuracy with FLAVA.
The paper contributes by open-sourcing the dataset and releasing fake review detectors, recommending its use in unimodal and multimodal fake review detection tasks, and evaluating linguistic and visual features in synthetic versus authentic data.
- Score: 57.70351255180495
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Online reviews in the form of user-generated content (UGC) significantly
impact consumer decision-making. However, the pervasive issue of not only human
fake content but also machine-generated content challenges UGC's reliability.
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) may pave the way to fabricate
indistinguishable fake generated content at a much lower cost. Leveraging
OpenAI's GPT-4-Turbo and DALL-E-2 models, we craft AiGen-FoodReview, a
multi-modal dataset of 20,144 restaurant review-image pairs divided into
authentic and machine-generated. We explore unimodal and multimodal detection
models, achieving 99.80% multimodal accuracy with FLAVA. We use attributes from
readability and photographic theories to score reviews and images,
respectively, demonstrating their utility as hand-crafted features in scalable
and interpretable detection models, with comparable performance. The paper
contributes by open-sourcing the dataset and releasing fake review detectors,
recommending its use in unimodal and multimodal fake review detection tasks,
and evaluating linguistic and visual features in synthetic versus authentic
data.
Related papers
- LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.
LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.
We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z) - MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)
MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.
It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z) - Pushing Boundaries: Exploring Zero Shot Object Classification with Large
Multimodal Models [0.09264362806173355]
Large Language and Vision Assistant models (LLVAs) engage users in rich conversational experiences intertwined with image-based queries.
This paper takes a unique perspective on LMMs, exploring their efficacy in performing image classification tasks using tailored prompts.
Our study includes a benchmarking analysis across four diverse datasets: MNIST, Cats Vs. Dogs, Hymnoptera (Ants Vs. Bees), and an unconventional dataset comprising Pox Vs. Non-Pox skin images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-30T03:19:54Z) - StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized
Image-Dialogue Data [129.92449761766025]
We propose a novel data collection methodology that synchronously synthesizes images and dialogues for visual instruction tuning.
This approach harnesses the power of generative models, marrying the abilities of ChatGPT and text-to-image generative models.
Our research includes comprehensive experiments conducted on various datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-20T12:43:52Z) - Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of
Open Information Extraction [50.62245481416744]
We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world.
We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique.
By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z) - MuRAG: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generator for Open Question
Answering over Images and Text [58.655375327681774]
We propose the first Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Transformer (MuRAG)
MuRAG accesses an external non-parametric multimodal memory to augment language generation.
Our results show that MuRAG achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming existing models by 10-20% absolute on both datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T13:58:03Z) - Logically at the Factify 2022: Multimodal Fact Verification [2.8914815569249823]
This paper describes our participant system for the multi-modal fact verification (Factify) challenge at AAAI 2022.
Two baseline approaches are proposed and explored including an ensemble model and a multi-modal attention network.
Our best model is ranked first in leaderboard which obtains a weighted average F-measure of 0.77 on both validation and test set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T23:34:07Z) - The Multimodal Sentiment Analysis in Car Reviews (MuSe-CaR) Dataset:
Collection, Insights and Improvements [14.707930573950787]
We present MuSe-CaR, a first of its kind multimodal dataset.
The data is publicly available as it recently served as the testing bed for the 1st Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:40:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.