Embedding Elites: Examining the Use of Tweets Embedded in Online News
Articles across Reliable and Fringe Outlets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16572v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:18:22 GMT
- Title: Embedding Elites: Examining the Use of Tweets Embedded in Online News
Articles across Reliable and Fringe Outlets
- Authors: Benjamin D. Horne, Summer Phillips, Nelia Koontz
- Abstract summary: We use a mixed-method analysis to examine how the function and frequency of embedded tweets change across outlet reliability and news topic.
We find that embedded tweets are most often used to relay the opinions of elites, to syndicate information from another news source, or to self-cite information an outlet previously produced.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This study examines the use of embedded tweets in online news media. In
particular, we add to the previous literature by exploring embedded tweets
across reliable and unreliable news outlets. We use a mixed-method analysis to
examine how the function and frequency of embedded tweets change across outlet
reliability and news topic. We find that, no matter the outlet reliability,
embedded tweets are most often used to relay the opinions of elites, to
syndicate information from another news source, or to self-cite information an
outlet previously produced. Our results also show some notable differences
between reliable media and fringe media's use of tweets. Namely, fringe media
embed tweets more and use those tweets as the source of news more than reliable
media. Our work adds to the literature on hybrid media systems and the
normalization of social media in journalism.
Related papers
- Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Which tweets 'deserve' to be included in news stories? Chronemics of
tweet embedding [0.0]
The study focuses on the pressures of immediacy on the media ecosystems.
By analyzing a large corpora of news outlets that have embedded tweets, this study analyzes tweet embedding practices.
We ask two main questions: which types of outlets are quicker to embed tweets, and which types of users' tweets are more likely to be embedded quickly?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T20:08:35Z) - GREENER: Graph Neural Networks for News Media Profiling [24.675574340841163]
We study the problem of profiling news media on the Web with respect to their factuality of reporting and bias.
Our main focus is on modeling the similarity between media outlets based on the overlap of their audience.
Prediction accuracy is found to improve by 2.5-27 macro-F1 points for the two tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-10T12:46:29Z) - Engaging Politically Diverse Audiences on Social Media [11.786863362728868]
We study how political polarization is reflected in the social media posts used by media outlets to promote their content online.
We build a tool that integrates our model and helps journalists craft tweets that are engaging to a politically diverse audience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-04T05:58:49Z) - BERT based classification system for detecting rumours on Twitter [3.2872586139884623]
We propose a novel approach to identify rumours on Twitter, rather than the usual feature extraction techniques.
We use sentence embedding using BERT to represent each tweet's sentences into a vector according to the contextual meaning of the tweet.
Our BERT based models improved the accuracy by approximately 10% as compared to previous methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-07T10:15:54Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Stance Detection with BERT Embeddings for Credibility Analysis of
Information on Social Media [1.7616042687330642]
We propose a model for detecting fake news using stance as one of the features along with the content of the article.
Our work interprets the content with automatic feature extraction and the relevance of the text pieces.
The experiment conducted on the real-world dataset indicates that our model outperforms the previous work and enables fake news detection with an accuracy of 95.32%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-21T10:46:43Z) - Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation.
We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines.
Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z) - HoaxItaly: a collection of Italian disinformation and fact-checking
stories shared on Twitter in 2019 [72.96986027203377]
The dataset includes also title and body for approximately 37k news articles.
It is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.79DVN/ PGVDHX.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-29T16:14:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.