Unlocking Criminal Hierarchies: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Exploration of Techniques for Identifying Leaders within Criminal Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03355v2
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 21:46:48 GMT
- Title: Unlocking Criminal Hierarchies: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Exploration of Techniques for Identifying Leaders within Criminal Networks
- Authors: Kamal Taha, Abdulhadi Shoufan, Aya Taha,
- Abstract summary: This paper offers a thorough analysis of techniques and algorithms used in the identification of crime leaders within criminal networks.
For each technique, the paper examines its effectiveness, limitations, potential for improvement, and future prospects.
- Score: 0.8192907805418581
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This survey paper offers a thorough analysis of techniques and algorithms used in the identification of crime leaders within criminal networks. For each technique, the paper examines its effectiveness, limitations, potential for improvement, and future prospects. The main challenge faced by existing survey papers focusing on algorithms for identifying crime leaders and predicting crimes is effectively categorizing these algorithms. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a new methodological taxonomy that hierarchically classifies algorithms into more detailed categories and specific techniques. The paper includes empirical and experimental evaluations to rank the different techniques. The combination of the methodological taxonomy, empirical evaluations, and experimental comparisons allows for a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the techniques and algorithms for identifying crime leaders, assisting researchers in making informed decisions. Moreover, the paper offers valuable insights into the future prospects of techniques for identifying crime leaders, emphasizing potential advancements and opportunities for further research. Here's an overview of our empirical analysis findings and experimental insights, along with the solution we've devised: (1) PageRank and Eigenvector centrality are reliable for mapping network connections, (2) Katz Centrality can effectively identify influential criminals through indirect links, stressing their significance in criminal networks, (3) current models fail to account for the specific impacts of criminal influence levels, the importance of socio-economic context, and the dynamic nature of criminal networks and hierarchies, and (4) we propose enhancements, such as incorporating temporal dynamics and sentiment analysis to reflect the fluidity of criminal activities and relationships
Related papers
- Advancing Crime Linkage Analysis with Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review and Framework for Data-Driven Approaches [0.0]
Crime linkage is the process of analyzing criminal behavior data to determine whether a pair or group of crime cases are connected or belong to a series of offenses.
This study aims to understand the challenges faced by machine learning approaches in crime linkage and to support foundational knowledge for future data-driven methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T18:22:45Z) - Empirical and Experimental Insights into Data Mining Techniques for
Crime Prediction: A Comprehensive Survey [0.8702432681310399]
The paper covers the statistical methods, machine learning algorithms, and deep learning techniques employed to analyze crime data.
We propose a methodological taxonomy that classifies crime prediction algorithms into specific techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T15:00:45Z) - Empirical and Experimental Perspectives on Big Data in Recommendation
Systems: A Comprehensive Survey [2.6319554262325924]
This survey paper provides a comprehensive analysis of big data algorithms in recommendation systems.
It proposes a two-pronged approach: a thorough analysis of current algorithms and a novel, hierarchical taxonomy for precise categorization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T23:51:29Z) - Crime Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Systematic
Review and Future Directions [2.624902795082451]
This review paper examines over 150 articles to explore the various machine learning and deep learning algorithms applied to predict crime.
The study provides access to the datasets used for crime prediction by researchers.
The paper highlights potential gaps and future directions that can enhance the accuracy of crime prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T21:07:42Z) - Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models.
First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough.
Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z) - Fairness Deconstructed: A Sociotechnical View of 'Fair' Algorithms in
Criminal Justice [0.0]
Machine learning researchers have developed methods for fairness, many of which rely on equalizing empirical metrics across protected attributes.
I argue that much of the fair ML fails to account for fairness issues with underlying crime data.
Instead of building AI that reifies power imbalances, I ask whether data science can be used to understand the root causes of structural marginalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T06:52:49Z) - Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation
of Fair Classification [75.49600684537117]
Data management research is showing an increasing presence and interest in topics related to data and algorithmic fairness.
We contribute a broad analysis of 13 fair classification approaches and additional variants, over their correctness, fairness, efficiency, scalability, and stability.
Our analysis highlights novel insights on the impact of different metrics and high-level approach characteristics on different aspects of performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-18T22:55:40Z) - A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning.
This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021.
We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z) - Deep Learning for Community Detection: Progress, Challenges and
Opportunities [79.26787486888549]
Article summarizes the contributions of the various frameworks, models, and algorithms in deep neural networks.
This article summarizes the contributions of the various frameworks, models, and algorithms in deep neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-17T11:22:11Z) - A Survey on Causal Inference [64.45536158710014]
Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy and economics.
Various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T21:35:29Z) - Survey of Network Intrusion Detection Methods from the Perspective of
the Knowledge Discovery in Databases Process [63.75363908696257]
We review the methods that have been applied to network data with the purpose of developing an intrusion detector.
We discuss the techniques used for the capture, preparation and transformation of the data, as well as, the data mining and evaluation methods.
As a result of this literature review, we investigate some open issues which will need to be considered for further research in the area of network security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-27T11:21:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.