Multipath parsing in the brain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.18046v2
• Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 13:40:47 GMT
• Title: Multipath parsing in the brain
• Authors: Berta Franzluebbers, Donald Dunagan, Miloš Stanojević, Jan Buys, John T. Hale,
• Abstract summary: Humans understand sentences word-by-word, in the order that they hear them. We investigate how humans process these syntactic ambiguities by correlating predictions from incremental dependencys with timecourse data from people undergoing functional neuroimaging while listening to an audiobook. In both English and Chinese, we find evidence for multipath parsing. Brain regions associated with this multipath effect include bilateral superior temporal gyrus.
• Score: 4.605070569473395
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Humans understand sentences word-by-word, in the order that they hear them. This incrementality entails resolving temporary ambiguities about syntactic relationships. We investigate how humans process these syntactic ambiguities by correlating predictions from incremental generative dependency parsers with timecourse data from people undergoing functional neuroimaging while listening to an audiobook. In particular, we compare competing hypotheses regarding the number of developing syntactic analyses in play during word-by-word comprehension: one vs more than one. This comparison involves evaluating syntactic surprisal from a state-of-the-art dependency parser with LLM-adapted encodings against an existing fMRI dataset. In both English and Chinese data, we find evidence for multipath parsing. Brain regions associated with this multipath effect include bilateral superior temporal gyrus.

Related papers

• Syntactic Language Change in English and German: Metrics, Parsers, and Convergences [56.47832275431858]
  The current paper looks at diachronic trends in syntactic language change in both English and German, using corpora of parliamentary debates from the last c. 160 years. We base our observations on five dependencys, including the widely used Stanford Core as well as 4 newer alternatives. We show that changes in syntactic measures seem to be more frequent at the tails of sentence length distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T11:46:16Z)
• ParaAMR: A Large-Scale Syntactically Diverse Paraphrase Dataset by AMR Back-Translation [59.91139600152296]
  ParaAMR is a large-scale syntactically diverse paraphrase dataset created by abstract meaning representation back-translation. We show that ParaAMR can be used to improve on three NLP tasks: learning sentence embeddings, syntactically controlled paraphrase generation, and data augmentation for few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T02:27:33Z)
• Structural Ambiguity and its Disambiguation in Language Model Based Parsers: the Case of Dutch Clause Relativization [2.9950872478176627]
  We study how the presence of a prior sentence can resolve relative clause ambiguities. Results show that a neurosymbolic, based on proof nets, is more open to data bias correction than an approach based on universal dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T09:04:18Z)
• Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Context [87.31930367845125]
  We trained a lexical language model, Glove, and a supra-lexical language model, GPT-2, on a text corpus. We then assessed to what extent these information-restricted models were able to predict the time-courses of fMRI signal of humans listening to naturalistic text. Our analyses show that, while most brain regions involved in language are sensitive to both syntactic and semantic variables, the relative magnitudes of these effects vary a lot across these regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T08:16:18Z)
• Syntactic Structure Processing in the Brain while Listening [3.735055636181383]
  There are two popular syntactic parsing methods: constituency and dependency parsing. Recent works have used syntactic embeddings based on constituency trees, incremental top-down parsing, and other word syntactic features for brain activity prediction given the text stimuli to study how the syntax structure is represented in the brain's language network. We investigate the predictive power of the brain encoding models in three settings: (i) individual performance of the constituency and dependency syntactic parsing based embedding methods, (ii) efficacy of these syntactic parsing based embedding methods when controlling for basic syntactic signals, and (iii) relative effectiveness of each of the syntactic embedding methods when controlling for
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T21:28:11Z)
• Contextualized Semantic Distance between Highly Overlapped Texts [85.1541170468617]
  Overlapping frequently occurs in paired texts in natural language processing tasks like text editing and semantic similarity evaluation. This paper aims to address the issue with a mask-and-predict strategy. We take the words in the longest common sequence as neighboring words and use masked language modeling (MLM) to predict the distributions on their positions. Experiments on Semantic Textual Similarity show NDD to be more sensitive to various semantic differences, especially on highly overlapped paired texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:59:15Z)
• Decomposing lexical and compositional syntax and semantics with deep language models [82.81964713263483]
  The activations of language transformers like GPT2 have been shown to linearly map onto brain activity during speech comprehension. Here, we propose a taxonomy to factorize the high-dimensional activations of language models into four classes: lexical, compositional, syntactic, and semantic representations. The results highlight two findings. First, compositional representations recruit a more widespread cortical network than lexical ones, and encompass the bilateral temporal, parietal and prefrontal cortices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T10:24:05Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)
• A Survey of Syntactic-Semantic Parsing Based on Constituent and Dependency Structures [14.714725860010724]
  We focus on two of the most popular formalizations of parsing: constituent parsing and dependency parsing. This article briefly reviews the representative models of constituent parsing and dependency parsing, and also dependency parsing with rich semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T10:21:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.