Understanding What Affects the Generalization Gap in Visual Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Empirical Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02701v2
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:12:42 GMT
• Title: Understanding What Affects the Generalization Gap in Visual Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Empirical Evidence
• Authors: Jiafei Lyu, Le Wan, Xiu Li, Zongqing Lu,
• Abstract summary: This paper theoretically answers the key factors that contribute to the generalization gap when the testing environment has distractors. Our theories indicate that minimizing the representation distance between training and testing environments, which aligns with human intuition, is the most critical for the benefit of reducing the generalization gap.
• Score: 53.51724434972605
• License:
• Abstract: Recently, there are many efforts attempting to learn useful policies for continuous control in visual reinforcement learning (RL). In this scenario, it is important to learn a generalizable policy, as the testing environment may differ from the training environment, e.g., there exist distractors during deployment. Many practical algorithms are proposed to handle this problem. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of them provide a theoretical understanding of what affects the generalization gap and why their proposed methods work. In this paper, we bridge this issue by theoretically answering the key factors that contribute to the generalization gap when the testing environment has distractors. Our theories indicate that minimizing the representation distance between training and testing environments, which aligns with human intuition, is the most critical for the benefit of reducing the generalization gap. Our theoretical results are supported by the empirical evidence in the DMControl Generalization Benchmark (DMC-GB).

Related papers

• InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practice [15.744372232355]
  We introduce AnInfoNCE, a generalization of InfoNCE that can provably uncover the latent factors in anisotropic setting. We show that AnInfoNCE increases the recovery of previously collapsed information in CIFAR10 and ImageNet, albeit at the cost of downstream accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T16:08:26Z)
• Zero-Shot Generalization during Instruction Tuning: Insights from Similarity and Granularity [84.12126298229866]
  We show that zero-shot generalization during instruction tuning happens very early. We also show that encountering highly similar and fine-grained training data earlier during instruction tuning, without the constraints of defined "tasks", enables better generalization. For the first time, we show that zero-shot generalization during instruction tuning is a form of similarity-based generalization between training and test data at the instance level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:40:21Z)
• On the Importance of Exploration for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning [89.63074327328765]
  We propose EDE: Exploration via Distributional Ensemble, a method that encourages exploration of states with high uncertainty. Our algorithm is the first value-based approach to achieve state-of-the-art on both Procgen and Crafter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:07:02Z)
• Theoretical Guarantees of Learning Ensembling Strategies with Applications to Time Series Forecasting [14.037314994161378]
  We show that choosing the best stacked generalization from a (finite or finite-dimensional) family of stacked generalizations based on cross-validated performance does not perform "much worse" than the oracle best. Inspired by the theoretical analysis, we propose a particular family of stacked generalizations in the context of probabilistic forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T07:01:02Z)
• Adversarial Robustness with Semi-Infinite Constrained Learning [177.42714838799924]
  Deep learning to inputs perturbations has raised serious questions about its use in safety-critical domains. We propose a hybrid Langevin Monte Carlo training approach to mitigate this issue. We show that our approach can mitigate the trade-off between state-of-the-art performance and robust robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T13:30:42Z)
• Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs [25.445394992810925]
  We propose a theoretical framework that characterizes the generalizability of goal-conditioned policies to new environments. Under this framework, we develop a practical method PA-SkewFit that enhances domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T08:10:45Z)
• CARL: A Benchmark for Contextual and Adaptive Reinforcement Learning [45.52724876199729]
  We present CARL, a collection of well-known RL environments extended to contextual RL problems. We provide first evidence that disentangling representation learning of the states from the policy learning with the context facilitates better generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T15:04:01Z)
• Which Mutual-Information Representation Learning Objectives are Sufficient for Control? [80.2534918595143]
  Mutual information provides an appealing formalism for learning representations of data. This paper formalizes the sufficiency of a state representation for learning and representing the optimal policy. Surprisingly, we find that two of these objectives can yield insufficient representations given mild and common assumptions on the structure of the MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T10:12:34Z)
• In Search of Robust Measures of Generalization [79.75709926309703]
  We develop bounds on generalization error, optimization error, and excess risk. When evaluated empirically, most of these bounds are numerically vacuous. We argue that generalization measures should instead be evaluated within the framework of distributional robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T17:54:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.