Detecting LLM-Assisted Writing in Scientific Communication: Are We There Yet?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16807v2
• Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:19:36 GMT
• Title: Detecting LLM-Assisted Writing in Scientific Communication: Are We There Yet?
• Authors: Teddy Lazebnik, Ariel Rosenfeld,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly reshaped text generation, particularly in the realm of writing assistance. A potential avenue to encourage accurate acknowledging of LLM-assisted writing involves employing automated detectors. Our evaluation of four cutting-edge LLM-generated text detectors reveals their suboptimal performance compared to a simple ad-hoc detector.
• Score: 2.894383634912343
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by ChatGPT, have significantly reshaped text generation, particularly in the realm of writing assistance. While ethical considerations underscore the importance of transparently acknowledging LLM use, especially in scientific communication, genuine acknowledgment remains infrequent. A potential avenue to encourage accurate acknowledging of LLM-assisted writing involves employing automated detectors. Our evaluation of four cutting-edge LLM-generated text detectors reveals their suboptimal performance compared to a simple ad-hoc detector designed to identify abrupt writing style changes around the time of LLM proliferation. We contend that the development of specialized detectors exclusively dedicated to LLM-assisted writing detection is necessary. Such detectors could play a crucial role in fostering more authentic recognition of LLM involvement in scientific communication, addressing the current challenges in acknowledgment practices.

Related papers

• Understanding the Effects of Human-written Paraphrases in LLM-generated Text Detection [7.242609314791262]
  Human & LLM Paraphrase Collection (HLPC) is a first-of-its-kind dataset that incorporates human-written texts and paraphrases. We perform classification experiments that incorporate human-written paraphrases, watermarked and non-watermarked LLM-generated documents from GPT and OPT, and LLM-generated paraphrases from DIPPER and BART. Results show that the inclusion of human-written paraphrases has a significant impact of LLM-generated detector performance, promoting TPR@1%FPR with a possible trade-off of AUROC and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:06:21Z)
• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse. Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-AI collaboration. To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• Revise, Reason, and Recognize: LLM-Based Emotion Recognition via Emotion-Specific Prompts and ASR Error Correction [31.677026213735363]
  We propose novel prompts that incorporate emotion-specific knowledge from acoustics, linguistics, and psychology. Experiments on context-aware learning, in-context learning, and instruction tuning are performed to examine the usefulness of LLM training schemes. Our study aims to refine the use of LLMs in emotion recognition and related domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T21:07:06Z)
• ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations [55.06804460642062]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate human-preferable texts. In this paper, we identify the common characteristics shared by these models. We propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:38:33Z)
• Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) Improves Confidence Calibration of Large Language Models [84.94220787791389]
  We propose Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) prompting, which improves the LLM calibration in two steps. Experiments show that FaR achieves significantly better calibration; it lowers the Expected Error by 23.5%. FaR even elicits the capability of verbally expressing concerns in less confident scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T01:37:23Z)
• LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning [4.328134379418151]
  Existing AI-generated text detection models are prone to in-domain over-fitting. We propose LLM-Detector, a novel method for both document-level and sentence-level text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T05:54:12Z)
• A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content [97.87912800179531]
  The ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance. We aim to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks. We also posit the necessity for a multi-faceted approach to defend against various attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T09:10:26Z)
• A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions [39.36381851190369]
  There is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text. This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content. The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T09:01:13Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.