Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05369v3
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 07:29:40 GMT
• Title: Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards
• Authors: Huayu Chen, Guande He, Lifan Yuan, Ganqu Cui, Hang Su, Jun Zhu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a general framework for LM alignment, leveraging NCE to bridge the gap in handling reward datasets explicitly annotated with scalar evaluations. Our framework comprises two parallel algorithms, NCA and InfoNCA, both enabling the direct extraction of an LM policy from reward data as well as preference data. By comparing NCA and InfoNCA, we demonstrate that the well-observed decreasing-likelihood trend of DPO/InfoNCA is caused by their focus on adjusting relative likelihood across different responses.
• Score: 32.90586853892559
• License:
• Abstract: User intentions are typically formalized as evaluation rewards to be maximized when fine-tuning language models (LMs). Existing alignment methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), are mainly tailored for pairwise preference data where rewards are implicitly defined rather than explicitly given. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for LM alignment, leveraging Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) to bridge the gap in handling reward datasets explicitly annotated with scalar evaluations. Our framework comprises two parallel algorithms, NCA and InfoNCA, both enabling the direct extraction of an LM policy from reward data as well as preference data. Notably, we show that the DPO loss is a special case of our proposed InfoNCA objective under pairwise preference settings, thereby integrating and extending current alignment theories. By comparing NCA and InfoNCA, we demonstrate that the well-observed decreasing-likelihood trend of DPO/InfoNCA is caused by their focus on adjusting relative likelihood across different responses. In contrast, NCA optimizes the absolute likelihood for each response, thereby effectively preventing the chosen likelihood from decreasing. We evaluate our methods in both reward and preference settings with Mistral-8*7B and 7B models. Experiments suggest that InfoNCA/NCA surpasses various preference baselines when reward datasets are available. We also find NCA significantly outperforms DPO in complex reasoning tasks like math and coding.

Related papers

• PIPA: Preference Alignment as Prior-Informed Statistical Estimation [57.24096291517857]
  We introduce Pior-Informed Preference Alignment (PIPA), a unified, RL-free probabilistic framework. PIPA accommodates both paired and unpaired data, as well as answer and step-level annotations. By integrating different types of prior information, we developed two variations of PIPA: PIPA-M and PIPA-N.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T04:31:30Z)
• Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [19.02679077706812]
  We study the problem of aligning large language models with human preference data. We propose direct preference optimization (Cal-DPO), a simple yet effective algorithm. The results of our experiments on a variety of standard benchmarks show that Cal-DPO remarkably improves off-the-shelf methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T04:31:56Z)
• Towards Improved Preference Optimization Pipeline: from Data Generation to Budget-Controlled Regularization [14.50339880957898]
  We aim to improve the preference optimization pipeline by taking a closer look at preference data generation and training regularization techniques. For preference data generation, we propose an iterative pairwise ranking mechanism that derives preference ranking of completions using pairwise comparison signals. For training regularization, we observe that preference optimization tends to achieve better convergence when the LLM predicted likelihood of preferred samples gets slightly reduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T23:03:11Z)
• TPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Multi-branch & Multi-step Preference Trees [14.84379332031731]
  We introduce Tree Preference Optimization (TPO), that does not sample paired preference responses from the preference tree. TPO formulates the language model alignment as a Preference List Ranking problem, where the policy can learn more effectively from a ranked preference list of responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T22:22:05Z)
• Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs [63.32585910975191]
  We introduce reward-conditioned Large Language Models (LLMs) that learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset. We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T16:01:51Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC. We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications. We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
  We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data. Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z)
• Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings [62.335733662381884]
  We study the conventional wisdom that preference learning trains models to assign higher likelihoods to more preferred outputs than less preferred outputs. We find that most state-of-the-art preference-tuned models achieve a ranking accuracy of less than 60% on common preference datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:29:44Z)
• Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization [105.3612692153615]
  We propose a new axis based on eliciting preferences jointly over instruction-response pairs. Joint preferences over instruction and response pairs can significantly enhance the alignment of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T02:05:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.