Cloud-based XAI Services for Assessing Open Repository Models Under Adversarial Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12261v4
• Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 03:41:26 GMT
• Title: Cloud-based XAI Services for Assessing Open Repository Models Under Adversarial Attacks
• Authors: Zerui Wang, Yan Liu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a cloud-based service framework that encapsulates computing components and assessment tasks into pipelines. We demonstrate the application of XAI services for assessing five quality attributes of AI models.
• Score: 7.500941533148728
• License:
• Abstract: The opacity of AI models necessitates both validation and evaluation before their integration into services. To investigate these models, explainable AI (XAI) employs methods that elucidate the relationship between input features and output predictions. The operations of XAI extend beyond the execution of a single algorithm, involving a series of activities that include preprocessing data, adjusting XAI to align with model parameters, invoking the model to generate predictions, and summarizing the XAI results. Adversarial attacks are well-known threats that aim to mislead AI models. The assessment complexity, especially for XAI, increases when open-source AI models are subject to adversarial attacks, due to various combinations. To automate the numerous entities and tasks involved in XAI-based assessments, we propose a cloud-based service framework that encapsulates computing components as microservices and organizes assessment tasks into pipelines. The current XAI tools are not inherently service-oriented. This framework also integrates open XAI tool libraries as part of the pipeline composition. We demonstrate the application of XAI services for assessing five quality attributes of AI models: (1) computational cost, (2) performance, (3) robustness, (4) explanation deviation, and (5) explanation resilience across computer vision and tabular cases. The service framework generates aggregated analysis that showcases the quality attributes for more than a hundred combination scenarios.

Related papers

• An Open API Architecture to Discover the Trustworthy Explanation of Cloud AI Services [11.170826645382661]
  This article presents the design of an open-API-based explainable AI (XAI) service to provide feature contribution explanations for cloud AI services. We argue that XAI operations are accessible as open APIs to enable the consolidation of the XAI operations into the cloud AI services assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:52:22Z)
• Two-Timescale Model Caching and Resource Allocation for Edge-Enabled AI-Generated Content Services [55.0337199834612]
  Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative technology, enabling customized and personalized AI-generated content (AIGC) services. These services require executing GenAI models with billions of parameters, posing significant obstacles to resource-limited wireless edge. We introduce the formulation of joint model caching and resource allocation for AIGC services to balance a trade-off between AIGC quality and latency metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T07:01:13Z)
• XEdgeAI: A Human-centered Industrial Inspection Framework with Data-centric Explainable Edge AI Approach [2.0209172586699173]
  This paper introduces a novel XAI-integrated Visual Quality Inspection framework. Our framework incorporates XAI and the Large Vision Language Model to deliver human-centered interpretability. This approach paves the way for the broader adoption of reliable and interpretable AI tools in critical industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:30:24Z)
• Explainable AI for Enhancing Efficiency of DL-based Channel Estimation [1.0136215038345013]
  Support of artificial intelligence based decision-making is a key element in future 6G networks. In such applications, using AI as black-box models is risky and challenging. We propose a novel-based XAI-CHEST framework that is oriented toward channel estimation in wireless communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T16:24:21Z)
• XAIport: A Service Framework for the Early Adoption of XAI in AI Model Development [7.196813936746303]
  We propose the early adoption of Explainable AI (XAI) with a focus on three properties: Quality of explanation, the explanation summaries should be consistent across multiple XAI methods. We present XAIport, a framework of XAI encapsulated into Open APIs to deliver early explanations as observation for learning model quality assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T15:22:06Z)
• Towards a general framework for improving the performance of classifiers using XAI methods [0.0]
  This paper proposes a framework for automatically improving the performance of pre-trained Deep Learning (DL) classifiers using XAI methods. We will call auto-encoder-based and encoder-decoder-based, and discuss their key aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T15:04:20Z)
• Enabling AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Services in Wireless Edge Networks [68.00382171900975]
  In wireless edge networks, the transmission of incorrectly generated content may unnecessarily consume network resources. We present the AIGC-as-a-service concept and discuss the challenges in deploying A at the edge networks. We propose a deep reinforcement learning-enabled algorithm for optimal ASP selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T09:30:23Z)
• Optimizing Explanations by Network Canonization and Hyperparameter Search [74.76732413972005]
  Rule-based and modified backpropagation XAI approaches often face challenges when being applied to modern model architectures. Model canonization is the process of re-structuring the model to disregard problematic components without changing the underlying function. In this work, we propose canonizations for currently relevant model blocks applicable to popular deep neural network architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T17:17:55Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)
• CARLA-GeAR: a Dataset Generator for a Systematic Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness of Vision Models [61.68061613161187]
  This paper presents CARLA-GeAR, a tool for the automatic generation of synthetic datasets for evaluating the robustness of neural models against physical adversarial patches. The tool is built on the CARLA simulator, using its Python API, and allows the generation of datasets for several vision tasks in the context of autonomous driving. The paper presents an experimental study to evaluate the performance of some defense methods against such attacks, showing how the datasets generated with CARLA-GeAR might be used in future work as a benchmark for adversarial defense in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T09:17:38Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.