[Citation needed] Data usage and citation practices in medical imaging conferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03003v2
• Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:40:40 GMT
• Title: [Citation needed] Data usage and citation practices in medical imaging conferences
• Authors: Théo Sourget, Ahmet Akkoç, Stinna Winther, Christine Lyngbye Galsgaard, Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez, Dovile Juodelyte, Caroline Petitjean, Veronika Cheplygina,
• Abstract summary: We present two open-source tools that could help with the detection of dataset usage. We studied the usage of 20 publicly available medical datasets in papers from MICCAI and MIDL. Our findings demonstrate the concentration of the usage of a limited set of datasets.
• Score: 1.9702506447163306
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Medical imaging papers often focus on methodology, but the quality of the algorithms and the validity of the conclusions are highly dependent on the datasets used. As creating datasets requires a lot of effort, researchers often use publicly available datasets, there is however no adopted standard for citing the datasets used in scientific papers, leading to difficulty in tracking dataset usage. In this work, we present two open-source tools we created that could help with the detection of dataset usage, a pipeline \url{https://github.com/TheoSourget/Public_Medical_Datasets_References} using OpenAlex and full-text analysis, and a PDF annotation software \url{https://github.com/TheoSourget/pdf_annotator} used in our study to manually label the presence of datasets. We applied both tools on a study of the usage of 20 publicly available medical datasets in papers from MICCAI and MIDL. We compute the proportion and the evolution between 2013 and 2023 of 3 types of presence in a paper: cited, mentioned in the full text, cited and mentioned. Our findings demonstrate the concentration of the usage of a limited set of datasets. We also highlight different citing practices, making the automation of tracking difficult.

Related papers

• SciER: An Entity and Relation Extraction Dataset for Datasets, Methods, and Tasks in Scientific Documents [49.54155332262579]
  We release a new entity and relation extraction dataset for entities related to datasets, methods, and tasks in scientific articles. Our dataset contains 106 manually annotated full-text scientific publications with over 24k entities and 12k relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:56:49Z)
• Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [3.623224034411137]
  offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an exciting direction of research that uses static datasets to find optimal control policies for multi-agent systems. Though the field is by definition data-driven, efforts have thus far neglected data in their drive to achieve state-of-the-art results. We show how the majority of works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology and provide sparse information about the characteristics of these datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T14:13:24Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Enrich the Documentation of Datasets for Machine Learning [1.8270184406083445]
  We explore using large language models (LLM) and prompting strategies to automatically extract dimensions from documents. Our approach could aid data publishers and practitioners in creating machine-readable documentation. We have released an open-source tool implementing our approach and a replication package, including the experiments' code and results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:09:28Z)
• A large dataset curation and benchmark for drug target interaction [0.7699646945563469]
  Bioactivity data plays a key role in drug discovery and repurposing. We propose a way to standardize and represent efficiently a very large dataset curated from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:06:25Z)
• Interactive Distillation of Large Single-Topic Corpora of Scientific Papers [1.2954493726326113]
  A more robust but time-consuming approach is to build the dataset constructively in which a subject matter expert handpicks documents. Here we showcase a new tool, based on machine learning, for constructively generating targeted datasets of scientific literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T17:18:36Z)
• Replication: Contrastive Learning and Data Augmentation in Traffic Classification Using a Flowpic Input Representation [47.95762911696397]
  We reproduce [16] on the same datasets and replicate its most salient aspect (the importance of data augmentation) on three additional public datasets. While we confirm most of the original results, we also found a 20% accuracy drop on some of the investigated scenarios due to a data shift in the original dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T12:55:09Z)
• infoVerse: A Universal Framework for Dataset Characterization with Multidimensional Meta-information [68.76707843019886]
  infoVerse is a universal framework for dataset characterization. infoVerse captures multidimensional characteristics of datasets by incorporating various model-driven meta-information. In three real-world applications (data pruning, active learning, and data annotation), the samples chosen on infoVerse space consistently outperform strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T18:12:48Z)
• Going beyond research datasets: Novel intent discovery in the industry setting [60.90117614762879]
  This paper proposes methods to improve the intent discovery pipeline deployed in a large e-commerce platform. We show the benefit of pre-training language models on in-domain data: both self-supervised and with weak supervision. We also devise the best method to utilize the conversational structure (i.e., question and answer) of real-life datasets during fine-tuning for clustering tasks, which we call Conv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T14:21:29Z)
• Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation with Distant Supervision [69.15410325679635]
  We propose a new generation task called Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation (PADTG) It is more practical since it utilizes automatically annotated data for training and thus considerably expands the application domains. Our framework outperforms all baseline models as well as verify the feasibility of utilizing partially-aligned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T03:18:52Z)
• Machine Identification of High Impact Research through Text and Image Analysis [0.4737991126491218]
  We present a system to automatically separate papers with a high from those with a low likelihood of gaining citations. Our system uses both a visual classifier, useful for surmising a document's overall appearance, and a text classifier, for making content-informed decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T19:12:24Z)
• Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphs [86.96887552203479]
  We present the Open Graph Benchmark (OGB) to facilitate scalable, robust, and reproducible graph machine learning (ML) research. OGB datasets are large-scale, encompass multiple important graph ML tasks, and cover a diverse range of domains. For each dataset, we provide a unified evaluation protocol using meaningful application-specific data splits and evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T03:09:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.