Preference Poisoning Attacks on Reward Model Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01920v2
• Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 20:32:15 GMT
• Title: Preference Poisoning Attacks on Reward Model Learning
• Authors: Junlin Wu, Jiongxiao Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Chenguang Wang, Ning Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the nature and extent of a vulnerability in learning reward models from pairwise comparisons. We propose two classes of algorithmic approaches for these attacks: a gradient-based framework, and several variants of rank-by-distance methods. We find that the best attacks are often highly successful, achieving in the most extreme case 100% success rate with only 0.3% of the data poisoned.
• Score: 47.00395978031771
• License:
• Abstract: Learning reward models from pairwise comparisons is a fundamental component in a number of domains, including autonomous control, conversational agents, and recommendation systems, as part of a broad goal of aligning automated decisions with user preferences. These approaches entail collecting preference information from people, with feedback often provided anonymously. Since preferences are subjective, there is no gold standard to compare against; yet, reliance of high-impact systems on preference learning creates a strong motivation for malicious actors to skew data collected in this fashion to their ends. We investigate the nature and extent of this vulnerability by considering an attacker who can flip a small subset of preference comparisons to either promote or demote a target outcome. We propose two classes of algorithmic approaches for these attacks: a gradient-based framework, and several variants of rank-by-distance methods. Next, we evaluate the efficacy of best attacks in both these classes in successfully achieving malicious goals on datasets from three domains: autonomous control, recommendation system, and textual prompt-response preference learning. We find that the best attacks are often highly successful, achieving in the most extreme case 100\% success rate with only 0.3\% of the data poisoned. However, \emph{which} attack is best can vary significantly across domains. In addition, we observe that the simpler and more scalable rank-by-distance approaches are often competitive with, and on occasion significantly outperform, gradient-based methods. Finally, we show that state-of-the-art defenses against other classes of poisoning attacks exhibit limited efficacy in our setting.

Related papers

• AttackBench: Evaluating Gradient-based Attacks for Adversarial Examples [26.37278338032268]
  Adrial examples are typically optimized with gradient-based attacks. Each is shown to outperform its predecessors using different experimental setups. This provides overly-optimistic and even biased evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T11:19:05Z)
• Alternating Objectives Generates Stronger PGD-Based Adversarial Attacks [78.2700757742992]
  Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) is one of the most effective and conceptually simple algorithms to generate such adversaries. We experimentally verify this assertion on a synthetic-data example and by evaluating our proposed method across 25 different $ell_infty$-robust models and 3 datasets. Our strongest adversarial attack outperforms all of the white-box components of AutoAttack ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T17:44:31Z)
• Universal Distributional Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attack with Reinforcement Learning [5.240772699480865]
  We propose a pixel-wise decision-based attack algorithm that finds a distribution of adversarial perturbation through a reinforcement learning algorithm. Experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art decision-based attacks with a higher attack success rate and greater transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T18:30:18Z)
• A Tale of HodgeRank and Spectral Method: Target Attack Against Rank Aggregation Is the Fixed Point of Adversarial Game [153.74942025516853]
  The intrinsic vulnerability of the rank aggregation methods is not well studied in the literature. In this paper, we focus on the purposeful adversary who desires to designate the aggregated results by modifying the pairwise data. The effectiveness of the suggested target attack strategies is demonstrated by a series of toy simulations and several real-world data experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-13T05:59:02Z)
• Resisting Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks using Diverse Decision Boundaries [12.312877365123267]
  Deep learning systems are vulnerable to crafted adversarial examples, which may be imperceptible to the human eye, but can lead the model to misclassify. We develop a new ensemble-based solution that constructs defender models with diverse decision boundaries with respect to the original model. We present extensive experimentations using standard image classification datasets, namely MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 against state-of-the-art adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T08:19:26Z)
• Adversarial Robustness of Deep Reinforcement Learning based Dynamic Recommender Systems [50.758281304737444]
  We propose to explore adversarial examples and attack detection on reinforcement learning-based interactive recommendation systems. We first craft different types of adversarial examples by adding perturbations to the input and intervening on the casual factors. Then, we augment recommendation systems by detecting potential attacks with a deep learning-based classifier based on the crafted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T04:12:24Z)
• Towards A Conceptually Simple Defensive Approach for Few-shot classifiers Against Adversarial Support Samples [107.38834819682315]
  We study a conceptually simple approach to defend few-shot classifiers against adversarial attacks. We propose a simple attack-agnostic detection method, using the concept of self-similarity and filtering. Our evaluation on the miniImagenet (MI) and CUB datasets exhibit good attack detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T05:46:03Z)
• Adversarial Attack and Defense in Deep Ranking [100.17641539999055]
  We propose two attacks against deep ranking systems that can raise or lower the rank of chosen candidates by adversarial perturbations. Conversely, an anti-collapse triplet defense is proposed to improve the ranking model robustness against all proposed attacks. Our adversarial ranking attacks and defenses are evaluated on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CUB200-2011, CARS196 and Stanford Online Products datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T13:41:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.